Connect with us

News

Lisa Murkowski, nominee of the Supreme Court Amy Coney Barrett

Published

on

Lisa Murkowski, nominee of the Supreme Court Amy Coney Barrett

The Senate will vote on the selection of Amy Coney Barrett on Monday and, if so, Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski will join her Republican colleagues in voting for her.

Murkowski said before President Donald Trump nominated Barrett that she would not vote for any member of the Supreme Court prior to the presidential election. But Judge Barrett had a good hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she had demonstrated her brilliant legal mind and had the support of a majority of Americans.

On Sunday, she will vote against taking the appointment to a procedural obstacle because of her long-standing opposition to confirming justice too close to the presidential election of Nov. 3, but she will vote for Judge Barrett on Monday.

SIGN THE PETITION: vote to confirm the nomination of the Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett

“I have decided that she is the kind of person we want at the Supreme Court,” Murkowski said to Barrett. “While I condemn the mechanism that has brought us to this point, I do not condemn it.”

The decision of Murkowski to eventually support Barrett leaves Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) as the only Republican to vote against Barrett. Collins did not change her stance against voting on any appointment and said that her vote had to do with the procedure and not with the expertise or credentials of Judge Barrett.

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously on Thursday 12-0 to submit Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment to the full Senate floor after Democrats boycotted the committee’s vote to partake in a political truce and falsely say that Judge Barrett intends to take away American health care.

Senator Ben Sasse, a Nebraska member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was one of the Republicans who voted to move Judge Barrett’s appointment to the floor for a full vote.

“Judge Barrett ran circles around the Democrats’ failed efforts to smear her integrity, her religion, and her family during those hearings. They don’t like Judge Barrett doing what the judges are meant to do – standing above politics and refusing to legislate from the bench. The polls show that the Americans are clearly in favour of her confirmation. It’s time for Chuck Schumer to drop the shenanigans and get that done, “he said.

A leading pro-life organization told LifeNews.com that it was pleased that the panel voted to approve President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee for confirmation to the Supreme Court.

“Today’s vote is a historic victory for the pro-life movement, particularly for pro-life women, as Amy Barrett moves one step closer to the seat of the nation’s highest court,” said SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. “Last week’s hearings, Judge Barrett’s immense intelligence, and principled constitutionalist ideology shone through the hours of interrogation. In the face of pro-abortion fear-warning Democrats and their media allies’ assaults on their Catholic religion, she has displayed grace and integrity. There is no doubt that Barrett is extraordinarily eligible to serve on the Supreme Court.

“We are so thankful to President Trump, Leader McConnell, Chairman Graham, and all of our allies on the Judiciary Committee for their loyalty to Judge Barrett during this process. In addition, pro-life senators took the opportunity to commit an offence and teach America about the extremism of Roe v. Wade. We thank them all and look forward to seeing Barrett confirmed by the full Senate, “she added.

The news comes after a recent national poll reveals that Americans favour Amy Coney Barrett, candidate of the Supreme Court, by a 23 per cent margin. It follows a Gallup poll showing that the majority of Americans support her appointment.

The latest Morning Consult poll reveals that the Americans favour Barrett at a margin of 51-28% and that the gap in 23 percentage points is an improvement from the 17 percent margin found in the previous poll.

“After four days of hearings, 51% of the electorate said that the Senate should vote to confirm Barrett to the Supreme Court, up 3 percentage points from the previous week and a rise of 14 points since Trump announced his appointment on September 26. It is a higher degree of support than Morning Consult calculated at any time during the confirmation hearings for Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — the two other lawyers Trump had been named to the High Court during his term of office, “the polling firm said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is due to vote on Thursday, setting up a final vote by the full Senate on Monday.

At the confirmation hearings, Judge Barrett says that she does not consider the decision of Roe v. Wade that allowed abortion on demand to be a “super-precedent” that can not be reversed.

Judge Barrett said that Roe was not in the same category as the Brown v. Board of Education decision of the Supreme Court in 1954, which ruled that segregated public schools were unconstitutional because there was still a major controversy as to whether Roe was valid.

In comments during the confirmation process, Judge Amy Coney Barrett also indicated that she is committed to the rule of law.

“I am committed to the rule of law and the rule of the court,” she said. “If I offer off-the-cuff responses, I’d practically be a juror, and I don’t think we want judges to be jurors. I think we want judges to take a thoughtful and open-minded approach to cases.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett gave her opening remarks to the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday and made two primary points.

First, she spoke about the proper position of the courts, saying that they are not allowed to make laws and make laws from the bench. She also refused to back down to the attacks on her religion by the Senate Democrats, stating that she firmly believed in prayer and thanking the many Americans who prayed for her in the midst of the attacks on her Christian faith.

“I believe in the power of prayer, and it has been exhilarating that so many people have been praying for me,” Judge Barrett said to the representatives of the Judiciary.

“Nothing is more important to me, and I am so proud to have it behind me,” she said.

Before that, Judge Barrett had addressed the proper position of the Supreme Court.

“The courts are not intended to fix every problem or every wrong in our lives,” she explained. “The political decisions and the government’s value assessments must be taken by the political branches elected and accountable to the people. The public does not expect the courts to do this, and the courts should not try.

“When I write a case-solving opinion, I read every word from the point of view of the losing party. I ask myself how would I see the decision if one of my children was the faction I ruled against, “she went on to say. “Although I may not like the outcome, may I accept that the decision was reasonably well-founded and based on the law? That’s the standard I set for myself in any case, and that’s the standard I’m going to follow as long as I’m a judge at any court.

The Liberal American Bar Association has nominated its highest rating to President Donald Trump‘s most recent Supreme Court, releasing the rating on the opening day of its Supreme Court confirmation hearings in the Senate.

Last week, a recent national poll found that Americans favored the double-digit margin nomination of the Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.

A recent Morning Consult poll reveals that the Americans support Barrett on a 46-31 percent basis and that 15 percent of the support basis is an improvement from the polling firms’ last national survey in September following its appointment. That poll had Americans backing Barrett 37-34%, which resulted in a 12 percent rise from the previous 3 percent margin.

“Democrats are losing the Supreme Court message battle, according to a new survey, with the help of Judge Amy Coney Barrett ‘s confirmation in the direction of the GOP,” the polling firm said. “Approximately half (46 percent) of the voters in the Oct. 2-4 Morning Consult / Politico poll said the Senate should approve Barrett — up 9 percent after President Donald Trump announced his appointment on Sept. 26—as more voters say the House should consider raising Barrett to the High Court as soon as possible, regardless of who wins the election next month.”

Seventy-seven percent of GOP voters support Barrett’s confirmation, up 6 points from the end of last month. Among the independents, the share that said it should be confirmed increased by 8 points to 36%, while the share of Democratic voters who said it should be confirmed increased by 10 points to 24%.

Even Democratic voters have relaxed their resistance to Barrett’s confirmation: the most recent survey showed that 59% said the Senate should wait to see who wins the election, compared to 79% who, after Ginsburg’s death, said that the next court should be selected by the election winner.

It’s not as if Barrett’s appointment was flying totally under the radar. While 1 in 5 voters initially heard “a lot” about it, that share had doubled just a few days later after the first presidential debate.

Barrett, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame and judge at the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, argues that life starts at conception and has acknowledged that both pro-life and pro-abortion legal scholars have opposed Roe v. Wade as a poor judgment. Barrett criticized the decision for “ignit[ing] national uproar” on the basis of judicial fiat.

While her court decisions on abortion are few, she ruled in favor of two Indiana pro-life laws during her tenure on the Seventh Circuit. She also made a variety of claims regarding the importance of babies in the womb. In 2015, according to the Law and Crime Site, Barrett signed a public letter underlining “the importance of human life from conception to natural death.”

Judge Amy Barrett was number one on the Supreme Court wish list among most pro-life voters, and she was also the first future high court candidate to have an in-person meeting with President Donald Trump. This is not shocking given that the previous President said that he was “saving her” for appointment to the Supreme Court should Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg retire or pass away.

google news

News

Fans carry Morgan Wallen to 3 Billboard Music Awards following the ban and deplatforming due to a leaked N-Word video.

Published

on

Morgan Wallen

Morgan Wallen, a country music singer, received numerous big awards at the Billboard Music Awards ceremony on Sunday despite being barred from the festival and barred from several music platforms.

After a video of an inebriated Wallen calling a friend a “p****-a** n*****” surfaced online in February, his talent agent dropped him and his music was banned from outlets such as SiriusXM and Pandora. Wallen has since apologised for using the slur, which occurred late at night in Nashville “on hour 72 of a bender.”

Wallen was barred from attending the 2021 Billboard Music Awards as a result of the event. However, he was not barred from being nominated for major awards and nominations are based on his position on Billboard charts as well as his album sales and downloads on streaming platforms.

According to E! News, Wallen was nominated in six categories on Sunday and won awards for Top Country Artist, Top Country Male Artist, and Top Country Album for “Dangerous: The Double Album.”

In April, Dick Clark Productions issued a statement stating that, although Wallen was barred from attending the 2021 Billboard Awards, the production company will consider lifting the ban for upcoming shows.

google news
Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Ron DeSantis Signs Big Tech Bill: ‘These Platforms Have Become Our Public Square’

Published

on

American Conservative Union Holds Annual Conference In Florida

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) signed legislation on Monday that reins back large tech giants while also supporting consumers who feel they have been wrongly discriminated against.

At a ceremony in Miami, DeSantis signed the measure, which he described as the first of its kind in the United States. His office sent the following statement in response to the bill:

Both Floridians who have been handled poorly by Big Tech platforms will be able to sue businesses who break this legislation and receive punitive damages. This reform protects every Floridian’s interests by forcing social networking sites to be clear regarding their content management processes and provide consumers with adequate notification of revisions to such policies, preventing Big Tech bureaucrats from “changing the goalposts” to censor opposing viewpoints.
Under Florida’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the Attorney General can file a lawsuit against technology firms who breach this statute. If social media sites are found to have broken antitrust laws, they will be barred from doing business with any government agency. The “antitrust violator” blacklist has real implications for the bottom lines of Big Tech oligopolies.
Big Tech is not allowed to deplatform Floridian election candidates. The Florida Election Commission will charge any social media firm that de-platforms any nominee for statewide office $250,000 a day, and $25,000 a day for de-platforming candidates for non-statewide offices. Any Floridian will block any candidate they do not wish to hear from, and this is a privilege that any resident has — it is not up to Big Tech giants to judge.

In his remarks at the ceremony, DeSantis said that the dominance exercised by Silicon Valley tech giants has exceeded that of the early twentieth-century monopolies that sparked U.S. antitrust rules, and that the tech companies have become a modern “public square.” He chastised tech behemoths like Twitter and Facebook for “suppressing thoughts that are either inconvenient to the narrative or in which they individually disagree.” In part, DeSantis stated:

When our nation was founded and the Constitution was written, the founding fathers were worried with challenges to liberty mainly arising from government authority, and they feared that concentrations of power would eventually lead to the curtailment of people’s liberties. So they created a constitution of division of authority, checks and balances, and that was intended to establish a democracy that could do the stuff that a government wanted to do, but did so in a manner that was as safe as possible and had as many different checks and balances along the way so that power could not accumulate in one section of the government. And I think they were very wise in doing so, because we’ve seen what happens in other communities when such safeguards aren’t in place, and the consequences are unavoidably catastrophic.

But now we find ourselves in a circumstance that the founding fathers might not have predicted. Whereas the First Amendment was established to protect people’s freedom of speech, religion, and association from government overreach, we now have a situation in which some of these massive, massive companies in Silicon Valley are exerting a power over our population that has no precedent in American history, and I would suggest monopolies now, these big tech monopolies are exerting way more power than monopolies in the past. So we’ve arrived at a point where these outlets have become our public square.

Floridians and other Americans use these sites to exchange ideas. Heck, if you look back to the inception of these networks, they were also very empowering because you had corporate media, the news sources, which many Americans came to hate, and rightly so. They no longer had the intelligence monopoly. You could potentially bypass the legacy media to exchange facts on these channels, which was very beneficial to millions and millions of Americans. Actually, it was a bit too constructive, which irritated the powers that be, and so I believe what we’ve seen in recent years is a turn away from internet outlets, social media platforms, from being liberating agents to now being enforcers of orthodoxy. As a result, it seems that their main task, or one of their primary missions, is to eradicate concepts that are either inconvenient to the narrative or in which they personally disagree.

google news
Continue Reading

News

US reaches out to Palestinian leaders many angrily reject

Published

on

palestine

Following weeks of violence and a crippling 11-day war in Gaza, the United States and the international community want to negotiate with Palestinians in order to restart peace efforts.

However, when US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visits on Tuesday, he will meet with Palestinian leaders who have been sidelined by demonstrations and outmanoeuvred by the militant Hamas group — and who seem to be more hated by Palestinians than at any point during their long rule.

The Palestinian Authority is no closer to statehood than it was when Mahmoud Abbas, now 85, was elected president after Yasser Arafat’s death in 2005, and Palestinians are even more fragmented. When it seemed that his splintering Fatah faction would face an embarrassing loss, Abbas called off the first elections in 15 years last month.

The PA, on the other hand, retains strong strategic relations with Israel and is strongly committed to the principle of a two-state solution. Internationally, this is seen as the best way to end the crisis, despite the fact that no meaningful peace negotiations have taken place in more than a decade.

The Islamic terrorist group Hamas claimed a landslide victory in the previous elections in 2006 and seemed to be on track to do so again. However, it rejects Israel’s right to live and is classified as a terrorist group. Protests in Jerusalem and elsewhere are largely devoid of leaders.

“The choice is to negotiate with Hamas or an extremely unrepresentative and defunct governing — kind of governing — authority with almost no legitimacy,” Tahani Mustafa, a researcher at the Crisis Group, an international think tank, said.

Israel and the United States seem to be following the second path, with officials in both countries stating that they intend to reinforce the PA at the detriment of Hamas, a strategy that has been tried and failed several times since Hamas took power in Gaza from Abbas’ forces in 2007.

Many Palestinians now see the PA as part of an ingrained and deeply intolerable regime of Israeli dominance that stretches well beyond the occupied West Bank, where the PA administers large population centres under Israeli influence.

Their rage erupted last month with demonstrations and clashes in Jerusalem that spread throughout the city, attracting Palestinian Israeli residents and sparking the Gaza conflict.

It was on full display during Friday prayers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the volatile holy site at the centre of the recent protests, as thousands of Palestinian worshippers chanted “Dogs of the authority, get out!” in response to a sermon delivered by a PA-appointed mufti.

This was in stark contrast to the raucous rallies organised in support of Hamas and Mohammed Deif, the mysterious leader of the group’s armed wing, at Al-Aqsa and elsewhere.

Unlike the Palestinian Authority, which made harsh statements condemning Israel’s policing of Al-Aqsa and Jewish settlers’ efforts to expel thousands of families from a local neighbourhood, Deif issued an ultimatum. When time ran out, Hamas launched long-range missiles, disrupting an Israeli parade commemorating the group’s claims to the capital.

This sparked a disastrous Gaza war, killing over 250 civilians, the vast majority of whom were Palestinians, and wreaking havoc on the devastated region.

However, it also allowed Hamas to present itself as a cunning guardian of Jerusalem, to which all sides in the Middle East conflict have strong emotional relations, and to claim victory over the much more powerful Israel.

According to Mkhaimar Abusada, a political science professor at Al-Azhar University in Gaza, support for Hamas has grown despite widespread dissatisfaction with the PA.

“At the end of the day,” he added, “Israel is the one that demolished these buildings.” “We endure as a result of Israeli colonisation, as a result of Israeli tyranny… The Palestinians will not hold Hamas responsible.”

Hanan Ashrawi, a former senior Palestinian official and veteran of the peace process who defected from the Palestinian leadership last year, blamed Israel in part for the PA’s demise, claiming that Israel “sabotaged” efforts at a two-state solution, including by widening settlements.

“The more this occurred, the more (Palestinian leaders) became seen to be powerless in the face of Israeli violations,” she added. “Israel has acted with complete impunity to make it more difficult for Palestinians.”

Israel claims that it has made several plans for a Palestinian state in the majority of the West Bank, Gaza, and east Jerusalem — areas it won in the 1967 war — that have been refused over the years. The Palestinians, negotiating from a point of vulnerability, said that the concessions were insufficient.

According to Khalil Shikaki, a renowned pollster who has been surveying Palestinian public opinion for more than two decades, Hamas’ support usually increases during times of conflict before returning to normal when things calm down. However, he claims that the Palestinian Authority’s credibility problem is legitimate.

“The most recent war between Israel and Hamas has shown that the emperor is completely naked,” he added.

Shikaki claims that Hamas was able to prove that it protected Jerusalem because no one else — not Abbas, Arab nations, nor the international community — was willing to do so.

“In terms of success, this storey is simply brilliant, and Hamas got away with it because Abbas has zero prestige among Palestinians,” he said.

That won’t stop Abbas from inviting Blinken to the presidential palace in Ramallah this week as the Palestinian king, despite the fact that he governs less than 40% of the West Bank and his presidential mandate expired more than a decade ago. His forces have no foothold in Gaza and are unlikely to return anytime soon now that the elections have been cancelled.

As a result, it is largely anticipated that any reconstruction funds will be channelled into the United Nations and Qatar. As one of the most substantive Israeli-Palestinian agreements signed in recent memory, they were already sending assistance to Gaza and carrying out humanitarian initiatives there.

google news
Continue Reading

News

India virus death toll passes 300,000, 3rd highest in world

Published

on

deaths

More than 300,000 people died in India on Monday as a result of the coronavirus, though a crippling surge in infections seemed to be easing in major cities but was swamping the poorer countryside.

The achievement was announced by India’s Health Ministry at a time when slowed vaccine supplies have hampered the country’s battle against the pandemic, causing many people to miss their vaccines, and an unusual yet deadly fungal infection involving COVID-19 patients has doctors concerned.

The death toll in India is the third-highest recorded in the world, behind the United States and Brazil, accounting for 8.6 percent of the nearly 34.7 million coronavirus deaths worldwide, though the real figure is believed to be even higher.

The Health Ministry announced 4,454 new deaths in the previous 24 hours on Monday, taking India’s total fatalities to 303,720. It also recorded 222,315 new infections, bringing the total number of infections to nearly 27 million since the pandemic started. Both are almost definitely inaccurate.

The pandemic has swamped India’s underfunded health care infrastructure after rapidly spreading through the region, from isolated Himalayan villages in the north to the vast tropical central plains and sandy beaches in the south.

Residents of the capital, New Delhi, also died at home without oxygen after hospitals ran out of supplies. COVID-19 people have died in crowded hospital halls in Mumbai. Fever and shortness of breath killed people in rural villages before they could be screened for coronavirus.

Though the megacities have shown signs of progress in recent days, the epidemic is far from over in India. It seems to have already taken a heinous toll in the country’s large rural areas, where the bulk of the population lives and health care is scarce.

Hundreds of bodies have washed up on the shores of the Ganges River in Uttar Pradesh in recent weeks. Even others have been discovered hidden in small graves along the river’s sandy shores. Concerns have been raised that they are the bones of COVID-19 victims.

India’s vaccination push has also recently stalled, with several states claiming they don’t have enough vaccinations to go around.

Just 41.6 million people, or 3.8 percent of the world’s nearly 1.4 billion people, have been completely vaccinated in the world’s largest vaccine-producing nation. To “minimise vaccine waste,” the federal government allowed walk-in registration at government-run vaccination centres for those aged 18 to 44 on Monday.

The first recorded COVID-19 death in India occurred on March 12, 2020, in the southern state of Karnataka. It took seven months to meet the first 100,000 people who had died. In late April, the official death toll surpassed 200,000. After new illnesses ripped through dense cities and rural areas alike, and devastated health-care services on the verge of failure, the next 100,000 deaths were reported in just 27 days.

Average regular deaths and cases have declined marginally in recent weeks, and the government announced on Sunday that it is running the most COVID-19 testing in history, with more than 2.1 million samples checked in the previous 24 hours.

google news
Continue Reading

HEALTH

COVID testing’s value shrinks as vaccines beat back virus

Published

on

covid

The fresh, more relaxed mask guidelines from federal health authorities have almost completely overshadowed another big shift in government guidance: fully vaccinated Americans will largely avoid being screened for the coronavirus.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced last week that certain patients who have undergone the full course of vaccines who have no COVID-19 signs do not need to be tested for the infection, even though they have been exposed to someone who is sick.

The move marks a new step in the disease after nearly a year in which research was the main tool against the virus. Vaccines are also integral to the solution and have significantly reduced hospitalizations and fatalities.

According to experts, the CDC recommendation represents a recent fact in which almost half of Americans have undergone at least one vaccination and almost 40% are completely vaccinated.

“At this point, we also should be questioning whether the benefits of research outweigh the costs — which are a lot of delays, a lot of doubt, and very little clinical or public health benefit,” said Dr. David Paltiel of Yale’s School of Public Health, who advocated for universal testing at colleges last year.

Although vaccinated individuals will still contract the virus, they are less likely to become seriously sick as a result of it. Positive test results, on the other hand, may cause needless worry and disruptions at work, home, and education, such as quarantines and shutdowns, according to many experts.

Other health experts believe the CDC’s sudden updates on the need for masks and monitoring have sent the message that COVID-19 is no longer a significant concern, despite the fact that the United States publishes regular case counts of about 30,000.

“The average Joe Public is interpreting what the CDC is doing as ‘This is over. It’s done,'” said Harvard University’s Dr. Michael Mina, a leading proponent of widespread, accelerated research.

With more than 60% of Americans not completely vaccinated, he believes screening of those without symptoms has a role to play, especially among front-line employees who interact with the public.

The revised recommendations, according to CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, are focused on findings that demonstrate the vaccine’s robust efficacy in reducing illness in a variety of age ranges and settings. And when individuals who have been vaccinated contract COVID-19, their infections are milder, shorter, and less likely to spread to others.

As a result, the CDC states that vaccinated individuals will normally be removed from mandatory COVID-19 occupational screening.

This move could alleviate research headaches like the one recorded recently by the New York Yankees, in which one player and several staffers tested positive on a particularly responsive COVID-19 test despite having been vaccinated.

Baseball administrators are debating whether to discontinue or limit monitoring of players who have no signs.

However, widespread efforts to waive tests for vaccinated individuals can run into the same problem as the CDC’s latest mask guidelines: there’s no straightforward way to tell who has been vaccinated and who hasn’t.

Employers have the legislative authority to prescribe vaccinations for the majority of their employees, but few have used this authority because the vaccines do not yet have full regulatory clearance. Some employment-law experts consider requiring workers to report their vaccine record to be invasive.

For the time being, research seems to be ongoing unabated in areas where it has been implemented, ranging from workplaces to meatpacking plants to sports teams.

Smithfield Foods, a pork manufacturer, said it continues to perform a mix of obligatory and discretionary tests for workers, based on worksite conditions. Amazon has stated that it will continue to provide standard, voluntary research.

The NBA has stated that it intends to keep its testing scheme in place for the time being. The league has been lauded for using robust testing to build COVID-19-free “bubbles” surrounding players, coaches, and personnel.

On a national scale, the availability of COVID-19 tests currently well outnumbers the market. Officials in the United States collect estimates of over 1 million tests every day, down from a high of over 2 million in mid-January, but many rapid tests performed at home and at work go uncounted.

Consumers can purchase 15-minute over-the-counter samples at pharmacies and other retail locations. This is in addition to expanded capacity from labs and hospitals in the United States, which ramped up research following last year’s crushing demand.

According to Arizona State University researchers, the United States will be able to perform 500 million monthly experiments by June.

And as early as this winter, numerous health professionals were pushing for a massive research campaign to reopen classrooms, offices, and other industries in a healthier manner. But this was before it was understood how safe the vaccine would be in use, how easily it could be administered, and whether it would defend against variants.

“The vaccines outperformed expectations,” said Dr. Jeffrey Engel of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. “At this stage, you should start peeling back some of the other layers of mitigation, such as mask usage and screening.”

In the previous pandemic relief package, Congress set aside $46 billion to increase testing, especially in schools. However, since all Americans aged 12 and over are now registered for vaccinations, many middle and high school children will be completely vaccinated when they return to school in the fall.

Furthermore, several school districts have now opposed routine tests for elementary schools, citing the fact that children rarely become chronically sick and that a positive test can result in destructive quarantines.

Some states have also returned government research dollars, opting for less intrusive interventions such as mask wearing and social distancing.

According to Engel, many school administrators “only see screening services as a massive obstacle that isn’t going to help.”

google news
Continue Reading

News

Henry Cavill To Star in Lionsgate’s ‘Highlander’ Reboot From Chad Stahelski

Published

on

Henry

In the world of Highlander films, there can only be one, and Henry Cavill is vying for the title. According to Deadline, the Man of Steel star is in negotiations for one of the lead roles in Lionsgate’s Highlander remake, which will be directed by John Wick’s Chad Stahelski. Kerry Williamson wrote the script.

Neal H. Moritz and Josh Davis are producing the project. Executive producers will be Amanda Lewis, Patrick Wachsberger, and Gregory Widen. Before his death in February, Peter Davis, the original producer of the first film, was also on board to make.

The original Highlander film, released in 1986, starred Christopher Lambert, Sean Connery, and Clancy Brown as eternal entities on the quest for more strength. The film, with its catchphrase “There can only be one,” spawned four sequels and three television shows, including the famous USA series starring Adrian Paul.

The plot of this new take is unclear, as is whether Cavill will play a completely new character or a character from previous films. The remake has been in the works for a while, with everyone from Ryan Reynolds to Justin Lin involved at some stage, but according to insiders, these new developments have placed the film in a position to go into production.

After starring in big tentpoles like Man of Steel and Mission: Impossible – Fallout, Cavill now has another franchise with a huge fanbase. He is currently shooting the second season of Netflix’s The Witcher after its record-breaking first season. He is also expected to reprise his appearance as Sherlock Holmes in the sequel to Netflix’s Enola Holmes, which will star Millie Bobby Brown.

google news
Continue Reading

News

BTS’ ‘Butter’ Breaks YouTube Record for 24-Hour Views

Published

on

Butter

Who else but BTS could break a BTS record?

With their latest English-language single “Butter,” the Korean supergroup shattered their own record for most YouTube views in the first 24-hours of release on Friday, reaching nearly 113 million views by midnight ET, according to the platform’s public views tracker.

The previous record was set by BTS’s 2020 single “Dynamite,” their first entirely in English. According to official YouTube figures, the video received 101.1 million views in the first 24 hours, despite having 98.3 million public views.

The summer dance-pop jam “Butter” by BTS was launched on YouTube on Thursday, May 21, at 12AM ET/1PM KST, and has been pushed to new heights by the group’s devoted followers, ARMY.

With over 3.9 million combined viewers, the album set a new all-time record for the largest YouTube music video premiere and debuted at No. 1 on the U.S. iTunes chart within two hours of its release.

The video had been viewed over 116 million times by 1 a.m. ET Saturday.

BTS has previously set several 24-hour views milestones, such as for “Boy With Luv” featuring Halsey in April 2019, which received 74.6 million views on the first day.

The band announced at a press conference in Seoul on Friday that their first performance of “Butter” will be at the upcoming Billboard Music Awards on Sunday, May 23. They were nominated for four awards this year, the most in a single year, in the following categories: Top Duo/Group, Top Social Artist (for the fifth year in a row), Top Song Sales Artist, and Top Selling Song (for “Dynamite”).

Speaking of the upcoming broadcast, Suga acknowledged on Friday that “the first appearance of a song still makes you nervous.”

“Of course, the Billboard Awards are a very relevant, interesting, and meaningful stage for us,” he said.

Jungkook stated that the event would be significant for the band.

“Of course, the fact that we were nominated in four categories is not straightforward. It’s a tremendous honour,” he added. “It’s been a year since ‘Dynamite,’ and I think this reveals that the album is really loved by a lot of people, which makes us really happy.”

google news
Continue Reading

News

Biden plans to meet with George Floyd’s family on the anniversary of his death

Published

on

Biden Wants to Expand Abortion Pill Sales to Kill Millions of Babies, Jeopardize Women’s Health

On Tuesday, the one-year anniversary of George Floyd’s assassination, President Biden prepares to host Floyd’s family at the White House.

Floyd, 46, died when a police officer in Minneapolis kneeled on his neck for more than nine minutes during a detention.

His death on May 25, 2020, sparked months of demonstrations across the United States against perceived police brutality and racism.

Jen Psaki, White House press secretary, said Friday that Biden would observe the day but did not elaborate.

The president had earlier set the date as the deadline for enactment of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, a police oversight bill that had passed through the House but had failed in the Senate after passing through the House in March.

The bill will outlaw chokeholds, eliminate eligible immunity for law enforcement in civil cases, and establish national police guidelines. Republicans are opposed to the repeal of qualified immunity.
In Minneapolis, April 20, 2021, an individual responds close Cup Foods after a guilty verdict was declared in the trial of former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd in 2020. The Associated Press reports

In Minneapolis, April 20, 2021, an individual responds close Cup Foods after a guilty verdict was declared in the trial of former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd in 2020. The Associated Press reports

Psaki on Friday acknowledged the bill was “unlikely” to proceed by Biden’s deadline but said progress continued to be made on it.

Floyd’s family also expects to hold activities for lawmakers and civil rights activists in Minneapolis on Tuesday, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

Derek Chauvin, a former Minneapolis police officer, was acquitted last month of second-degree accidental homicide, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter in Floyd’s case.

In connection with the investigation, three other retired police officers are awaiting trial.

Defendants Thomas Lane, J. Kueng, and Tou Thao are charged with second-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Ron DeSantis Hints His Political Future: ‘I Have Just Begun To Fight’

Published

on

American Conservative Union Holds Annual Conference In Florida

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) hinted Thursday that he has a lot more expected for his political future.

DeSantis addressed some 750 Republican activists and officials at the Republican Committee of Allegheny County’s annual Lincoln Day Dinner. DeSantis was the event’s main attraction, boasting of his success and concluding his speech with a suggestion about his future ambitions.

“I will assure you this: As governor of Florida, I have just started to fight,” DeSantis said to applause, according to CNN.

Earlier in the event, a local priest prayed over the dinner, remarking that DeSantis would be an excellent choice for the next President of the United States. The crowd loudly approved.

During his message, DeSantis emphasised his fights with businesses, as well as radical activists and legislators. The governor touted recent laws tackling big tech censorship, as well as his advocacy for law enforcement and curriculum devoid of vital race theory lessons. Reader’s Ticket

DeSantis also touted Florida’s contribution to the COVID-19 pandemic. Florida has one of the lightest pandemic reactions, focusing on protecting those most susceptible to the epidemic.

“All I would say to any state that hasn’t followed suit is, open your state, open your colleges, stop these mask mandates, and let people live and thrive,” DeSantis said, according to CNN. “When it comes down to it, we opted for independence over Fauci-ism.”

DeSantis defeated Democrat Andrew Gillum for governor of Florida by around 33,000 votes in 2018. Despite the narrow margin, DeSantis has received strong encouragement from Floridians for his pandemic response and other initiatives. According to a May poll conducted by the Florida Chamber of Commerce, DeSantis has a large base of support among registered voters, with 55% approving of his leadership and 40% disapproving.

DeSantis has been a vocal critic of the Biden administration, especially President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 decision-making and rhetoric. Earlier this month, DeSantis accused the Biden administration of being “anti-science” after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proposed a moratorium on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine due to six cases of blood clots out of 7 million vaccines.

“The truth is, saying that we need all of these limits even for widespread vaccines is an anti-science stance. Since the number of vaccinations is greater than the number of clinical trials in terms of effectiveness,” DeSantis said. “According to the CDC, over 95 million individuals have now been vaccinated. The number of patients who have been re-infected or infected since receiving a vaccine has been much less than one-tenth of one percent. This figures are just as amazing as you might wish for. So my advice is to get vaccinated and then live your life as if you’re safe. You don’t have to chafe under indefinite constraints.”

google news
Continue Reading

News

In Georgia, a judge has approved a major election audit and has ordered that absentee ballots be opened for inspection

Published

on

vote

A Georgia judge decided Friday to unseal nearly 150,000 absentee ballots in Fulton County, the state’s most populous county, so that prosecutors could look for proof of suspected voter fraud.

What are the specifics?

According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero is authorising more than 145,000 absentee ballots from the 2020 presidential election to be reviewed as part of the investigation.

The precise aspects of the audit are still being worked out, but Amero has confirmed that the ballots will remain in the hands of Fulton County election officials as the audit is carried out.

The Journal-Constitution has more:

The ruling was made in response to a complaint brought by nine claimants, including Garland Favorito, a Fulton county resident and self-styled election watchdog. It’s one of hundreds of cases stemming from the November presidential election and the January Senate runoff, some of which are now making their way through the courts.

Since the results of the 2020 presidential election in Fulton County were approved months ago, the audit cannot alter them.

The Journal-Constitution announced that “plaintiffs hope an audit of ballots will get to the bottom of what they see as irregular activities at State Farm Arena on election night and pave the way for more credible elections in the future.”

Georgia state and local authorities have said several times that there is no proof of systematic voter irregularities in the race.
What was the response?

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who has refuted Donald Trump’s allegations that Georgia’s election was marred by voter irregularities, has said he respects the judge’s ruling.

Raffensperger cited “a longstanding tradition of election mismanagement” in Fulton County in a tweet.

“From the beginning, I have urged Georgians who have genuine questions about the election in their counties to seek those concerns across legal channels,” Raffensperger said. “Fulton County has a long tradition of election mismanagement, which has understandably eroded voters’ confidence in the scheme. Allowing this audit adds another degree of accountability and public participation.”

Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts (D), on the other hand, slammed the decision.

“It is outrageous that Fulton County is now being used as a target for those who refuse to consider the outcome of last year’s election,” Pitts said.

“The ballots have been counted three times, including a hand recount,” Pitts added, “and no proof of bribery has been identified.” “The truth remains that Fulton County had an election in the middle of a public health pandemic in a clean and stable manner. It’s a shame that the ‘Big Lie’ continues on and can cost the county’s hardworking people.”

google news
Continue Reading

Trending