Connect with us

News

Exposed and physically abused by Karl Dargan, Lil Mo opioid addiction!

Published

on

Exposed and physically abused by Karl Dargan, Lil Mo opioid addiction!

Cynthia Karen Loving a.k.a Lil Mo revealed she has opiate addiction and was a battered wife.

Lil Mo revealed in a long post on Tuesday via Instagram describing her drug addictions and harassment by her ex-husband, Karl Dargan who wanted her to die. She started posting with a text picture, “I never thought I could get off Opioids!””BUT | We ON THEY OF DID!!!!!!! The OPPS is a total insanity to say that I don’t have to wake up and pop a PLUS 30 addi, tramadol or anything else that the devil has brought into the room. I was MONEY. I was MONEY. Even the CAP won’t. So much has been spent paying bills to other people to be high and a working addict. Did I just let the TOXIC GO!!!! I’ve been waiting for this GLOW. 2020 will be a Good year for MY kids and I. I’ve got more things to let go of. To cut off so many more men. More old customs to stop. Yet I love you sooooo much for those who came to HELL OUT to GET me. “Lil Mo wrote on 3 December.

Exposed and physically abused by Karl Dargan, Lil Mo opioid addiction!

The star of reality says that she was now free of the opioid and that Karl Dargan physically abused her and took her to the court to seek refuge.

“I am GLOWING now. Clean b*tch, inside out. Was outside because I was abused physically. Finally, the judge granted my FULL PFA (abuse protection) which covers the entire world. CAP NO!!! I had this GO to have. I know I’m going to help others recover. “According to Lil Mo, she hit the bottom rock of her addiction and wanted to commit suicide.

Exposed and physically abused by Karl Dargan, Lil Mo opioid addiction!

When I hit the bottom, I was ashamed. I wanted so badly to die. But I was HIGH, and I could afford it if I thought it was OK. In LIL MO. I’m renowned. Well-known people do drugs. I heard the words “I’m going to blow your fcukin head off and throw you over the balcony” until that day! Then I was running for MY LIFE!! 9 months ago. 9 months ago. I didn’t look back!! I didn’t look back!! I am in such a peaceful situation that I do not want to interrupt it (save me, then put the oxygen mask on all) #glow#FNF the thing you are struggling with Don’t get into the new decade. Twenty-eight days away. You can leave NEOWWWWWW!! Don’t be embarrassed to empower himself. “Earlier this year, after he had caught a mysterious lady texting while taping Marriage Bootcamp, Lil Mo split from her husband, Karl Dargan. Soon afterwards, he was accused of stealing the Chuckie Cheese debit card at the time of the break-up.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

‘ Straight Up Communist Censorship ‘: Virginia Dems Push Bill to Free Speech Criminalization

Published

on

' Straight Up Communist Censorship ': Virginia Dems Push Bill to Free Speech Criminalization

Not only are the Virginia Democrats trying to dismantle the second amendment to the US Constitution, they are now trying to do away with the first amendment.

Even though on Monday, Virginia’s huge and strong gun rights rally failed to slow down its bid for dictatorship.

Then, they hit the trigger and pass a bill through the legislature to criminalize ways of opposition from Governor Ralph Northam and other state officials.

Delegate Jeffrey M. Bourne introduced House Bill 1627 last week. The law provides that, if the person who is a victim is a governor, Governor-elect, Lieutenant-Governor-elect, Attorney General or Attorney General-elect, a Member or an employee of the General Assembly, a judge of the Supreme Court of Virginia or a judge of the Court of Appeal of Virginia, there are some criminal offenses concerning threats and harassment in the City of Richmond.

“If any person who uses a computer or computer network to coercion, intimidate or harass any person, is guilty of a Class 1 malpractice, or is to use obscene, vulgar, profane, lazy or unlawful language or to make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature, or to threaten any illegal or immoral act.

The law would essentially also establish an Elite Ruling Class with additional legal rights in comparison to other residents.

This law states that it is applicable specifically to: “the Governor, governor-elect, governor-elect, lieutenant-governor-elect, the procurator-general or procurator-elect of the General Assembly, a member or staff, the judge of the Court of Appeal of Virginia or a judge of the Court of Appeals of Virginia.”

Tina Freitas, the wife of Republican Delegate Nick Freitas, in a Facebook post on Tuesday night, called attention to that tyrannical act.

“Wow, they’re after the 1A now! To protect yourself from criticism, Dems is trying to create special rules exclusively for the elite ruling class.”Fridas has written.

“What is abuse considered? Will Governor Infanticide / KKK Hood attempt to prevent accountability? Should we no longer demand justice for LG Fairfax’s suspected viol victims? This is communist censorship straight up!”She added.” She added.

The gun rights rally on Monday in the least did not dissuade Virginia Democrats. Just one day later, they passed red flag legislation through the legislature and then quashed Republicans’ pro-gun bills.

Philip Van Cleave, President of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, said that “The Governor and the leaders of the Democrats have war on law-abiding citizens and gun owners and today their votes confirm that we are going there.”

Continue Reading

News

Chinese top professor: Coronavirus could kill 50 million people all over the world

Published

on

Chinese top professor: Coronavirus could kill 50 million people all over the world

According to a professor at Oxford University, China’s deadly coronavirus could have the same death toll as Spanish flu and kill 50 million people all over the world.

On Wednesday, deaths from the virus grew to 17 with hundreds of confirmed cases, increasing concerns of widespread contagion and global pandemic.

Animal strain is believed to be the origin of the previously unknown flu-like coronavirus strain before it “jumped” over humans, when it came from an animal market in central Wuhan, with cases now reported as far as the US.

Yahoo report: The 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic is widely considered the “fatalest in history,” infecting about five hundred million people around the world, killing between twenty and fifty million.

Chinese officials have confirmed 440 cases with 17 deaths in 2019-nCoV of the new coronavirus strain.

The disease is said to have a 2 percent mortality rate, based on existing evidence. This means that one person is statistically killed in every 50 people who catch the infection.

To put it in context, around one in 1000 people who develop grip die, resulting in a 0.1 percent death rate.

Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London said: “This[ 2019-nCoV death rate] could be 2%, close to Spanish flu.”

University of Oxford Professor Peter Horby said that rates of fatality are based on “clinical data around hospital incidents.”

“15%-20% of those in hospital are severe cases,” described as ventilation required.

As a class, coronaviruses are widespread, leading to epidemics such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars).

2019-nCoV is thought to have come to humans from animals before “jumping.”

“New viruses spread faster because we don’t have immunity,” said Professor Ferguson.

Continue Reading

News

Bernie Sanders Hillary Clinton Slams “Nobody likes him”

Published

on

Hillary Clinton Slams Bernie Sanders “Nobody Likes Him”

Hillary Clinton has sparked a response by all sides, focusing on the’ liability’ of today’s Democrat leader Bernie Sanders.

Clinton, one of America’s most disliked presidential candidates, described her former rider as unlike and ineffective.

Reporter Clinton stated in an interview with Hollywood that “Nobody wants to work with him” in the Senate.

TR reports: while Sanders and Russia, former FBI director James Comey, WikiLeaks, actress Susan Sarandon, and dozens of other organizations long blame for their electoral loss in 2016, Tuesday’s assault is on the heels of several polls placing Sanders at the forefront of the 2020 major demographics pack.

Controversially enough, Clinton said at least in the antichrist-like faction that Trump has taken on supernatural characteristics, she would not commit herself to endorsing Sanders when he was chosen to face President Donald Trump at the 2020 general election. “I won’t go there yet” she said in answer to questions about whether she’d’ vote blue no importe qui,’ after eviscerating her former Senate colleague as “career politician,” who had “gotten nothing done.” Clinton made a point of pursuing followers of the Senator of Vermont–denouncing his “online Bernie Bros.”
If she recalled the plan of her long-standing strategist David Brock in 2016 to send legions of paid’ Barrier Breakers’ to target supporters of Sanders in social media, or just hope the reader had overlooked this hideous episode, was not quite obvious. However, the Sanders campaign was never accused of paying bots to discredit the rivals of the Senator.

Clinton repeated Senator Elizabeth Warren’s far-away assertion, even while attacking the Sanders campaign as a divisive, that Sanders said a woman couldn’t be president. Warren was crying out before the recent Democratic debate that shook out the unprecedented harmony between the two candidates when she all but called him a liar to his face on national television. Clinton told the nation that she won the popular vote against Trump, a familiar line which Sanders himself used to defend against the accusation of Warren.

Social media analysts pointed out that Clinton may not want Sanders to go “likability” head-to-head. Vermont’s Democratic Socialist was ranked highest in the most recent Senate poll by Morning Consult, while Clinton itself was hated by over one-half the electorate, even as she ran against Trump.

Others pointed out that “likability” is at best abstract, and at worst meaningless, as one moves within the circles of Clinton.

“Nobody likes him,” said the politician who was on vacation at Epstein and went to Trump’s wedding, whose husband was on the floor two dozen times, Ghislane’s daughter at her wedding, and Ivanka’s friends. Being “liked” is not a virtue when you’re that strong.

— David Klion on January 21, 2020 (@DavidKlion).

Continue Reading

News

Hillary Clinton Defends Years Long Harvey Weinstein Association

Published

on

Hillary Clinton Defends Years Long Harvey Weinstein Association

Hillary Clinton refuses to be accused of receiving the money from one of her best-known donors–disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein–as she calms that she did not know anything about his alleged sexual misconduct.

Weinstein, who will stand trial on the charges of rape and rape, has long been a leading contributor to the Democratic Party and is reported to have raised Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign for over $1.4 million.

While Clinton claims she did not know the charges against Weinstein, some say she was well educated.

Comments from RT: “How could we know?”Former state secretary and loss presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said in an interview Tuesday to the Hollywood reporter when he was asked to rape the film producer Harvey Weinstein.

In 2017, the creator ‘ Pulp Fiction’ was’ touted’ when the New York Times published a story outlining Weinstein’s various claims over the years of sexual harassment. Prominent actresses such as Uma Thurman, Gwyneth Paltrow, Rose McGowan, and others put forth Weinstein allegations that either exploit or threaten them.

Clinton claimed that she didn’t cash the checks if she knew anything about the man’s alleged acts.

“And, of course, it would have affected our behavior if we all knew what we know now,” she said. She also pointed out that Weinstein gave donations to other prominent Democrats such as Barack Obama.

For several factors, Clinton’s words ring hollow. Although she can claim she did not know the accusations against Weinstein, several people have said that employees around Clinton and her presidential campaign in 2016 were in fact made aware.

The New York Times told’ Girls ‘ actress and author, Lena Dunham, that she warned Clinton against any fundraising.

“I only want you to tell you Harvey is a rapist and this will come out,” Dunham reminded the campaign staff.
“I think it’s really a bad idea for him to host and be interested in fundraising because Hollywood is an open secret of him having sexual harassment issues.” Journalist Tina Brown also said she warned about the initiative.

“I heard that since Harvey left Talk in 2002 her sleepiness with women had escalated and that she was unwise to associate herself with him so closely,” she said to the Times.

Those threats were just some of Weinstein’s bad mouth before the Times exposed him. Several actors openly mocked Hollywood’s stillness on his relations with celebrities and refused to work with him, including Vincent Gallo, as well as others, including Seth MacFarlane.

Ronan Farrow, the man behind Weinstein’s initial presentation, already said that Nick Merrill, the Clinton publicist, tried to persuade him not to run his Weinstein article.

In his book ‘ Catch and Kill,’ Farrow claimed that in the summer of 2017 Merill informed him that the expose of Weinstein was “concernful to us.” At the time the Times story about Weinstein came down, the producer worked on a film about Clinton.

Nevertheless, Clinton leaves Weinstein and claims to be ignored— not a great strategy for someone who looks like a leader of any kind.

Continue Reading

News

French Intellectual Sentenced to Prison for Calling Mass Immigration an “Invasion”

Published

on

French Intellectual Sentenced to Prison for Calling Mass Immigration an “Invasion”

The French philosopher, Renaud Camus, was granted a 2 Month prison sentence for claiming that mass immigration in Europe is “invasion.” Camus would simply avoid incarceration by donating EUR 1800 to two “anti-racist” groups, SOS Racisme and LICRA.

The writer, who is the author of Le Grands Remplacement (The Great Replacement), was accused of “public instigation to hate or violence on the basis of birth, religion, nationality or sex” and convicted by Camus of “immigration has become a debate in Colombey-les-deux-Churches in November 2017”

Camus said that mass immigration is “the substitution, a propensity to substitute everything with its emulator: the original with its clone, the real with its emulation, the true with the fake, the mothers with the substituted mothers, and the society with independence and entertainment.” Many of these terrorists have been radicalized by mosques which avoid some police investigation, but Camus has to be prosecuted for his opinion crime.

So you got it there. Freedom of speech in France is now a felony.

Continue Reading

Popular Searches

Trending