Connect with us

News

Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022

Published

on

Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022
Sponsored by Petly
Observer Content Studio is a unit of Observer’s branded content department. Observer’s editorial staff is not involved in the creation of this content. Observer and/or sponsor may collect a portion of sales if you purchase products through these links.

With so many CBD brands on the market, it can be overwhelming to find the right product for your pet. We all want the very best for our pets, which adds to the stress of making the right choice. While there are many different options when it comes to brands, it is important to remember that not all CBD is created equally. Differences in the quality of hemp, manufacturing process, and so on could all affect the results that your pet sees from taking CBD. 

When shopping for a CBD brand for your pet, you want to purchase an all-around high quality product to make sure that your pet reaps all of the amazing benefits that quality CBD has to offer. And there are a lot… 

CBD is great at many things and offers a wide variety of health benefits. Research shows that CBD can help dogs and cats with many conditions including arthritis, seizures, pain, anxiety, inflammation, and allergies. A 2018 study published in the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science found that CBD improved comfort and activity levels in dogs with osteoarthritis, which is an incredibly common condition among dogs and cats of all ages. This is just one of the many studies that indicate how CBD could benefit so many pets.

To help you make the best decision for your furry family member, we’ve compiled a list of the top brands in the US that offer CBD for Pets

Top 3 CBD For Pets – Summary

  1. Petly CBD#1 Pet CBD Brand in the US
  2. Verma Farms – 1st Runner-up
  3. Paw CBD by CBDmd – 2nd Runner-Up

Best CBD for Pets: What’s Factored Into Our Decision?

While we looked at a multitude of factors when compiling this list, here are some of the major things that influenced our decision: 

Quality Ingredients

Quality is very important when it comes to what goes into (or does not go into) CBD. We looked at the quality of the hemp that is used to make these brand’s CBD oils as well as what additional ingredients are included in their products. Safety was our top priority to ensure that your pet doesn’t get exposed to any harmful ingredients. 

Third-Party Lab Testing

Third-party lab testing was a major factor in our ranking process as it ensures that the product actually contains what the brand claims it does. When choosing a CBD product for your pet, you want to check the company’s website for their Certificates of Analysis from a third-party lab. In addition to making sure that their claims are true, third-party lab testing checks for ingredients that could harm your pet.

Product Potency & Variety

Not all pets will need the same amount of CBD, which is why product variety was an important factor in our decision. 

Customer Reviews

Customer reviews provide valuable insight into not only the product but also the company and their purchasing experience. We factored these into our decision as we only wanted to include brands on our list that have plenty of verified and satisfied customers.

Best CBD Oil for Pets – Our Top Choices

Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022

1. Petly CBD – #1 Pet CBD Brand in US

Pros:

  • Made using 100% organically grown hemp
  • Top Quality Broad-spectrum CBD
  • Certificates of analysis
  • Human grade, vegan, non-GMO and gluten free
  • Free of unnecessary additives and preservatives
  • 30 day money back guarantee
  • Top Notch customer service

Cons:

  • Only one CBD oil potency for cats

Petly CBD sets the highest standard for CBD in the pet industry. Their products are made using 100% organically grown hemp, are broad-spectrum, and are free of unnecessary additives and preservatives which can be harmful to your furry family member. Petly was founded with safety and efficacy at the forefront of their mission, so you can trust that they have not cut any corners in their manufacturing process. 

In addition to having excellent products, Petly also believes in giving back and donates a dollar from every purchase to pets in need. 

1633873399 549 Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022

Product Summary

Petly’s CBD oils come in four different potencies. Their CBD oil for cats is packed with 125mg of CBD, while their dog tinctures are packed with either 125mg, 250mg, or 500mg of CBD. All of their products are made using premium broad-spectrum hemp and are full of additional minor cannabinoids such as CBG, CBN, and CBC. Like CBD, these other minor cannabinoids have been shown to have a wide variety of health benefits. 

Petly is very confident that their customers will love their products and as a result has a 30 day money back guarantee. Additionally, if your pet loves their CBD oils, you can sign up for a subscription which saves you 25% on each order.

What Customers Are Saying

Petly has hundreds of positive reviews from customers. Customers have reported that Petly’s CBD has helped their pets with a variety of conditions like anxiety and arthritis. The overwhelming majority of Petly’s reviews are 5 star reviews.

Learn more at petlycbd.com

2. Verma Farms – Runner-Up

1633873399 123 Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022

Pros:

  • Made with organic hemp 
  • Pesticide & GMO free
  • Salmon or chicken flavored
  • Naturally and ethically sourced
  • C02 extraction

Cons:

Founded with a Hawaiian approach in mind, Verma Farms is on a mission to create a better world. Because of these strong values, Verma Farms formulates all of their products with organic hemp and without pesticides or GMOs. They use only the very best ingredients and limit the number of additional ingredients to keep their products safe and healthy for your pet.

Product Summary

Verma Farms offers two different potencies and flavors for their pet CBD oils. Their CBD oils are packed with either 150mg or 300mg of CBD. Made with broad-spectrum hemp, Verma Farms’ CBD oils come in either a Salmon or Chicken flavor, which makes taking their CBD a very pleasant experience for pets. 

What Customers Are Saying

Verma Farms’ customer reviews section is flooded with positive reviews. Overall, customers seem satisfied with the products and company. 

Learn more at vermafarms.com

3. Paw CBD – Very Potent Products

1633873399 863 Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022

Pros:

  • Free 2-3 day shipping on orders over $59.99
  • Affordable pricing
  • High potency products
  • Veterinarian formulated
  • Oils come in natural, peanut butter, or catnip flavors
  • Certificates of Analysis 
  • 60 day 100% satisfaction guarantee

Cons:

Originally founded as a brand for humans, cbdMD now also offers an impressive product range for pets. Made using USA grown broad-spectrum hemp, cbdMD offers some of the highest potency products on the market at a very affordable price. Their products are created using flash chromatography, which is a fairly unique ethanol-based extraction method. 

cbdMD prioritizes safety and adheres to good manufacturing practices (GMP) which are certified by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Their products are then third-party tested by ISO (International Organization for Standardization) certified labs.

Product Summary

cbdMD has a fantastic CBD oil product line with many different potencies and flavors. For cats, cbdMD offers two different oils that contain 150mg and 300mg of CBD. Their cat oils come in either a natural or catnip flavoring. For dogs, cbdMD offers five different potencies: 150mg, 300mg, 750mg, 1500mg, and 3000mg. Like their cat oils, cbdMDs dog oils can either be purchased with a natural flavor or peanut butter flavor. 

All of cbdMD’s oils are broad-spectrum, which contains additional minor cannabinoids that could boost your pet’s health.

What Customers Are Saying

cbdMD mostly has five star reviews from verified customers. Overall, customer reviews note positive experiences with the products, brand, and customer experience. 

Learn more at cbdmd.com

How Can My Pet Benefit From CBD?

CBD could provide your pet with many health benefits. CBD research has shown that CBD could help treat a variety of conditions including seizures, arthritis, anxiety, allergies, pain, and inflammation. These studies have also shown that CBD can promote a healthy heart, skin and coat health, and as well as many other health benefits.

Is CBD Oil Safe For Pets?

Yes, CBD oil is safe for dogs and cats. Because it doesn’t really have side effects like with some prescription medications, it can be a great safe alternative to modern medicine for some pets. 

As with all of your pet’s products, you want to make sure to shop from a reputable brand that doesn’t include harmful ingredients in their formulas. Third-party lab tests are essential to ensure that you are purchasing safe CBD products. 

You can always consult your veterinarian if you have any concerns about CBD and the effect it will have on your pet’s health.

What Is The Right Dosage For My Pet?

The right dosage varies by brand and the size of your pet. Each brand should give you some guidelines about how much CBD is right for your pet. We recommend starting out slow with a lower dosage and then working your way up to a higher dosage. It may take some time to see the effects of CBD, so don’t be discouraged if you don’t immediately notice any changes after increasing your pet’s dose.

Can My Pet Get High Or Overdose On CBD?

Your pet cannot get high or overdose on CBD, which makes CBD a fantastic natural product to try out if you have some health concerns about your pet. CBD is made from the hemp plant, which legally is required to contain less than 0.03% THC. Regardless of whether you choose a CBD isolate, broad-spectrum CBD, or full-spectrum CBD product, your pet will not get high from CBD.

If your pet ingests more than the dosage they should for your size, they may experience some slight side effects such as diarrhea, lethargy, or disorientation, but it does not pose a health risk for them and side effects should subside within a few hours. 

Can My Pet Take CBD If They Are On Any Medications? 

CBD can interact with the effects of other medications. If your pet is taking any medications, we would recommend checking in with your veterinarian prior to giving them the CBD to make sure that it won’t affect those medications. 

Conclusion

We understand that making decisions about your pet’s health can be challenging, and hope that this article has made your decision a bit easier. We feel confident recommending Petly CBD, cbdMD, and Verma Farms because of the truly great quality products that they offer. Our priority is always safety and efficacy, and we feel that these brands

Best CBD Oil for Pets—Top Pet CBD Brands for 2022

google news

News

Instant contributors: Broncos’ 2021 draft class stepping into big roles as rookies

Published

on

Instant contributors: Broncos’ 2021 draft class stepping into big roles as rookies

Entering Sunday night’s game at Kansas City, the Broncos’ 2021 draft class has combined to play 1,921 offensive/defensive snaps. A look at each player:

Pat Surtain II

Round (pick): First (ninth).

Position: Cornerback.

Games/Starts: 11/10.

Defensive snaps: 612.

About Surtain: Tied for team lead in pass break-ups (11), second in interceptions (three) and fourth in tackles (37). … At least one pass break-up in 10 of 11 games. … Entered starting lineup in Week 2 when Ronald Darby (hamstring) was injured. … Named AFC Defensive Player of the Week after two fourth-quarter interceptions (one returned for a touchdown) in last week’s win over the Los Angeles Chargers.

Javonte Williams

Round (pick): Second (35th).

Position: Running back.

Games/starts: 11/0.

Offensive snaps: 332.

About Williams: Second on team in rushing attempts (117), yards (568) and touchdowns (two). … Ranks 19th in NFL in rushing yards and 25th in carries. … Thirteen explosive rushes (gain of at least 12 yards), including carries of 20 (two), 30 (two), 31 and 49 yards. … One 100-yard game (111 in win at Dallas).

Quinn Meinerz

Round (pick): Third (98th).

Position: Right guard.

Games/starts: 9/3.

Offensive snaps: 247.

About Meinerz: Started last two games at right guard since Graham Glasgow’s season-ending broken leg, getting booked for one pass-rush disruption and two “bad” run plays. … From Division III to NFL is a big leap and Meinerz has answered challenge, showing power and athleticism.

Baron Browning

Round (pick): Third (105th).

Position: Inside linebacker.

Games/starts: 9/4.

Defensive snaps: 221.

About Browning: Limited by leg injury in training camp, used early part of regular season to play catch-up (four snaps in first seven games). … All 22 of his tackles have been in the last four games.

Caden Sterns

Round (pick): Fifth (152nd).

Position: Safety.

Games/starts: 11/1.

Defensive snaps: 194.

About Sterns: Thirteen tackles, two interceptions and two sacks. … Played primarily dime (sixth defensive back) role, but started for injured Kareem Jackson against Chargers (one pass break-up). … Interceptions against Jets and Cowboys, two sacks against Baltimore.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Suspect’s parents charged in Michigan school shooting

Published

on

Suspect’s parents charged in Michigan school shooting

PONTIAC, Mich. — A prosecutor in Michigan filed involuntary manslaughter charges Friday against the parents of a boy who is accused of killing four students at Oxford High School, after saying earlier that their actions went “far beyond negligence.”

Jennifer and James Crumbley were charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter. Under Michigan law, an involuntary manslaughter charge can be pursued if prosecutors believe someone contributed to a situation where harm or death was high. If convicted, they could face up to 15 years in prison.

“The parents were the only individuals in the position to know the access to weapons,” Oakland County prosecutor Karen McDonald said Thursday. The gun “seems to have been just freely available to that individual.”

Ethan Crumbley, 15, has been charged as an adult with two dozen crimes, including murder, attempted murder and terrorism, for the shooting Tuesday at Oxford High School in Oakland County, roughly 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of Detroit.

Four students were killed and seven more people were injured. Three were in hospitals in stable condition.

The semi-automatic gun was purchased legally by Crumbley’s father last week, according to investigators.

Parents in the U.S. are rarely charged in school shootings involving their children, even as most minors get guns from a parent or relative’s house, according to experts.

There’s no Michigan law that requires gun owners keep weapons locked away from children. McDonald, however, suggested there’s more to build a case on.

“All I can say at this point is those actions on mom and dad’s behalf go far beyond negligence,” she told WJR-AM. “We obviously are prosecuting the shooter to the fullest extent. … There are other individuals who should be held accountable.”

Later at a news conference, McDonald said she hoped to have an announcement “in the next 24 hours.” She had firmly signaled that Crumbley’s parents were under scrutiny when she filed charges against their son Wednesday.

Sheriff Mike Bouchard disclosed Wednesday that the parents met with school officials about their son’s classroom behavior, just a few hours before the shooting.

McDonald said information about what had troubled the school “will most likely come to light soon.”

Crumbley stayed in school Tuesday and later emerged from a bathroom with a gun, firing at students in the hallway, police said.

The superintendent for the district late Thursday posted a YouTube video where he said the teenager was called to the office before the shooting but “no discipline was warranted.”

google news
Continue Reading

News

Fact check: Did Kyle Rittenhouse really sue LeBron James for defamation?

Published

on

Fact check: Did Kyle Rittenhouse really sue LeBron James for defamation?

Kyle Rittenhouse did not sue LeBron James for defamation. Here are details about that and other untrue claims this week.

CLAIM: Federal magistrate approved Kyle Rittenhouse’s $110 Million defamation suit against LeBron James.

THE FACTS: No such ruling was made. Rittenhouse has not filed a defamation suit against the Los Angeles Lakers star or anyone else, his spokesperson told The Associated Press. After 18-year-old Rittenhouse was acquitted of homicide charges in connection with the shooting of three people at a protest in Wisconsin, posts emerged on social media suggesting that he had filed defamation suits against some high-profile celebrities, including James. However, the claims are “absolutely not true,” according to David Hancock, a spokesperson for Rittenhouse and his family. “No legal actions have been taken against any organization or person in particular,” Hancock told the AP. He added that Rittenhouse and his legal team are not currently discussing any plans to file any defamation lawsuits. The report appeared to have originated on a satire website. Similar claims saying Rittenhouse had filed defamation suits have circulated on social media in recent days. On Sunday, the AP reported on false claims saying he had filed lawsuits against CNN, along with Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar, both hosts of “The View.” Rittenhouse fatally shot two men and injured another during protests that followed the shooting of a Black man, Jacob Blake, by a white police officer, in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse, who faced charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and attempted first-degree homicide, argued he acted in self-defense. A jury acquitted him on all charges on Nov. 19.

— Associated Press writer Josh Kelety in Phoenix contributed this report.

___

Video of first lady’s book reading manipulated to add child’s comment

CLAIM: Video captures a child yelling an expletive at Jill Biden as she begins reading a story to a group of students.

THE FACTS: The video clip was manipulated to insert audio of a child yelling a disparaging comment. It emerged Monday after the first lady sat down with a group of second grade students from Maryland to host a story time at the White House as part of the annual unveiling of holiday decorations. The altered video shows a child screaming, “Shut the f— up,” just as Biden introduces the picture book she wrote. But that comes from an unrelated video that has been shared online since at least 2019. While some people commenting on the video acknowledged that it was altered, and linked to the source of the audio, others shared the falsified video as real. The inserted audio has spread online for years, and first emerged in a video that appeared to show a young child cursing during a school graduation ceremony as adults tried to quiet the situation. It is unclear where the video was taken, but it has since become a widely-shared sound effect and has been edited into other videos, often in a comedic way. In the altered Biden video, the first lady began to introduce her 2012 book, “Don’t Forget, God Bless Our Troops,” saying: “When my son was away, my granddaughter — just like you kids — really, really missed her daddy. So I wrote this book to tell other kids, ’cause there’s lots of kids who don’t know what it’s like —.” The sound of the yelling child was then inserted at that point to make it appear a student heckled Biden mid-sentence. A video of Biden’s full remarks shows she was not interrupted and finished her sentence.

— Associated Press writer Sophia Tulp in Atlanta contributed this report.

___

Ghislaine Maxwell trial audio isn’t accessible by phone line

CLAIM: Members of the public can call the phone number 844-721-7237 and enter access code 9991787 to listen to live audio of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial.

THE FACTS: The phone number is from a previous teleconference and the code is no longer active. Callers to this number who use the code will receive the message: “your access code was not recognized,” as verified through an attempt by The Associated Press. Further, there is no such telephone line to listen to the trial audio, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. As Maxwell’s trial got underway on charges she groomed underage victims to have unwanted sex with the late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, social media users circulated a number of false claims related to the trial, as well as incorrect explanations for why it is not being publicly broadcast online or on TV. Among the false claims that emerged this week was the assertion that a phone number and access code published by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in October would allow callers to listen in on the proceedings. Public telephone access to in-court criminal proceedings was previously provided in some cases “due to substantial restrictions on in-person attendance” during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a statement from the Office of the District Court Executive. The accommodation was discontinued in early November as in-person viewing was able to resume more regularly. Members of the media are not banned from the trial, either, as other social media users have falsely suggested. Reporters and members of the public are still able to watch the trial live, both in the courtroom, as well as in overflow rooms where it will be streamed for those who don’t get a seat, Judge Alison Nathan wrote in a Nov. 24 ruling. There are no other live feeds except those within the courthouse. Federal courts typically do not allow cameras like some state courts do. Maxwell has pleaded not guilty to her charges and denied wrongdoing.

— Sophia Tulp

___

Stores can’t write off customer donations made at checkout

CLAIM: When a customer elects to donate to charity at a store’s checkout counter, the store can write off that donation on its own end-of-year taxes.

THE FACTS: Stores can’t write off a customer’s point-of-sale donations, because they don’t count as company income, according to tax policy experts. Stores are only allowed to write off their own donations, such as when a store donates a certain portion of all its proceeds to charity. A widely circulating meme, shared thousands of times this week on Facebook and Instagram, claimed that retailers ask customers to add a little more for charity when checking out in order to fund their own tax write-offs. That’s misguided, according to Renu Zaretsky, a writer at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. “The only way a company can write off money is if it’s income,” Zaretsky said. “And this is not counted as income.” Rather than receiving a customer’s donation as income, the company serves as a holding agent for that money, Zaretsky said. Customers may tally up their cash register donations for their own tax returns, but stores are not allowed to claim those. However, if a company gives to a charity on its own, not through prompting a customer to give, it can write off that money, according to Garrett Watson, a senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation. Checkout charity campaigns bring in millions of dollars for charitable organizations each year, but customers should know they aren’t obligated to give when prompted, according to Zaretsky. They should also know, though, that a donation option at the cash register isn’t a sign of a money-hungry organization looking to lower its tax bill.

— Associated Press writer Ali Swenson in New York contributed the report.

____

The World Economic Forum did not write about the omicron variant in July

CLAIM: The World Economic Forum published a story about the new coronavirus variant, now named omicron, in July 2021, months before South Africa first reported it to the World Health Organization this week.

THE FACTS: The WEF first published an article about detecting variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 in July, but archived versions of the story show it did not mention omicron at that time. The article was updated in November after the WHO’s announcement, the archives show. Scientists in South Africa identified and reported the new variant, B.1.1.529, on Nov. 24, saying it was behind a recent spike in COVID-19 cases in the country. By Nov. 26, the WHO had declared it a “variant of concern” and given it the name “omicron.” The next day, Twitter users circulated posts linking to the WEF article, suggesting that it showed the variant was not new at all. “They’re starting to make mistakes. WHO just said that ‘Omicron’ was first reported by South Africa on 11/24/21. However, WEF reported this EXACT same ‘variant’—B.1.1.529, out of South Africa—way back in July. Oops,” reads one post that was retweeted over 3,000 times. But previous versions of the WEF article stored by the Wayback Machine, an internet archive, show that it did not mention the new variant until recently, although the forum failed to note that the article had been updated until later. An archive of the page from July 12, when the story was first published, contains no mention of the new variant. Another version archived on Sept. 22 shows the article unchanged. A version from Nov. 26, after omicron was announced, shows the article had then been updated to say “South African scientists have discovered a new COVID-19 variant” and that it is called “B.1.1.529.” The article, however, still did not note that it had been updated — retaining the July 12 timestamp — as the false claims began circulating on social media, an archived version shows. A note was added later in the day saying: “This article was last updated on 26 November 2021.”

— Associated Press reporter Karena Phan in Sacramento, Calif., contributed this report.

___

Photos of London Olympics don’t show prior knowledge of pandemic

CLAIM: Photos of the London Olympics opening ceremony in 2012 prove that the COVID-19 pandemic has been planned for a long time.

THE FACTS: The opening ceremony didn’t predict the COVID-19 pandemic, nor did its imagery relate in any way to the virus that would emerge and shut down the world eight years later, as a widely circulating Facebook post falsely claimed. The post shared images from the ceremony, from a scene featuring hospital beds, women in dresses and a giant, skeletal figure in a black robe with a white wand towering overhead, to falsely claim they prove the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated. “Remember the London Olympics 2012 opening ceremony, with the giant death figure holding a needle, the dancing nurses and all of the children in hospital beds?” the post read. “It’s starting to make a lot more sense now. They have had this planned for a long time.” However, the costumes and figures in the ceremony had no relationship to the COVID-19 pandemic, and predated it by years. Instead, they paid tribute to Britain’s National Health Service and to iconic British children’s literature, including the “Harry Potter” franchise and its robed villain, Voldemort. “To the strains of Mike Oldfield’s Tubular Bells, a scene of children in hospital beds was overrun by literary villains including Captain Hook, Cruella De Vil, the Queen of Hearts and Voldemort, before a group of flying nannies – reminiscent of Mary Poppins – arrived from the skies to banish the nightmarish characters,” the Olympics website explains. Patients and hospital staff from a London hospital were among the performers in the spectacle, according to local press reports.

— Ali Swenson

___

Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck

___

Follow @APFactCheck on Twitter: https://twitter.com/APFactCheck

google news
Continue Reading

Trending