Historian Niall Ferguson slammed Greta Thunberg in Davos and wondered why “I don’t see her in Beijing or London” and her climate change hypocrisy. Ferguson, the Stanford University Hoover Institution Senior Fellow, questioned why the appeal of young activists is not targeted at the main polluters in the world.

So why are the big polluters ignored?

Summit News reports: Teenage environmentalist Thunberg spoke at yesterday’s global confab, in which she said, “Our House remains on fire. Summit News reports. Your actions fuel the flames every hour. We are still asking you to be in distress and live as though you cherished your children first of all. “Thunberg added,” We don’t want to do such stuff in 2050, 2030, or even 2021. Ferguson, a senior fellow at Stanford Hoover University, wondered why Thunberg was not delivering his letter to the biggest polluters on the planet.

“60% of CO2 pollution from the birth of Greta Thunberg can be traced to China… but no one speaks about it. They talk like its Europeans and Americans who will fix this problem somehow… which is frustrating because it’s not at the heart, “Ferguson said.

“We have to restrict China and India if you are concerned about reducing CO2 emissions and rising temperatures,” said he. He noted that while Greta is traveling to New York and Davos, “I do not see her either in Beijing or Delhi.” Ferguson was right. Consider the United Kingdom, for example.

“The UK has peaked its CO2 emissions in 1973 and are now at its lowest level since Victorian times,” the Spectator reports. “Since then, air pollution has declined and sulphur dioxide levels have dropped by 95%. The population of Britain is increasing, but our consumption of energy in 2001 peaked and has since dropped by 19%.

Health experts predicted that tens of millions of people around the world could have been killed three months ahead of the deadly outbreak in China in a warning.

Scientists of Johns Hopkins Health Center modeled how a deadly coronavirus would occur if it reached a pandemic level.

The analysis, in cooperation with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, considered what would happen if a pandemic was founded at Brazilian pig farms.

The hypothetical scenario estimated that in 18 months 65 million people from all over the world will die.

The Mail Online reports: Dr. Eric Toner, a senior researcher at Johns Hopkins, told the Wuhan outbreak news of the coronavirus in late December that he was not shocked.

I thought for a long time to have a coronavirus as the most likely virus to cause a new pandemic,’ he told Business Insider.

We still don’t know how contagious this is. We know it’s spread person to person, but we don’t know how much.

A first impression is that it is considerably milder than SARS. So that’s trustworthy. It can be more transmissible than SARS, on the other hand, at least in the community setting. Coronaviruses are respiratory tract illnesses that can lead to disorders such as pneumonic plague and the common cold.

The epidemic of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China, which injured 8,000 people and killed 774 in the early 2000s, was also responsible. one.

Dr. Toner’s computer simulation indicated that almost every country in the world would have coronavirus infections after six months.

65 million people could die in 18 months. The Wuhan epidemic is not a pandemic, but the virus has been identified in 10 different countries.

The confirmed cases have been in the United States, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Singapore, Hong Kong, Macau, and Nepal.

Dr. Toner’s simulation invented a fake virus known as the CAPS-a pandemic rooted in the hypothetical scenario in the pig farms of Brazil.

The Toner strain would be immune to any conventional vaccine.
It would be more dangerous than SARS, but as easy to catch as the grippe.

His computer-modeled outbreak started small, with farmers getting a fever or pneumonia-like symptoms.

It then extends to impoverished and vulnerable neighborhoods in South America.

The airlines were suspended and bookings for flying were halved.  The Bill and the Melinda Gates Foundation–which only happens to support the company that owns the patent for the deadly virus–are already working on a vaccine, Dr Anthonie Fauci of the National Institutes of Allergie and Infectious Diseases said it would take a few months to get the vaccine.

In what was perceived as an assault against Greta Thunberg, a young climate activist, US President Donald Trump targeted environmental’ alarmists’ and’ doom prophets’ at the opening day of the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Davos Trump’s climate confrontation said that it was “a time for hope” and that he was “a big environmental believer.” Thunberg responded by urging immediate action and said Trump’s climate commitment was “now not near enough.”

RT reports: The two heavyweights of the environmental debate carried with them their divergent views: trump’s suspicious optimism that the planet isn’t about to burst into flames, and Greta’s dystopian warnings of its boiling.

ICYMI’s Rite The two messages are taken into consideration.

Hackers stolen Ghislaine Maxwell’s private emails, which prompted fears among the powerful elite of exposure of their crimes.

The British marxist Maxwell is regarded as a child procurer to Epstein and his wealthy VIP associates, including politicians, millionaire Hollywoods and members of the Royal British family.

Maxwell, who is connected with powerful people like Prince Andrew and the Clintons, stolen emails.

The hack was unveiled by lawyers representing Maxwell in Epstein’s sex-slave Virginia Roberts Guiffre’s defamation case.

Pagesix.com reports: Maxwell’s attorneys, who were previously charged with having imagined the deceased pedophile, said hackers were “victimizing” their machine— because they never scrubbed their email address off a database that was unsealed by 2,000.

In a letter to the federal judge Loretta Preska in Manhattan on 5 December, her legal team squarely blame the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York for the huge paper dumping.

“Despite the best efforts of the Second Circuit, serious errors have been committed,” the letter said. “For example, in one place it wrote the name of a non-party, but no other; so the media got access to that name instantly. Another example is edits of Mrs. Maxwell’s email (linked to her own domain name) at one location but not at another; hackers have violated the host computer shortly thereafter. “In 2015, Maxwell reportedly exchanged emails with Prince Andrew about Virginia’s Roberts Giuffre, who claimed she was three times forced to sleep with the royal.

He denied the allegations that he had never met Giuffre.

According to the Telegraph, Maxwell developed its own private mail server via a New York-based website, which was registered under the apparent pseudonym Jennifer Turner.

In the coming weeks, a judge is scheduled to determine whether 8,600 more judicial records filed in a civil law case against Maxwell and Giuffre will be disguised.

A Maxwell spokesperson would not tell the Telegraph if her e-mails were hacked or the hackers found.

Maxwell was not criminally charged, although its suspected involvement in Epstein’s sex trafficking network has been investigated by the feds.

In August after he was arrested on charges of alleged sexual harassment of young girls, Epstein committed suicide in prison.

At least two of the Carter Page surveillance warrants were not legally authorized, the FISC acknowledged in a secret order.

In its order dated 7 January, which was not announced and issued until Thursday, President of the FISA Judge James Boasberg wrote that the last two FISA warrants were invalid on Carter Page dated 7 April 2017 and 29 June 2017.

The Gatewaypundit.com reports: Former DAG Rod Rosenstein and FBI former deputy director Andrew McCabe signed the FISA warrant in June 2017.

Rosenstein signed a FISA warrant in June 2017 a month after it wrote a note approving special counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment— and STILL REDACTED were 20 pages of this FISA query.

Did Robert Mueller personally use information collected on the Carter Page in real time?

If so, Mueller’s argument against the Trump officials may pose a big problem because the wiretaps are now legally invalid.

“For almost 6 weeks after Mueller’s appointment, the final three-month authorisation to spy on Page was signed so that Mueller could have obtained and used almost five months of Page surveillance in real time during Mueller’s investigation. If his office used some information in subsequent cases, it could possibly annul previous or future convictions sought by Mueller’s office to make declarations stating that the final two spy warrants were invalid against Page, “Sean Davis of The Federalist wrote.

In his order Judge James Boasberg, the current federal judge in charge of the FISA court, said that at least two of four FISA warrants were improperly issued against Carter Page. In fact, according to its order, after issuing a detailed report on the matter by the General Inspector of the department, the Department of Justice also determined that the government had no likely cause for Page’s working as a foreign power agent. The rule of FISA specifies that Americans can not be spied upon secretly by the U.S. government without probable cause based on valid proof that an American behaves improperly as a foreign agent.

In its order of 7 January, Boasberg ordered DOJ to retain and secure the information and evidence pertains both to the applications made by Carter Page and to the inspector general investigation of the abuse of FISA, as well as to any further investigations by the DOJ related to or produced by the reports of the inspector general. Boasberg informed DOJ not later than 28 January to provide the FISA court with all the information requested.

“The Department of Justice assesses that there has been a lack of prediction in the application for Docket Number 17-375 and Docket Number 17-679,’ if not earlier, it is probable reason for believing the[ carter] page was acting as a foreign power agent’,” wrote Boasberg referring to the final two of the four FISA requests to spy on Page. “Because of the factual errors and omissions the Court acknowledges that the government decided that the court’s authorizations were not appropriate in Docket Numbers 17-375 and 17-679.” Boasberg says the DOJ also assesses whether the first two FISA warrants were obtained illegally in Carter.

Carter Page’s first FISA warrant was issued in October 2016 and its second in January 2017.

In his order Boasberg also claimed that for any federal official, it is a federal offense to’ intendedly divulge[] or use[] information obtained in color of legislation through electronic monitoring, knowing, or having reason to know that this information was obtained through non-authorized electro-monitoring.’