Connect with us

News

125th Boston Marathon: Snapshots from a historic race

Published

on

125th Boston Marathon: Snapshots from a historic race

Boston Strong. Absolutely.

But to reach the finish line on Boylston Street, athletes in the 125th Boston Marathon first had to be Hopkinton hardened, Ashland ready, Framingham resilient, Natick tough, Wellesley sturdy, Newton indestructible and Brookline unbreakable.

Make no mistake, this was a different Boston. Unlike in 2019, when more than 30,000 athletes completed the 26.2-mile journey, about 18,000 started in Hopkinton. There were also far fewer spectators than normal.

All volunteers wore masks; a few spectators did as well. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the 2020 race was cancelled and instead of a typical April event, the marathon was pushed back to October.

Leaves fell onto the course, an odd sight for veteran runners.

But in many ways normalcy returned. Spectators cheered. Bands cranked out live music. Signs (“May the course be with you”) were everywhere. The Boston Marathon, after an absence of 30 months, was back.

It was quite a day.

9:45 a.m.

A couple of hundred yards past the Newton fire station, after the athletes took a right on Commonwealth Avenue, women’s wheelchair athlete Eva Houston struggles to take on the first of several hills which culminate with Heartbreak Hill.

Houston slowly makes her way toward the 18-mile mark. Leaves are falling on the road and spectators are yelling out support. It’s backbreaking work and Houston barely looks up.

Finally, thankfully, she crests the hill and begins a downward path. The relief on her face is unmistakable. Houston finishes 10th in her division.

10:08 a.m.

There is a buzz in the air. The elite men are coming toward the 30K (18.6 mile) mark. But there is no lead pack. Just a surprising sight: American runner CJ Albertson isn’t just in the lead. He’s alone and has about a 45-second lead. It’s a stunning development.

A pack of about 15 runners follows. In the crowd is Benson Kipruto of Kenya, who goes on to win the race in 2 hours, 9 minutes and 51 seconds. Albertson, of Fresno, Calif., finishes as the second American and 10th overall. The top U.S. finisher, seventh overall, is Colin Bennie of Princeton, Mass.

10:32 a.m.

The elite women approach 19.3 miles and a hilly stretch.

There is little drama. Diana Kipyogei holds a 70-yard lead and looks comfortable. The Kenyan will not be caught. She wins by 24 seconds, crossing in 2:24:45. Kipyokei looks over her shoulder to check on her competition, but was never threatened. She’ll return to Kenya $150,000 richer.

11:08 a.m.

With U2’s “Beautiful Day” blaring from a nearby Newton yard, Yari Fontebasso of Italy is all smiles as he reaches 20.6 miles. More importantly, he crests the infamous Heartbreak Hill.

Fontebasso will return to Italy with plenty of memories. He crosses in 2:43:54.

A new song greets runners as Fontebasso heads toward Boston College: “Runnin’ Down a Dream” by Tom Petty. Seems to be a musical trend.

11:27 a.m.

Athletes love going past Boston College. One, Heartbreak Hill is over. Two, the campus features a long downhill journey. Three, less than five miles in the race remain. Four, the BC students are plenty vocal.

Among those cheering on the runners are 18-year-old BC freshmen Hunter Linton and Nick Tukuru.

“The whole school was looking forward to it,” says Linton, of Westminster, Md. “It’s been the talk of the campus.”

Tukuru, who hails from Westchester County in New York, can’t believe how fast the lead runners flew by at the 21.5-mile mark.

“They’re in some kind of otherworldly zone,” he says. “It’s unreal.”

The clouds begin to give way to sunshine. Great for the spectators. Not so good for the runners.

Bridget Stacy looks like she’s run only a mile. She sports an ear-to-ear smile going past the BC students. The Virginia runner was probably still smiling when she finished in 2:58:59.

12:09 p.m.

Cambridge resident Tim Warren is standing at the top of Heartbreak Hill. He’s waiting to see his niece run by. Warren mentions that Kristina Gracey, a doctor who lives in Rutland, Mass., is six months pregnant.

“It’s an amazing accomplishment,” Warren said. “She’s very focused.”

And very elusive. Warren scans runner after runner. No sign of his niece. He checks his app — she’s already run by. Gracey’s pregnancy doesn’t slow her. She averages less than eight minutes per mile and crosses in 3:28:39.

2:29 p.m.

The sun has broken out, temperatures have risen above 72, and the back-of-the-pack runners are struggling. Nearly every runner approaching the bridge over Route 95/128 is walking. There are 10 miles to go. Boylston Street in Boston seems a universe away.

3:31 p.m.

He is showered, feels human again, and Scott Graham is inside a hotel room paid for by the Greater Lowell Road Runners.

Hours before, at mile 20.2, after dumping a cup of water over his head at a water stop, he’s asked by a friend how he feels.

“Terrible,” the 62-year-old Westford resident said.

But now he’s in a better place. He’s extended his Boston Marathon streak to 35 years, even if his time of 4:48:18 is his slowest ever Boston.

“They could have used a calendar to time me,” he quips.

“I never started this to put together a streak. It’s just kind of grown. To get to the 35th is kind of a milestone, he says.

Graham has run three marathons around a track since the last official Boston Marathon in April 2019. Running the course again was a lot more memorable.

“It was uplifting,” he says. “The crowds get you going. Every 100 yards or so you could hear someone yell, “Go, Scotty!”

5:21 p.m.

Beth Craig is being driven back to Hopkinton. She’s trying not to think about chaperoning an eighth-grade trip to New Hampshire’s hilly Pack Monadnock on Wednesday.

Who can blame her? The 53-year-old Tyngsboro resident has just made Boston Marathon history by becoming the first person to push her mother in a wheelchair the entire 26.2 miles.

“It feels wonderful. My mom has endured so much for 40 years,” Craig says of her mother, Barbara Singleton, 77, who was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1982. “It was such a great moment for her. It’s worth every ache and pain. My mom had the best day. The crowds were amazing. It was like a parade. I can’t even describe how the crowds were like. My legs were just gassed. There were a lot of emotional moments.”

Mother and daughter completed their record-breaking journey in 7:14:46.

google news

News

Instant contributors: Broncos’ 2021 draft class stepping into big roles as rookies

Published

on

Instant contributors: Broncos’ 2021 draft class stepping into big roles as rookies

Entering Sunday night’s game at Kansas City, the Broncos’ 2021 draft class has combined to play 1,921 offensive/defensive snaps. A look at each player:

Pat Surtain II

Round (pick): First (ninth).

Position: Cornerback.

Games/Starts: 11/10.

Defensive snaps: 612.

About Surtain: Tied for team lead in pass break-ups (11), second in interceptions (three) and fourth in tackles (37). … At least one pass break-up in 10 of 11 games. … Entered starting lineup in Week 2 when Ronald Darby (hamstring) was injured. … Named AFC Defensive Player of the Week after two fourth-quarter interceptions (one returned for a touchdown) in last week’s win over the Los Angeles Chargers.

Javonte Williams

Round (pick): Second (35th).

Position: Running back.

Games/starts: 11/0.

Offensive snaps: 332.

About Williams: Second on team in rushing attempts (117), yards (568) and touchdowns (two). … Ranks 19th in NFL in rushing yards and 25th in carries. … Thirteen explosive rushes (gain of at least 12 yards), including carries of 20 (two), 30 (two), 31 and 49 yards. … One 100-yard game (111 in win at Dallas).

Quinn Meinerz

Round (pick): Third (98th).

Position: Right guard.

Games/starts: 9/3.

Offensive snaps: 247.

About Meinerz: Started last two games at right guard since Graham Glasgow’s season-ending broken leg, getting booked for one pass-rush disruption and two “bad” run plays. … From Division III to NFL is a big leap and Meinerz has answered challenge, showing power and athleticism.

Baron Browning

Round (pick): Third (105th).

Position: Inside linebacker.

Games/starts: 9/4.

Defensive snaps: 221.

About Browning: Limited by leg injury in training camp, used early part of regular season to play catch-up (four snaps in first seven games). … All 22 of his tackles have been in the last four games.

Caden Sterns

Round (pick): Fifth (152nd).

Position: Safety.

Games/starts: 11/1.

Defensive snaps: 194.

About Sterns: Thirteen tackles, two interceptions and two sacks. … Played primarily dime (sixth defensive back) role, but started for injured Kareem Jackson against Chargers (one pass break-up). … Interceptions against Jets and Cowboys, two sacks against Baltimore.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Suspect’s parents charged in Michigan school shooting

Published

on

Suspect’s parents charged in Michigan school shooting

PONTIAC, Mich. — A prosecutor in Michigan filed involuntary manslaughter charges Friday against the parents of a boy who is accused of killing four students at Oxford High School, after saying earlier that their actions went “far beyond negligence.”

Jennifer and James Crumbley were charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter. Under Michigan law, an involuntary manslaughter charge can be pursued if prosecutors believe someone contributed to a situation where harm or death was high. If convicted, they could face up to 15 years in prison.

“The parents were the only individuals in the position to know the access to weapons,” Oakland County prosecutor Karen McDonald said Thursday. The gun “seems to have been just freely available to that individual.”

Ethan Crumbley, 15, has been charged as an adult with two dozen crimes, including murder, attempted murder and terrorism, for the shooting Tuesday at Oxford High School in Oakland County, roughly 30 miles (50 kilometers) north of Detroit.

Four students were killed and seven more people were injured. Three were in hospitals in stable condition.

The semi-automatic gun was purchased legally by Crumbley’s father last week, according to investigators.

Parents in the U.S. are rarely charged in school shootings involving their children, even as most minors get guns from a parent or relative’s house, according to experts.

There’s no Michigan law that requires gun owners keep weapons locked away from children. McDonald, however, suggested there’s more to build a case on.

“All I can say at this point is those actions on mom and dad’s behalf go far beyond negligence,” she told WJR-AM. “We obviously are prosecuting the shooter to the fullest extent. … There are other individuals who should be held accountable.”

Later at a news conference, McDonald said she hoped to have an announcement “in the next 24 hours.” She had firmly signaled that Crumbley’s parents were under scrutiny when she filed charges against their son Wednesday.

Sheriff Mike Bouchard disclosed Wednesday that the parents met with school officials about their son’s classroom behavior, just a few hours before the shooting.

McDonald said information about what had troubled the school “will most likely come to light soon.”

Crumbley stayed in school Tuesday and later emerged from a bathroom with a gun, firing at students in the hallway, police said.

The superintendent for the district late Thursday posted a YouTube video where he said the teenager was called to the office before the shooting but “no discipline was warranted.”

google news
Continue Reading

News

Fact check: Did Kyle Rittenhouse really sue LeBron James for defamation?

Published

on

Fact check: Did Kyle Rittenhouse really sue LeBron James for defamation?

Kyle Rittenhouse did not sue LeBron James for defamation. Here are details about that and other untrue claims this week.

CLAIM: Federal magistrate approved Kyle Rittenhouse’s $110 Million defamation suit against LeBron James.

THE FACTS: No such ruling was made. Rittenhouse has not filed a defamation suit against the Los Angeles Lakers star or anyone else, his spokesperson told The Associated Press. After 18-year-old Rittenhouse was acquitted of homicide charges in connection with the shooting of three people at a protest in Wisconsin, posts emerged on social media suggesting that he had filed defamation suits against some high-profile celebrities, including James. However, the claims are “absolutely not true,” according to David Hancock, a spokesperson for Rittenhouse and his family. “No legal actions have been taken against any organization or person in particular,” Hancock told the AP. He added that Rittenhouse and his legal team are not currently discussing any plans to file any defamation lawsuits. The report appeared to have originated on a satire website. Similar claims saying Rittenhouse had filed defamation suits have circulated on social media in recent days. On Sunday, the AP reported on false claims saying he had filed lawsuits against CNN, along with Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar, both hosts of “The View.” Rittenhouse fatally shot two men and injured another during protests that followed the shooting of a Black man, Jacob Blake, by a white police officer, in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse, who faced charges, including first-degree intentional homicide and attempted first-degree homicide, argued he acted in self-defense. A jury acquitted him on all charges on Nov. 19.

— Associated Press writer Josh Kelety in Phoenix contributed this report.

___

Video of first lady’s book reading manipulated to add child’s comment

CLAIM: Video captures a child yelling an expletive at Jill Biden as she begins reading a story to a group of students.

THE FACTS: The video clip was manipulated to insert audio of a child yelling a disparaging comment. It emerged Monday after the first lady sat down with a group of second grade students from Maryland to host a story time at the White House as part of the annual unveiling of holiday decorations. The altered video shows a child screaming, “Shut the f— up,” just as Biden introduces the picture book she wrote. But that comes from an unrelated video that has been shared online since at least 2019. While some people commenting on the video acknowledged that it was altered, and linked to the source of the audio, others shared the falsified video as real. The inserted audio has spread online for years, and first emerged in a video that appeared to show a young child cursing during a school graduation ceremony as adults tried to quiet the situation. It is unclear where the video was taken, but it has since become a widely-shared sound effect and has been edited into other videos, often in a comedic way. In the altered Biden video, the first lady began to introduce her 2012 book, “Don’t Forget, God Bless Our Troops,” saying: “When my son was away, my granddaughter — just like you kids — really, really missed her daddy. So I wrote this book to tell other kids, ’cause there’s lots of kids who don’t know what it’s like —.” The sound of the yelling child was then inserted at that point to make it appear a student heckled Biden mid-sentence. A video of Biden’s full remarks shows she was not interrupted and finished her sentence.

— Associated Press writer Sophia Tulp in Atlanta contributed this report.

___

Ghislaine Maxwell trial audio isn’t accessible by phone line

CLAIM: Members of the public can call the phone number 844-721-7237 and enter access code 9991787 to listen to live audio of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial.

THE FACTS: The phone number is from a previous teleconference and the code is no longer active. Callers to this number who use the code will receive the message: “your access code was not recognized,” as verified through an attempt by The Associated Press. Further, there is no such telephone line to listen to the trial audio, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. As Maxwell’s trial got underway on charges she groomed underage victims to have unwanted sex with the late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, social media users circulated a number of false claims related to the trial, as well as incorrect explanations for why it is not being publicly broadcast online or on TV. Among the false claims that emerged this week was the assertion that a phone number and access code published by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in October would allow callers to listen in on the proceedings. Public telephone access to in-court criminal proceedings was previously provided in some cases “due to substantial restrictions on in-person attendance” during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a statement from the Office of the District Court Executive. The accommodation was discontinued in early November as in-person viewing was able to resume more regularly. Members of the media are not banned from the trial, either, as other social media users have falsely suggested. Reporters and members of the public are still able to watch the trial live, both in the courtroom, as well as in overflow rooms where it will be streamed for those who don’t get a seat, Judge Alison Nathan wrote in a Nov. 24 ruling. There are no other live feeds except those within the courthouse. Federal courts typically do not allow cameras like some state courts do. Maxwell has pleaded not guilty to her charges and denied wrongdoing.

— Sophia Tulp

___

Stores can’t write off customer donations made at checkout

CLAIM: When a customer elects to donate to charity at a store’s checkout counter, the store can write off that donation on its own end-of-year taxes.

THE FACTS: Stores can’t write off a customer’s point-of-sale donations, because they don’t count as company income, according to tax policy experts. Stores are only allowed to write off their own donations, such as when a store donates a certain portion of all its proceeds to charity. A widely circulating meme, shared thousands of times this week on Facebook and Instagram, claimed that retailers ask customers to add a little more for charity when checking out in order to fund their own tax write-offs. That’s misguided, according to Renu Zaretsky, a writer at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. “The only way a company can write off money is if it’s income,” Zaretsky said. “And this is not counted as income.” Rather than receiving a customer’s donation as income, the company serves as a holding agent for that money, Zaretsky said. Customers may tally up their cash register donations for their own tax returns, but stores are not allowed to claim those. However, if a company gives to a charity on its own, not through prompting a customer to give, it can write off that money, according to Garrett Watson, a senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation. Checkout charity campaigns bring in millions of dollars for charitable organizations each year, but customers should know they aren’t obligated to give when prompted, according to Zaretsky. They should also know, though, that a donation option at the cash register isn’t a sign of a money-hungry organization looking to lower its tax bill.

— Associated Press writer Ali Swenson in New York contributed the report.

____

The World Economic Forum did not write about the omicron variant in July

CLAIM: The World Economic Forum published a story about the new coronavirus variant, now named omicron, in July 2021, months before South Africa first reported it to the World Health Organization this week.

THE FACTS: The WEF first published an article about detecting variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 in July, but archived versions of the story show it did not mention omicron at that time. The article was updated in November after the WHO’s announcement, the archives show. Scientists in South Africa identified and reported the new variant, B.1.1.529, on Nov. 24, saying it was behind a recent spike in COVID-19 cases in the country. By Nov. 26, the WHO had declared it a “variant of concern” and given it the name “omicron.” The next day, Twitter users circulated posts linking to the WEF article, suggesting that it showed the variant was not new at all. “They’re starting to make mistakes. WHO just said that ‘Omicron’ was first reported by South Africa on 11/24/21. However, WEF reported this EXACT same ‘variant’—B.1.1.529, out of South Africa—way back in July. Oops,” reads one post that was retweeted over 3,000 times. But previous versions of the WEF article stored by the Wayback Machine, an internet archive, show that it did not mention the new variant until recently, although the forum failed to note that the article had been updated until later. An archive of the page from July 12, when the story was first published, contains no mention of the new variant. Another version archived on Sept. 22 shows the article unchanged. A version from Nov. 26, after omicron was announced, shows the article had then been updated to say “South African scientists have discovered a new COVID-19 variant” and that it is called “B.1.1.529.” The article, however, still did not note that it had been updated — retaining the July 12 timestamp — as the false claims began circulating on social media, an archived version shows. A note was added later in the day saying: “This article was last updated on 26 November 2021.”

— Associated Press reporter Karena Phan in Sacramento, Calif., contributed this report.

___

Photos of London Olympics don’t show prior knowledge of pandemic

CLAIM: Photos of the London Olympics opening ceremony in 2012 prove that the COVID-19 pandemic has been planned for a long time.

THE FACTS: The opening ceremony didn’t predict the COVID-19 pandemic, nor did its imagery relate in any way to the virus that would emerge and shut down the world eight years later, as a widely circulating Facebook post falsely claimed. The post shared images from the ceremony, from a scene featuring hospital beds, women in dresses and a giant, skeletal figure in a black robe with a white wand towering overhead, to falsely claim they prove the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated. “Remember the London Olympics 2012 opening ceremony, with the giant death figure holding a needle, the dancing nurses and all of the children in hospital beds?” the post read. “It’s starting to make a lot more sense now. They have had this planned for a long time.” However, the costumes and figures in the ceremony had no relationship to the COVID-19 pandemic, and predated it by years. Instead, they paid tribute to Britain’s National Health Service and to iconic British children’s literature, including the “Harry Potter” franchise and its robed villain, Voldemort. “To the strains of Mike Oldfield’s Tubular Bells, a scene of children in hospital beds was overrun by literary villains including Captain Hook, Cruella De Vil, the Queen of Hearts and Voldemort, before a group of flying nannies – reminiscent of Mary Poppins – arrived from the skies to banish the nightmarish characters,” the Olympics website explains. Patients and hospital staff from a London hospital were among the performers in the spectacle, according to local press reports.

— Ali Swenson

___

Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck

___

Follow @APFactCheck on Twitter: https://twitter.com/APFactCheck

google news
Continue Reading

Trending