Connect with us

News

The state of California has approved the reopening of ballparks and Disneyland.

Published

on

The state of California has approved the reopening of ballparks and Disneyland.

 

Nearly a year after coronavirus restrictions forced the closure of major entertainment venues, California has paved the way for fans to attend opening-day baseball games and return to Disneyland.

With COVID-19 infection rates, hospitalizations, and deaths plummeting and vaccination rates increasing, the state on Friday relaxed guidelines for reopening outdoor venues as a fall and winter boom appeared to be coming to an end.

Live concerts at stadiums and sports arenas will be allowed to reopen with reduced attendance on April 1 under new public health regulations. Amusement parks will also be allowed to reopen in counties that have moved from the state’s most stringent purple tier to the red tier.

Park capacity will be restricted in all situations, and COVID-19 safety regulations such as mask-wearing standards will be enforced.

Following a week of accomplishments, California increased vaccines for the poorest areas, counties reopened more businesses, and Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill allowing schools that have limited students to online learning to reopen classrooms this month.

“The data supports a clear opening. Dr. Jeffrey Klausner, clinical professor of preventive medicine at the University of Southern California, said, “When cases decrease, we want to return to work and education.” “In particular, outdoor activities have always been low-risk. It makes sense to open these sites.”

For Kenny King Jr., a resident of Pleasant Hill in the San Francisco Bay Area who became an annual Disneyland passholder a decade ago, the reopening can’t come soon enough. He usually takes his family to the Southern California park five times a year, but his most recent visit was for his birthday just over a year ago.

King, 38, of said he’s looking forward to returning with his 8-year-old daughter, who has only recently begun to enjoy rides like Big Thunder Mountain Railroad and Space Mountain, as well as his 2-year-old son, who was mesmerized by the lights and sounds when he visited last year.

“Disney trips are something we just started doing as a family,” King said. “Every now and then, we’ll sit around the house and say, ‘Man, I miss Disneyland.’”

Thousands of staff who were laid off by Disneyland, Universal Studios Hollywood, Knott’s Berry Farm, and other major attractions were also applauding. At Disneyland and its associated attractions in Orange County, alone, ten thousand people lost their jobs, not to mention the effect on nearby restaurants and hotels.

Employees are “excited to go back to work and provide Californians with a little of magic in their lives,” according to Andrea Zinder, president of the local United Food and Commercial Workers Union, which represents Disney employees.

Southern California, which is also in the purple band, is home to the majority of the big theme parks. Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties, on the other hand, were planning to reopen in the coming weeks as their COVID-19 numbers fell.

Just 16 of the 58 counties are actually in the red category, with two minor counties in the green. None have yet been assigned to the yellow category, which is the least restrictive.

The potential of theme parks in the red tier will be limited to 15%.

In the purple tier, outdoor activities will be restricted to 100 participants, but in the yellow tier, the cap will be increased to 67 percent.

The San Diego Padres, Los Angeles Angels, and Oakland Athletics have all announced that fans will be in the stands on April 1st. Both the Los Angeles Dodgers and the San Francisco Giants have announced that they will begin their seasons on the road.

In the purple category, teams and event leaders can only sell tickets regionally. Teams and promoters in the other tiers will sell tickets to everyone in California. Concessions will not be permitted in the purple tier, although concessions will be available only at the seats in the other tiers.

Richard Haick of San Pablo, California, has already purchased Oakland A’s ticket vouchers and plans to take his 10-year-old son to a game soon. His son participates in Little League baseball and is ecstatic to be able to watch games.

“It’s good to have some sense of normalcy, even in a reduced capacity,” said Haick, a 45-year-old photographer.

The accelerated reopening is linked to a new vaccination initiative for California’s most vulnerable people. It would be easier for counties to leave the state’s most restrictive tier once 2 million residents in 400 ZIP codes in the most deprived communities have received at least one vaccine dose. Counties will be able to set up even more vaccine clinics until 4 million residents in those neighborhoods have been vaccinated.

All of this puts California in a much better situation than it was a year ago, when Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a statewide stay-at-home order that limited travel, closed businesses, and put millions of people out of work. California continues to have some of the strictest regulations of any territory, discouraging out-of-state tourists.

The state is banking on inoculating enough of its 40 million inhabitants to prevent widespread COVID-19 infections, in order to reopen completely.

The Department of Public Health reported that just three months after the first injection, more than 10 million doses had been administered.

Just over 3 million people, or around 10% of the population aged 16 and up, have been completely vaccinated.

There are some encouraging signs. This week, the seven-day average rate of positive test results fell to 2.2 percent, which is a new low.

Despite mounting pressure to reopen the economy, health officials said that the improvements in recommendations were gradual and calculated rather than sweeping.

Dr. Mark Ghaly, secretary of the state Health and Human Services Agency, said, “We will keep our foot on the brake, not the gas, our eyes on the lane, hands on the wheel, and navigate based on data and science.”

News

Senate votes final congressional OK for $40B Ukraine aid

Published

on

Senate votes final congressional OK for $40B Ukraine aid

By ALAN FRAM

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate overwhelmingly approved a $40 billion infusion of military and economic aid for Ukraine and its allies on Thursday as both parties rallied behind America’s latest, and quite possibly not last, financial salvo against Russia’s invasion.

The 86-11 vote gave final congressional approval to the package, three weeks after President Joe Biden requested a smaller $33 billion version and after a lone Republican opponent delayed Senate passage for a week. Every Democrat and all but 11 Republicans — many of them supporters of former President Donald Trump’s isolationist agenda — backed the measure.

Biden’s quick signature was certain as Russia’s attack, which has mauled Ukraine’s forces and cities, slogs into a fourth month with no obvious end ahead. That means more casualties and destruction in Ukraine, which has relied heavily on U.S. and Western assistance for its survival, especially advanced arms, with requests for more aid potentially looming.

“Help is on the way, really significant help. Help that could make sure that the Ukrainians are victorious,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., underscoring a goal by Ukraine and its allies that seemed nearly unthinkable when Russia launched its brutal assault three months ago.

The vote was a glaring exception to the partisan divisions that have hindered work on other issues under Biden and that promise to become only less bridgeable as November’s elections for control of Congress draw closer. That includes Republicans blocking Democrats from including billions to combat the relentless pandemic in the measure, leaving their efforts to battle COVID-19 in limbo.

Last week the House approved the Ukraine bill 368-57, with all of those opposed Republicans. Though support in both chambers was unmistakably bipartisan, the GOP defections were noteworthy after Trump, still a potent force in the party, complained that such sums should first be targeted at domestic problems.

Schumer called it “beyond troubling” that Republicans were opposing the Ukraine assistance. “It appears more and more that MAGA Republicans are on the same soft-on-Putin playbook that we saw used by former President Trump,” said Schumer, using the Make America Great Again acronym Democrats have been using to cast those Republicans as extremists.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., a strong backer of the measure, addressed concerns by his GOP colleagues. He said Ukraine’s defeat would jeopardize America’s European trading partners, increase U.S. security costs there and embolden autocrats in China and elsewhere to grab territory in their regions.

“The most expensive and painful thing America could possibly do in the long run would be to stop investing in sovereignty, stability and deterrence before it’s too late,” McConnell said.

On Wednesday, Schumer said he was not confident this would be the final measure to help Ukraine. “They’re doing the fighting, they’re the ones getting killed, they’re the ones struggling and suffering. The least we can do is give them the weaponry they need,” he said.

The legislation contains around $24 billion for weapons, equipment and military financing for Ukraine, restoring Pentagon stocks of arms sent to the region and paying for U.S. reinforcements sent there. The rest includes economic aid to keep Zelenskyy’s government functioning, food programs for countries that rely on Ukraine’s diminished crop production, refugee assistance and funds for Kyiv to investigate Russian war crimes.

Congress approved an initial $13.6 billion measure in March. The combined price tag of nearly $54 billion exceeds what the U.S. spent on all its foreign and military aid in 2019, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who’s long had non-interventionist views, used procedural tactics last week to thwart Schumer and McConnell from moving the measure through the Senate then, citing Ukraine’s urgent need for the assistance.

In a personal criticism seen seldom on the Senate floor, Schumer on Wednesday called Paul’s move “repugnant” and said the delay, with passage inevitable, would “strengthen Putin’s hand.” McConnell, who last Saturday met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a surprise visit to Kyiv, did not speak up in his fellow Kentucky Republican’s defense.

In a brief interview, Paul responded that it would be “repugnant” to disparage “the democratic process” as embodied in Senate rules that he was using.

That spending concerned some Trump-friendly Republicans in Congress on Wednesday.

“It’s, you know, the world’s going to end if you don’t do anything here,” Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind., who said he would oppose the Ukraine measure. “I’m more worried about the trust fund going broke” that finances Medicare and another that pays for Social Security.

Braun said he’s long pushed for bills that pay for themselves. Asked why saving $40 billion in this instance outweighed stopping Russia, he said, “Number one, it’s going to pass.”

Another conservative, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said that as costly as the measure is, the aid will protect U.S. national security and said, “If Putin wins, the consequences for America and American taxpayers will be hundreds of billions of dollars.”

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, a moderate who has clashed with Trump, said in an interview that helping Ukraine defend itself ”is about as smart an investment as we could possibly make.” He added, “What does America First mean? It means that we should first be concerned about the interests of America. I totally agree.”

Continue Reading

News

Who Is Nicandro In; Who Killed Sara

Published

on

Who Is Nicandro In; Who Killed Sara

Season 2 of who killed Sara indeed left the audience in a jaw-dropping position. Who killed has been serving us a thrilling mystery from the start. All those twists and turns were unpredictable, but the biggest twist came from the name “Nicandro”. Who is Nicandro? How is he related to Sara’s death? Did he murder her? If yes, what motive did he have? The answer to these questions will bring the audience thriller and unexpected course of events in the show.

A Little About The Show

Who killed Sara is a Mexican thriller murder mystery. Jose Ignacio Valenzuela creates the show. The story revolves around the character Alex who is an ex-convict. He was convicted 10 years ago for the murder of her sister, Sara. Alex didn’t have the motive to kill her sister, so after getting out of jail, he is dead set on uncovering the truth of her sister’s murders.

During divulging the truth, a lot of unforeseeable twists happen. When Alex finds his sister’s diary, he breaks from solving the mystery and goes to her doctor to know more about Sara, and an even more unpredictable gospel comes to be known.

1652982009 297 Who Is Nicandro In Who Killed Sara

Who Is Nicandro?

Nicandro came into limelight in the season 2. He is Sarah’s childhood acquaintance and Lazcano’s friend. His character is portrayed as a bold, tough and arrogant person involved in drug dealing. Nicandro’s name has been already mentioned in Season 1 when Alex finds his death certificate. It came as a shock in season 2 to see him alive. How is he back from death? Seems like he was never dead.

Did Nicandro Has A Reason To Kill Sara?

Sara saw Nicandro selling drugs, and she needed money to help her father escape. So, she asked Nicandro to let her join the deal. She forced Nicandro to pay here in advance, and later she refused to pay the money. Also. Sara secretly infiltrated his motorcycle’s brake, and the proof of the same was also seen later. So, Nicandro doubtlessly had a motive to kill her.

Moreover, he is one of the people to know Sara’s dark side. He knew how vulnerable Sara was. The suspicion of Nicandro grows when he is seen holding the knife used to sever Sara’s parachute strings.

In addition to all that, he seems to be involved in the medusa project that took Sarah’s life. He was talking to the doctor not to let anyone know about this. Besides this, there might be a discovery that there are more subjects than Sara because her file was found in a cabinet full of similar files.

Who Portrayed The Role Of Nicandro?

Martin Saracho played Nicandro. He is an actor and a director known for Love spells(2021) and dark desire(2020). He is a well-known theatre artist.

What To Expect From Season 3

Who killed Sara is a show that keeps you on the edge of your seat. The original language of Who killed Sara is Spanish. Initially, the show was a television program, and later it was released on Ott. Till now, two seasons have been released on Netflix. Netflix has announced to air the third and the final season this month (May 2022).

The post Who Is Nicandro In; Who Killed Sara appeared first on Gizmo Story.

Continue Reading

News

Celtics to be shorthanded again as Derrick White out for Game 2 vs. Heat; Smart hoping to play, Horford questionable

Published

on

Celtics to be shorthanded again as Derrick White out for Game 2 vs. Heat; Smart hoping to play, Horford questionable

The Eastern Conference finals equation changed yet again for the Boston Celtics, with the team reporting the guard Derrick White would miss Thursday night’s Game 2 at FTX Arena against the Miami Heat for the birth of a child.

White had started the Celtics’ series-opening loss on Tuesday night in place of Marcus Smart, who was sidelined by a mid-foot sprain.

White is expected back for Saturday night’s Game 3 of the best-of-seven series at TD Garden.

“It came sooner than expected,” Celtics coach Ime Udoka said of White’s plans, “but we support our guys always in that situation.”

The Celtics acquired White at midseason from the San Antonio Spurs in exchange for former Heat guard Josh Richardson.

Smart was back working with the Celtics ahead of Thursday night’s game.

The latest twist with White comes with Celtics big man Al Horford in NBA health-and-safety protocols, and with Heat guard Kyle Lowry sidelined for a second consecutive week with a hamstring strain.

Horford was awaiting test results Thursday, upgraded Thursday to questionable.

“He was not feeling ill,” Udoka said Thursday of Horford. “He’s feeling fine. He’s OK. It’s something that was unexpected. Just the protocols and testing he hasn’t passed, and we’ll go from there.”

Udoka had been away from the team on Wednesday due to a non-COVID illness. He said Thursday he is “good now.”

Of Smart’s participation in Boston’s morning shootaround, Celtics forward Grant Williams said, “He looked good. Smart’s competitive as heck, so I always expect him, no matter if he’s hurt or injured, he’ll try to make an attempt.”

()

Continue Reading

Trending