Skip to content

China is under renewed commercial pressure under Biden

Under President Joe Biden, the U.S.-China trade war is not going anywhere. Biden will not directly challenge Beijing because he needs to concentrate on coronavirus and the environment, economists claim. However, he looks likely to revive the strain on trade and technical complaints that in 2017 led

Biden claims 'Nothing We Can Do' to modify the 'trajectory' pandemic in the coming months
Biden claims ‘Nothing We Can Do’ to modify the ‘trajectory’ pandemic in the coming months

Under President Joe Biden, the U.S.-China trade war is not going anywhere.

Biden will not directly challenge Beijing because he needs to concentrate on coronavirus and the environment, economists claim. However, he looks likely to revive the strain on trade and technical complaints that in 2017 led President Donald Trump to raise import tariffs in China.

Negotiators could minimise Trump’s focus on limiting China’s multi-million-dollar trade surplus with the US and making it harder to open up its long-term, government-dominated economy. Yet there is no expectation of sudden tariff cuts or other significant improvements.

Louis Kuij’s of Oxford Economics said: “I think Biden is going to focus more on extracting systemic changes. “It will take a while before we receive any shift or explicit announcements.”

White House spokesperson Jen Psaki said on Monday that Biden is reviewing tariffs on Chinese exports and needs to discuss future measures with allies. She did not indicate any improvements.

“The chairman’s commitment is to stop the economic abuses of China,” said Psaki.

A spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry, Zhao Lijian, called for Washington to learn from Trump’s “erroneous policies” and to take “constructive action,” without suggesting the likelihood of Beijing reforms.

“To both sides, cooperation is the only right choice,” Zhao said on Tuesday.

Trump operated on complaints that Europe and other traders share, but the blazing battle in Washington has nothing to show. President Xi Jinping was taken to the table, but world trade raged, consumer prices soared, and jobs were wiped.

One year ago, Beiing undertook to purchase more soybeans and other exports and to avoid pressure firms from handing over technologies in the Phase I Agreement of January 2020. The most recent important change was that.

In these transactions, China falls short. It bought about 55 percent of what it promised in the wake of the coronavirus tumult. With respect to technology policy, some economists claim these improvements are necessary but wonder if they are a winner. They say that Beijing should have made it stick to its own plans anyway.

As a result of its record of commerce, territorial clashes with its rivals, persecution in Hong Kong, allegations of ethnic Muslims being persecuted, and allegation of technical robbery and espionage China is faced with more opposition than ever.

Nathan Sheets, former Secretary for Foreign Affairs of the Obama administration, said that “the storey has changed dramatically.

Biden’s decision to replace U.S. Katherine Tai. In a speech this month, trade negotiator Robert Lighthizer made an acoustic note of China.

“We’re facing a growing, ambitious China’s stiffening competition,” Tai said. “China which is managed by the central planners whose economies are not subject to democratic pluralism, elections to democracy or public opinion.

It means that China must make some improvements if progress is to be made, said Raoul Leering, ING’s world trade analyst. While several of Trump’s comments were “close to absurdity,” he said that China had more trading barriers and official interference in the economy than the USA.

“It will depend on China to see if Biden will break down trade barriers, the speed with which they reform and change policies,” he said.

After 2 1/2 years and the 13 negotiations, negotiators still have to discuss the position of politically favoured state-owned firms that control sectors, from the banking industry to the oil industry, through telecoms, as a major irritant to Chinese trading partners.

Europe, Japan and other policymakers have reproached Trump, but have repeated arguments that Beijing steals technologies and violates the promises of opening up the economy by subsidising and defending businesses from competition.

The grievances are fundamental to a state-led communist party model of growth, which the leadership of the Communist Party sees as the basis for the prosperity of China.

The “national champions” are created, including PetroChina, Asia’s largest oil maker, and China Mobile, the world’s largest subscriber telecommunications carrier. The state industry was declared the core economy by the party in 2013.

The party nurtures rivals in the areas of solar, electric car, next-generation telecoms and other industries beyond the state economy.

Beijing could give its argument to be a developed economy to drop, even if it is one of the main producers and a middle-income company it insists on. Leering said. According to WTO laws the Communist Party is allowed to defend and participate further in economic practises.

Leering said that it was “a gesture of great importance.”

The opening shot for Trump in 2017 was a tax rise on Chinese imports worth $360 billion. Beijing also replaced the agricultural states that voted for Trump in 2016, with tariff increases and frozen soja imports.

The US trade deficit with China reduced over the past year by 19 percent and over the first nine months of 2020 by 15 percent in 2019.

Trump’s goal of transferring workers to the United States was not accomplished. Importers switched to Taiwan, Mexico and other providers instead. The gross US trade deficit marginally reduced in 2019 and grew almost 14% until November last year.

In the meantime, it is projected that tariff adjustments cost about $1.300 last year to the average household in the US. Corporations have delayed expenditures, undoing half of Trump’s corporate tax reductions for 2017.

The U.S.-China Business Council and Oxford Economics have found that 245,000 tariff jobs have lost the US economy. It also said that by 2025, even a small decline would generate 145,000 jobs.

Through cutting off access to U.S. telecommunications technology for Huawei Technologies Ltd. and other firms that American officials consider as potential security threats and a danger to US technological leadership, Trump has escalated the burden. American investments in Chinese firms have been forced to sell Washington, which maintains they have ties with the military.

In its two decades-old “technology power” programme, the Communist Party promised to speed up China.

Psaki, spokeswoman at the White House, said that Biden was still looking at certain concerns, but did not show any potential improvements.

Biden needs to keep Beijing responsible to ensure that US technology continues to promote its military accumulation. Psakis claims it is responsible for “unfair and illegal practises.”

Zhao, Chinese spokesperson, urged Washington not to “politicise or arma” science or technology and to stop “fundamental accusations of China smear.”

Biden’s envoys are willing to finalise the sanctions of Trump by removing those in return for Chinese policy changes, Kuijs said. Yet he and other analysts are suggesting it is doubtful that scaling down tariffs and cuts would be a priority to enter technologies and capital markets.

“The reversal of recent hawkish trends in China policy is difficult to see in the USA,” said Sylvia Sheng of JP Morgan Asset Management in a paper.

It is doubtful that the tech curbs would be smoother, as Washington “takes China as a competing competitor,” said Tu Xinquan, Director of the WTO Studies Institute at Beijing’s International Business and Economics University.

The only short-term solution looks like cuts in tariffs, Tu said. He said that the World Trade Organization believes Biden could support getting rid of taxes incorrectly.

“He won’t lose face in that case,” Tu said.