Connect with us


Lisa Murkowski, nominee of the Supreme Court Amy Coney Barrett



Lisa Murkowski, nominee of the Supreme Court Amy Coney Barrett
google news

The Senate will vote on the selection of Amy Coney Barrett on Monday and, if so, Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski will join her Republican colleagues in voting for her.

Murkowski said before President Donald Trump nominated Barrett that she would not vote for any member of the Supreme Court prior to the presidential election. But Judge Barrett had a good hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she had demonstrated her brilliant legal mind and had the support of a majority of Americans.

On Sunday, she will vote against taking the appointment to a procedural obstacle because of her long-standing opposition to confirming justice too close to the presidential election of Nov. 3, but she will vote for Judge Barrett on Monday.

SIGN THE PETITION: vote to confirm the nomination of the Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett

“I have decided that she is the kind of person we want at the Supreme Court,” Murkowski said to Barrett. “While I condemn the mechanism that has brought us to this point, I do not condemn it.”

The decision of Murkowski to eventually support Barrett leaves Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) as the only Republican to vote against Barrett. Collins did not change her stance against voting on any appointment and said that her vote had to do with the procedure and not with the expertise or credentials of Judge Barrett.

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously on Thursday 12-0 to submit Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the full Senate floor after Democrats boycotted the committee’s vote to partake in a political truce and falsely say that Judge Barrett intends to take away American health care.

Senator Ben Sasse, a Nebraska member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was one of the Republicans who voted to move Judge Barrett’s appointment to the floor for a full vote.

“Judge Barrett ran circles around the Democrats’ failed efforts to smear her integrity, her religion, and her family during those hearings. They don’t like Judge Barrett doing what the judges are meant to do – standing above politics and refusing to legislate from the bench. The polls show that the Americans are clearly in favour of her confirmation. It’s time for Chuck Schumer to drop the shenanigans and get that done, “he said.

A leading pro-life organization told that it was pleased that the panel voted to approve President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee for confirmation to the Supreme Court.

“Today’s vote is a historic victory for the pro-life movement, particularly for pro-life women, as Amy Barrett moves one step closer to the seat of the nation’s highest court,” said SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “Last week’s hearings, Judge Barrett’s immense intelligence, and principled constitutionalist ideology shone through the hours of interrogation. In the face of pro-abortion fear-warning Democrats and their media allies’ assaults on their Catholic religion, she has displayed grace and integrity. There is no doubt that Barrett is extraordinarily eligible to serve on the Supreme Court.

“We are so thankful to President Trump, Leader McConnell, Chairman Graham, and all of our allies on the Judiciary Committee for their loyalty to Judge Barrett during this process. In addition, pro-life senators took the opportunity to commit an offence and teach America about the extremism of Roe v. Wade. We thank them all and look forward to seeing Barrett confirmed by the full Senate, “she added.

The news comes after a recent national poll reveals that Americans favour Amy Coney Barrett, candidate of the Supreme Court, by a 23 per cent margin. It follows a Gallup poll showing that the majority of Americans support her appointment.

The latest Morning Consult poll reveals that the Americans favour Barrett at a margin of 51-28% and that the gap in 23 percentage points is an improvement from the 17 percent margin found in the previous poll.

“After four days of hearings, 51% of the electorate said that the Senate should vote to confirm Barrett to the Supreme Court, up 3 percentage points from the previous week and a rise of 14 points since Trump announced his appointment on September 26. It is a higher degree of support than Morning Consult calculated at any time during the confirmation hearings for Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — the two other lawyers Trump had been named to the High Court during his term of office, “the polling firm said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is due to vote on Thursday, setting up a final vote by the full Senate on Monday.

At the confirmation hearings, Judge Barrett says that she does not consider the decision of Roe v. Wade that allowed abortion on demand to be a “super-precedent” that can not be reversed.

Judge Barrett said that Roe was not in the same category as the Brown v. Board of Education decision of the Supreme Court in 1954, which ruled that segregated public schools were unconstitutional because there was still a major controversy as to whether Roe was valid.

In comments during the confirmation process, Judge Amy Coney Barrett also indicated that she is committed to the rule of law.

“I am committed to the rule of law and the rule of the court,” she said. “If I offer off-the-cuff responses, I’d practically be a juror, and I don’t think we want judges to be jurors. I think we want judges to take a thoughtful and open-minded approach to cases.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett gave her opening remarks to the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday and made two primary points.

First, she spoke about the proper position of the courts, saying that they are not allowed to make laws and make laws from the bench. She also refused to back down to the attacks on her religion by the Senate Democrats, stating that she firmly believed in prayer and thanking the many Americans who prayed for her in the midst of the attacks on her Christian faith.

“I believe in the power of prayer, and it has been exhilarating that so many people have been praying for me,” Judge Barrett said to the representatives of the Judiciary.

“Nothing is more important to me, and I am so proud to have it behind me,” she said.

Before that, Judge Barrett had addressed the proper position of the Supreme Court.

“The courts are not intended to fix every problem or every wrong in our lives,” she explained. “The political decisions and the government’s value assessments must be taken by the political branches elected and accountable to the people. The public does not expect the courts to do this, and the courts should not try.

“When I write a case-solving opinion, I read every word from the point of view of the losing party. I ask myself how would I see the decision if one of my children was the faction I ruled against, “she went on to say. “Although I may not like the outcome, may I accept that the decision was reasonably well-founded and based on the law? That’s the standard I set for myself in any case, and that’s the standard I’m going to follow as long as I’m a judge at any court.

The Liberal American Bar Association has nominated its highest rating to President Donald Trump‘s most recent Supreme Court, releasing the rating on the opening day of its Supreme Court confirmation hearings in the Senate.

Last week, a recent national poll found that Americans favored the double-digit margin nomination of the Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

A recent Morning Consult poll reveals that the Americans support Barrett on a 46-31 percent basis and that 15 percent of the support basis is an improvement from the polling firms’ last national survey in September following its appointment. That poll had Americans backing Barrett 37-34%, which resulted in a 12 percent rise from the previous 3 percent margin.

“Democrats are losing the Supreme Court message battle, according to a new survey, with the help of Judge Amy Coney Barrett ‘s confirmation in the direction of the GOP,” the polling firm said. “Approximately half (46 percent) of the voters in the Oct. 2-4 Morning Consult / Politico poll said the Senate should approve Barrett — up 9 percent after President Donald Trump announced his appointment on Sept. 26—as more voters say the House should consider raising Barrett to the High Court as soon as possible, regardless of who wins the election next month.”

Seventy-seven percent of GOP voters support Barrett’s confirmation, up 6 points from the end of last month. Among the independents, the share that said it should be confirmed increased by 8 points to 36%, while the share of Democratic voters who said it should be confirmed increased by 10 points to 24%.

Even Democratic voters have relaxed their resistance to Barrett’s confirmation: the most recent survey showed that 59% said the Senate should wait to see who wins the election, compared to 79% who, after Ginsburg’s death, said that the next court should be selected by the election winner.

It’s not as if Barrett’s appointment was flying totally under the radar. While 1 in 5 voters initially heard “a lot” about it, that share had doubled just a few days later after the first presidential debate.

Barrett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame and judge at the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, argues that life starts at conception and has acknowledged that both pro-life and pro-abortion legal scholars have opposed Roe v. Wade as a poor judgment. Barrett criticized the decision for “ignit[ing] national uproar” on the basis of judicial fiat.

While her court decisions on abortion are few, she ruled in favor of two Indiana pro-life laws during her tenure on the Seventh Circuit. She also made a variety of claims regarding the importance of babies in the womb. In 2015, according to the Law and Crime Site, Barrett signed a public letter underlining “the importance of human life from conception to natural death.”

Judge Amy Barrett was number one on the Supreme Court wish list among most pro-life voters, and she was also the first future high court candidate to have an in-person meeting with President Donald Trump. This is not shocking given that the previous President said that he was “saving her” for appointment to the Supreme Court should Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg retire or pass away.

google news