Connect with us

News

Not Letting a ‘Good Tragedy Go to Waste,’ Trump Joins Dems to Push for Gun Management

Published

on

Not Letting a 'Good Tragedy Go to Waste,' Trump Joins Dems to Push for Gun Control

A number of tragic mass shootings have as soon as once more gripped the nation and thrown Individuals in a tizzy of debate about gun management. These newest tragedies have managed to get bipartisan assist for brand spanking new gun management measures with president Donald Trump, distinguished Republicans and Democrats popping out swinging simply hours after the shootings.

Echoing the well-known sentiment of Rahm Emmanuel of “by no means (letting) a severe disaster to go to waste,” Trump got here out aggressively this week noting that “We will need to have one thing good, if not GREAT, come out of those two tragic occasions!”

Following his Tweets, Trump gave a speech on the White Home calling for stricter gun legal guidelines.

“We should be sure that these judged to pose a grave threat to public security do not need entry to firearms, and that in the event that they do, these firearms could be taken by way of fast due course of,” Trump mentioned on the White Home throughout a press release responding to the weekend massacres that killed at the least 31 individuals in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio. “That’s the reason I’ve known as for red-flag legal guidelines, also called extreme-risk safety orders.”

Trump’s remarks are on board with new gun laws proposed by democrats which has bipartisan assist from ostensible supporters of 2nd Modification rights on the best. This isn’t, nevertheless, pro-gun rights.

Republicans pushing for controversial purple flag legal guidelines ought to come as no shock, nevertheless, because it has lengthy been on their agenda. As TFTP beforehand reported in February of 2018, after the tragic capturing in Parkland, FL, President Donald Trump took to nationwide tv to betray his oath to the Structure and his supporters and famously mentioned, “take the weapons first, undergo due course of second.” Whereas this was largely ignored by his base and downplayed within the media since then, that’s precisely what’s been taking place. Trump has merely rebranded it as “fast due course of.”

However would grabbing weapons from individuals deemed a threat by the state even have any impact on mass violence? Not going.

Stronger background checks would have little to no impact on mass shootings as a lot of the mass shooters purchase their weapons legally and go the background checks. As Motive factors out:

The weather of that laws are largely window dressing that may do little or nothing to stop assaults like these. Essentially the most ceaselessly talked about coverage, “common background checks,” is plainly irrelevant to those explicit crimes, since each the El Paso shooter and the Dayton shooter bought their weapons legally, which means they didn’t have disqualifying legal or psychiatric data. Nor do the overwhelming majority of mass shooters, who both handed background checks or might have. Neither requiring background checks for personal transfers nor creating “robust background checks,” as President Donald Trump has proposed (maybe referring to the identical coverage), would make a distinction in such circumstances.

However what about purple flag legal guidelines that take weapons from individuals deemed a threat?

Residents who’re focused by these legal guidelines shall be deemed responsible first and solely after their weapons are taken, will they’ve an opportunity to defend themselves in courtroom. That is the de facto removing of due course of.

As Reuters reviews, below the laws, a member of the family or legislation enforcement officer might petition a choose to grab firearms from an individual they assume is a menace to themselves or others. The choose might then maintain a listening to with out the focused particular person being current and grant a brief order for 14 days.

Underneath the fifth and fourteenth amendments, due course of clauses are in place to behave as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the federal government exterior the sanction of legislation.

Despite what officers and the media declare, when an individual is stripped of their constitutional rights, albeit quickly, with out being given the prospect to make their very own case based mostly on what could be completely arbitrary accusations, that is the removing of due course of. And, it doesn’t work.

We’ve seen this play out earlier than already. Earlier this yr, a tragedy unfolded in California as a deranged gunman, Kevin Douglas Limbaugh, walked up on an harmless lady, officer Natalie Corona, pulled out his weapons and started capturing her repeatedly till she died. Limbaugh then fired a number of extra pictures at others earlier than turning the gun on himself and taking his personal life. Had extra individuals been close by, Limbaugh would’ve doubtless carried out a mass capturing.

Limbaugh’s case is vital to convey up as a consequence of the truth that — earlier than he killed a cop — he was topic to California’s “purple flag” legal guidelines in 2018. Limbaugh was given a high-risk evaluation that ordered him to show in his registered weapons to police, the one one being a Bushmaster AR-15. On November 9, Limbaugh turned within the weapon.

Regardless of being banned from possessing a weapon, he nonetheless obtained one illegally and used it to commit homicide.

What’s extra, there have been already legal guidelines on the books that ought to’ve stopped Nikolas Cruz, the murdering psychopath in Parkland Fl, from ever getting a gun as nicely. However none of them labored.

Citing Cruz as the rationale for advocating the erosion of the 2nd Modification, the anti-gun activists are claiming he ought to’ve had his weapons taken which might have prevented the tragedy. Sadly, nevertheless, they’re ignoring the truth that he was accused of a number of felonies by a number of individuals—and will’ve by no means been in a position to buy a gun within the first place—however legislation enforcement didn’t act on any of it. These threats included particularly saying he was going to hold out a mass capturing and threatening to kill particular person individuals.

The reactionary nature of disarming Individuals as a result of deranged psychopaths kill individuals is harmful and solely serves to maintain the weapons out of the palms of legislation abiding residents because the above two circumstances illustrate. Furthermore, deranged psychopaths don’t even want weapons to trigger mass dying.

In keeping with a 2015 research, even when all weapons had been faraway from America, in a ten yr interval, 355 individuals nonetheless would’ve been murdered in mass killings. 

From 2006 to 2015, 140 individuals had been murdered by arsonists in mass fires, 104 had been stabbed in mass stabbings, and 92 individuals had been crushed to dying in mass killings. To reiterate, these are deaths by which 4 or extra individuals had been killed.

“Individuals sufficiently enraged to commit such crimes may be motivated to seek out different methods,” criminologist James Alan Fox of Northeastern College factors out.

Regardless of all this info on the contrary, the left and the best appear hell bent on refusing to let this tragedy “go to waste,” and are utilizing it to additional erode the rights of the 99.9999999 % of the harmless people who find themselves not murderous psychopaths. And all of it will likely be “authorized” — due course of and innocence be damned.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Clinton’s defense attorney was the latest Kavanaugh Accuser

Published

on

Clinton's defense attorney was the latest Kavanaugh Accuser

Following a New York Times report detailing new allegations of sexual misconduct against Justice Brett Kavanaugh of the Supreme Court, evidence has emerged that the latest accuser, Max Stier, used to work for the Clintons.

The Times published a story on Saturday pushing questionable claims that the genitals of Kavanaugh were thrown into the hand of a woman while drunk at a college party.

The allegation was not substantiated, and the supposed victim’s friends deny having any memory of the case.

Max Stier, a lawyer who represented both Bill and Hillary Clinton when Bill Clinton was charged with revealing himself to a girl in the 1990s, is the guy who says he witnessed the incident.

After Paula Jones accused him of exposing himself to her in a hotel room, Stier, a Democrat, represented President Bill Clinton. Clinton settled for $850,000 with Jones and for five years lost his law license.

Stier also worked closely with David Kendall, representing Hillary Clinton in the Whitewater investigation against allegations of illegal processing of classified information. On the other hand of the Clinton impeachment fight, Kavanaugh worked with Ken Starr. Kavanaugh had accused his opponents of “vengeance on behalf of the Clintons” during his confirmation hearings. This allegation seems to verify that.

Saraacarter.com reports: In a significant twist, NYTimes editorial was forced to create a correction to its bombshell tale about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh that the “presumed victim said she did not recall the supposed sexual assault in question at all.” Editors ‘ Note states: “An previous version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming novel, did not include one component of the novel. The book claims the woman student has refused to be interviewed and friends say she does not remember the incident. But NYTimes publishers also omitted another significant detail, that Max Stier, the accuser who “saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his trousers down at another drunken college party, where friends pushed his penis into the hands of a female student,” worked as a Clinton defense attorney, or Stier’s legal battles with Kavanaugh during the Whitewater investigation.

The only allegedly fresh statement created in the novel is not new and comes from Democrat lawyer Max Stier, a Kavanaugh’s Yale classmate with whom he has a lengthy and controversial history. During the Whitewater investigation in the 1990s when Kavanaugh worked for Independent Counsel Ken Starr, they were “matched” against each other in the words of the Yale Daily News. Stier defended President Bill Clinton, whose legal problems started when he was accused by a female of revealing herself to her in her hotel room. Clinton later settled for $850,000 with the lady and ended up losing his law license for five years due to a contempt of court summons for inaccurate testimony. Stier worked intimately with David Kendall, who continued to protect Hillary Clinton against accusations that classified information had been illegally handled. Kavanaugh’s reference to his opponents motivated by “vengeance on behalf of the Clintons” met with stupidity from the liberal media, despite the unusually big amount of Clinton-affiliated lawyers who continued to pop up during his confirmation hearings. (Excerpt from TheFederalist.com) NYTimes was forced to update its narrative only after The Federalist Mollie Hemingway flagged the omission of the article on Twitter: Democratic presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker and Julian Castro, among others, were quick to declare that Kavanaugh “must be impeached”

I was sitting through the hearings. Lied to the United States by Brett Kavanaugh. Senate and the American people most important. He was brought to court by a sham process and his position at the court is an insult to the pursuit of truth and justice.

Continue Reading

News

Trump: Hellbent Democrats to Eliminate ‘ God-given self-defense rights ‘

Published

on

Trump: Hellbent Democrats to Eliminate ' God-given self-defense rights '

President Trump slammed “radical” Democrats for attempting to remove weapons from law-abiding Americans.

During his rally in New Mexico on September 16, 2019, Trump warned of hellbent “radical left democrats” pushing laws, greater taxes, and free speech limitations.

He also advised that “Left Democrats want to confiscate your weapons and eliminate your God-given right to self-defense.” “As your president, I will never allow them to take away your freedom, your dignity,… and I will never, ever, enable them to take away your sacred right to bear weapons,” added Trump.

Reports from Breitbart.com: Breitbart News reported Trump’s warning on September 15, 2019 that Democrats want weapons to be “confiscated.”

CBS News quoted Trump as stating, “Democrats want to confiscate weapons from law-abiding Americans.” He added that any Democrat achievement in the confiscatory push means law-abiding people will be “completely defenseless when someone goes home with a gun.” On September 12, 2019, Breitbart News quoted Democrat presidential candidate Robert “Beto” O’Rourke as stating, “Hell yes, we’re going to bring yo with us.

Continue Reading

News

The Sex Tape Accuser Kevin Hart called him a Victim and Promised not to Sue.

Published

on

The sex tape accuser Kevin Hart called him a victim and promised not to sue.

Kevin Hart’s sex tape partner who lodged a lawsuit against him for $60 million said back when the tale broke first… Kevin was a victim, like her, and she wouldn’t sue him.

Montia Sabbag was on the side of lawyer Lisa Bloom as Bloom mentioned their case… That Kevin had no idea they were secretly filming their sexual liaison in a hotel suite in Las Vegas. Bloom also created the stance of Sabbag clear… She didn’t want Kevin’s cent— she wanted to hunt the perpetrator down and put him to justice.

Our sources claim a later Sabbag lawyer— her third— has lately made Kevin a secret economic demand… Asking for “low six figures,” it was dismissed by Kevin’s lawyer and offered no penny.

kevin

The story was broken by TMZ… That lawyer now replying to Sabbag has lodged a lawsuit against Hart and J.T for $60 million. Jackson— The former friend of Kevin who was detained for extortion and charged.

So, now Sabbag turned on Kevin, stating he was on it so he could get more advertising— odd, as even back then Kevin was one of the world’s largest film stars, and the last thing he required was media attention over cheating.

What’s more than that… First-hand information sources inform TMZ that Kevin has worked on the case with the District Attorney for two years. It seems strange that if he was secretly one of the perpetrators, he would be so engaged. “Kevin works a lot with the D.A. because J.T. f**ked him over,” as one source put it. We’re told Kevin, who’s recovering from horrific injuries as a result of his car crash, won’t pay Sabbag a penny. There is no going to be a settlement.

Continue Reading

News

UK Ban on Cats and Dogs blocked as ‘ offending ‘ Asian countries

Published

on

UK ban on cats and dogs blocked as ' offending ' Asian countries

The government has blocked a ban on eating dog and cat meat in the UK for fear of being’ culturally insensitive’ to South East Asian countries.

After a bill was drawn up to illegal dog or cat meat possession in the United Kingdom, civil servants jumped in to thwart the move.

The Ministry of Justice justified blocking the new rules, saying that telling other nations what they can and can not eat would be’ culturally insensitive’ to the British government, despite the reality that it would have no effect on South East Asian countries where dog and cat meat are eaten.

Summit News reported: “Dogs are creatures that accompany us. We don’t eat them, and that’s a very important message to send to the rest of the world, “Watling said.” It’s not culturally insensitive because we don’t tell them what to do–we’re just telling them what we’re doing, “he added, saying he was” amazed “by the objection from the MoJ.

Every year in China, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia, around 30 million animals are killed and consumed. Many are alive skinned and subjected to horrific torture.

Continue Reading

News

Tulsi Gabbard: Acting like ‘ B*tch ‘ of Saudi Arabia ‘

Published

on

Tulsi Gabbard: Acting like ' B*tch ' of Saudi Arabia '

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has criticized President Trump in reaction to the attacks on Saudi Arabia for threatening military action against Iran.

“Trump’s Saudi masters are awaiting instructions,” Gabbard tweeted.

“To have our nation behave as the bitch of Saudi Arabia is not’ America First.'” Mediaite.com reports: Gabbard’s tweet came in reaction to Trump stating the U.S. is “locked and loaded” in reaction to the Saudis assault.

“The supply of oil to Saudi Arabia has been assaulted,” Trump wrote. “There’s reason to think that we understand the guilty, that we’re locked and loaded based on the verification, but we’re waiting to hear from the Kingdom who they think was the cause of the assault, and how we’d continue!”The supply of oil to Saudi Arabia has been assaulted. There’s reason to think we understand the guilty, are locked and loaded depending on the verification, but we’re waiting to hear from the Kingdom who they think was the cause of this assault, and how we’d continue!


— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 15 September 2019 Gabbard’s own criticism of Middle East strategy has been addressed. In specific, for meeting the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad in 2017, she has come under fire.

The representative from Hawaii was mired in the Democratic race at about one percent. She has not qualified for the third Democratic discussion and is presently searching outside for the next October discussion.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending