Connect with us


Saints’ seven runs enough to put away Buffalo

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Saints’ Seven Runs Enough To Put Away Buffalo

Eliot Soto went 4 for 5 with three RBIs, and Aaron Sanchez worked in and out of trouble for five innings as the Saints beat the Buffalo Blue Jays, 7-4, on Saturday at Sahlen Field.

Soto’s two-run single in the fourth inning gave St. Paul a 2-0 lead. He scored on Spencer Steer’s one-out single for a 5-3 lead, and his two-out single gave the Saints a 7-3 lead in the ninth.

The Saints have led every game in this six-game series in the eighth inning or later yet take a 2-3 record into Sunday’s series finale, a 12:05 p.m. first pitch.

Michael Helman went 3 for 5 with a pair of solo home runs, and John Andreoli added a solo homer as the Saints beat the first-place team in the International League East Division.

Sanchez (2-0) allowed five hits and five walks in five innings but limited the Blue Jays to three runs. He struck out three. JC Ramirez pitched a scoreless inning, walking two, for his second hold.

Juan Minaya pitched the ninth, giving up a leadoff homer to Samad Taylor, and putting two more on base before retiring Chavez Young on a liner to center to close out the Saints’ second win of the series.

Thomas Hatch (4-4) took the loss, charged with four earned runs on eight hits and a pair of walks. He struck out five.



Florida judge to hold hearing Tuesday on request to unseal Mar-A-Lago affidavit – Tampa Bay Now

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Florida Judge To Hold Hearing Tuesday On Request To Unseal Mar-A-Lago Affidavit - Tampa Bay Now

PALM BEACH, Fla. (CW44 News At 10 | CNN) – The federal magistrate judge who approved the Mar-a-Lago search warrant will hold a hearing Thursday in Florida court to discuss requests to unseale the affidavit of cause probable investigators, who the Department of Justice opposed his release.

A federal judge on Friday unsealed the search warrant and property receipt from the FBI’s search of former President Donald Trump’s resort in Palm Beach, Florida, a decision backed by the Justice Department, but On Monday, the DOJ said it opposed the release of the affidavit specifically in an effort to protect witnesses and keep grand jury proceedings confidential.

READ MORE: President Joe Biden signs the Inflation Reduction Act

“Disclosure of the government affidavit at this stage would also likely impede future cooperation of witnesses whose assistance may be sought as this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations,” wrote the Department of Justice. “The fact that this investigation involves highly classified documents further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is released to the public prematurely or inappropriately.”

Media organizations, including CNN, had demanded that the affidavit be unsealed after the search last week at Trump’s Palm Beach, Fla., club and residence.

Thursday’s hearing announcement came hours before two people briefed on the matter told CNN that the FBI interviewed former White House attorney Pat Cipollone and his former deputy Patrick Philbin earlier this year. as part of the investigation into federal records brought to Trump’s home in Palm Beach. .

The two are the most senior Trump officials questioned in what is now a criminal investigation into possible mishandling of classified information and obstruction. The couple are among a group of former Trump aides the FBI interviewed after the criminal investigation began this spring, those briefed on the matter said.

The DOJ gave details in the affidavit that lay out the argument investigators made to Federal Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart explaining probable cause that he had to search Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last week. The search, documents say, was an evidence-gathering step in a national security investigation into presidential records at Mar-a-Lago. Trump owns the sprawling estate, and it is his primary residence as well as a members-only club and resort.

The FBI recovered 11 sets of classified documents during its search, including some documents marked as “top secret/SCI” – one of the highest classification levels, according to search warrant documents released on Friday .

The FBI returned three passports to Trump’s lawyers after they were inadvertently seized during the search last week. The FBI said Monday night in response to questions about passports that it follows established procedures authorized by the courts and returns items not needed for law enforcement purposes.

READ MORE: A 10-year-old boy had part of his leg amputated after a shark attack

The statement came after comments from Trump on his social media platform that the FBI had “stolen” three of his passports during the search of his Mar-a-Lago property.

Trump’s social media post came hours after the Justice Department informed its attorneys that an FBI team had seized the passports and they were being returned, according to an email posted to social media. by a Trump spokesperson.

“In executing search warrants, the FBI follows court-ordered search and seizure procedures and then releases items that do not need to be retained for law enforcement purposes” , the FBI said in a statement.

During an appearance on Fox Monday night, Trump’s attorney, Lindsey Halligan, just said investigators have already returned the passports. “They gave them to his lawyers today, so he’ll have them soon,” Halligan told Fox’s Sean Hannity.

The DOJ screening team – which works to sort confidential attorney-client communications and other highly personal information from evidence during an investigation – had collected two expired passports and Trump’s active diplomatic passport during research, according to an email from Trump spokesman Jay Budowich. public on Monday evening. Trump’s legal team had received this email from the lead prosecutor in the investigation.

The communication makes it clear that the seizure of the passport was a standard part of the search which was resolved quickly, and not a punitive action taken by the Department of Justice.

This story was updated with additional developments on Tuesday.

NO MORE NEWS: CDC: Florida leads nation in Eutylone overdose deaths

The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2022 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia company. All rights reserved.


Continue Reading


New York’s notorious Rikers Island prison sees corrections captain stabbed in the neck by suspected gang gunman

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



New York'S Notorious Rikers Island Prison Sees Corrections Captain Stabbed In The Neck By Suspected Gang Gunman

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An accused gangbanger imprisoned at Rikers Island for fatally shooting an innocent bystander allegedly stabbed a corrections captain in the neck in the infamous New York dungeon.

In a melee that erupted around 2:25 p.m. Tuesday, inmate Malik Facey is accused of stabbing a Rikers Island captain in the neck inside the George R. Vierno Center, the NY Daily News reported. , citing the New York City Department of Correction.

The captain was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital in Queens in stable condition, while corrections “continue the re-arrest” of Facey.

“This was a heinous assault on a captain who was just doing his job,” New York Corrections Commissioner Louis Molina said in a statement. “Violence against staff is never tolerated.”


A general view shows the Rikers Island facility on June 6, 2022.
(ED JONES/AFP via Getty Images)

Facey is being held at the prison complex in connection with the July 13, 2019 murder of James Weeks, 25, who was shot in the face by a stray bullet on Manhattan’s Lower East Side, according to the newspaper.

In this neighborhood, rival Up the Hill and Down the Hill gangs have engaged in an ongoing violent war exasperated in May by the robbery of 23-year-old nail salon owner Nikki Huang.

Huang complained to her friends in the Up the Hill gang about being whipped with a gun and being robbed of her expensive Louis Vuitton bag.

In retaliation, the buddies allegedly murdered 21-year-old Brandon Atkinson, whose brother is believed to be a superior in the Down the Hill gang. Another shooting erupted about an hour later, injuring a 22-year-old Down the Hill member and a 19-year-old bystander.

Criminal Justice Activists Demand That The Rikers Island Prison And The System They Claim Discriminate Against The Poor By Demanding Bail Before The End Of The Trial, February 28, 2022, At The Gate Of Rikers Island In Queens, New York .

Criminal justice activists demand that the Rikers Island prison and the system they claim discriminate against the poor by demanding bail before the end of the trial, February 28, 2022, at the gate of Rikers Island in Queens, New York .
(Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

Members of the Furious Down the Hill gang then allegedly kidnapped Huang and his former college basketball player friend Jesse Parrilla, 22, whose bodies were found burned beyond recognition inside the Honda Accord charred from Parrilla’s mother near a golf course in the Bronx.

The first arrest in this dispute came on August 9, when 18-year-old Zymir Humphrey was extradited from West Virginia to New York to face murder and weapons possession charges in Atkinson’s death. .


The NYPD is still looking for Jahmel Sanders, 30, and Steven Santiago, 34, both wanted for questioning in connection with the gruesome killings of Huang and Parrilla.


Continue Reading


Dodge plans to retire Challenger as parent company Stellantis eyes electrified future

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Dodge Plans To Retire Challenger As Parent Company Stellantis Eyes Electrified Future

LOS ANGELES– For more than a dozen years, the Challenger has been Dodge’s modern muscle car, delivering old-school power and retro-inspired looks.

But the Challenger is heading into retirement, as the brand embarks on an electrified future.

They promise an electric muscle car to replace it as part of an overall corporate plan; join other major automakers in this promise.

Dodge is one of many brands inherited in the United States from the former Chrysler Corporation, now under the umbrella of Stellantis, a global company focused on a greener future.

Dodge, Chrysler, Ram, Jeep, Fiat and Alfa Romeo will begin an electric transition in the coming years.

The global head of Stellantis did not hesitate to do so.

“The customer is always at the heart of Stellantis and our commitment with this investment plan of more than 30 billion (euros) is to offer iconic vehicles that have the performance, the capabilities, the style, the comfort and the electric range that fit perfectly into their daily lives,” said CEO Carlos Tavares.

We’re already seeing it in the popular Jeep brand, with two plug-in hybrid models hitting showrooms now, and an all-electric compact Jeep coming soon.

Alfa Romeo is the company’s most premium car brand in North America, not counting Ferrari. This new small SUV called Tonale will see the light of day next year, offered as a plug-in hybrid.

Future models could be fully battery powered.

On the truck side, Ram has announced that there will be an electric-only pickup in two years, following rivals Detroit Ford and GM.

Chrysler was actually the first of the “heritage” brands to start using electric power, with the Pacifica Hybrid minivan.

It won’t be the last.

Here’s a look at what’s coming from the Chrysler brand in the electric future – it’s a concept car called Airflow. A modern EV, with a name borrowed from Chrysler’s distant past.

Some welcome these changes with open arms, but others are not so sure. If you’re in the latter group and like your old-school rides, well, as the saying goes, better buy one while you can!

Copyright © 2022 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.


fbq(‘set’, ‘autoConfig’, false, ‘443456229787972’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘443456229787972’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);


Continue Reading


Syria denies holding missing American journalist

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Syria Denies Holding Missing American Journalist

Syria has denied holding US journalist Austin Tice, saying on Wednesday it had not abducted “any US citizen from its territories”.

The statement from the Syrian Foreign Ministry comes a week after US President Joe Biden said the United States knew “for certain that he was being held by the Syrian government”.

Biden said in a statement on the 10th anniversary of Tice’s disappearance that the United States had repeatedly requested the Syrian government’s assistance in bringing Tice home, and that he had called on Syria “to put an end to this”.

Tice disappeared in August 2012 at a checkpoint west of the Syrian capital, Damascus. A video released in September of the same year showed a blindfolded Tice being held by gunmen.

Tice’s family continually sought help to secure his return.

His disappearance came in the early years of the Syrian conflict which included US aid to some groups opposed to President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, as well as US military operations against Islamic State militants who seized control of Syria. parts of Syria.

Syria has opposed what it calls US violations of its sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the statement from the Syrian Foreign Ministry said on Wednesday that any communication with the US side will be based on respect for the non-interference in Syrian affairs.

Some information for this report comes from The Associated Press.

USA voanews

Continue Reading


Kiss of death: Tennessee woman is charged with MURDER after ‘slipping meth into an inmate’ during prison visit

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Kiss Of Death: Tennessee Woman Is Charged With Murder After 'Slipping Meth Into An Inmate' During Prison Visit

Kiss of death: Tennessee woman is charged with MURDER after ‘slipping inmate half an ounce of meth during jail visit’ – only for him to later die of an overdose

  • Rachel Dollard, 33, passed half an ounce of methamphetamine to inmate Joshua Brown
  • The couple were seen kissing during the visit and exchanged drugs orally
  • Brown died shortly afterwards at a local hospital of a massive overdose.
  • Dollard faces charges of second degree murder and drug trafficking

A woman has been charged with murder following a fatal kiss while visiting a man in prison who died a short time later.

Rachel Dollard, 33, was visiting inmate Joshua Brown, who was serving an 11-year sentence on drug-related charges, at the Turney Center Industrial Complex prison in Only, Tennessee, last February.

During the visit, the pair were seen kissing, during which Dollard passed Brown a balloon lozenge containing half an ounce of methamphetamine, which he then swallowed, according to the Tennessee Department of Correction.

Brown died a short time later at a local hospital, the bag thought to have split open in his stomach and flooded his system with a massive and lethal dose of methamphetamine. His sentence was due to expire in 2029.

Rachal Dollard was arrested over the weekend by TDOC special agents and the Dickson County Sheriff’s Department on a warrant from a sealed indictment in Hickman County.

She was charged with second degree murder in Brown’s death and smuggling into a correctional facility.

Rachel Dollard, 33, Has Been Charged With Second Degree Murder Following The Death Of Joshua Brown

Rachel Dollard, 33, has been charged with second degree murder following the death of Joshua Brown

Joshua Brown Was Serving An 11-Year Prison Sentence For Drug-Related Crimes When He Swallowed A Half Ounce Of Methamphetamine That Dollard Smuggled Into The Prison While Kissing Him During A Visit, Only For Him To The Bag Breaks In His Stomach

Joshua Brown Was Serving An 11-Year Prison Sentence For Drug-Related Crimes When He Swallowed A Half Ounce Of Methamphetamine That Dollard Smuggled Into The Prison While Kissing Him During A Visit, Only For Him To The Bag Breaks In His Stomach

Joshua Brown was serving an 11-year prison sentence for drug-related crimes when he swallowed a half ounce of methamphetamine that Dollard smuggled into the prison while kissing him during a visit, only for him to the bag breaks in his stomach

Second degree murder generally involves incidents considered to have been committed with malicious intent, but which are not considered to have been premeditated.

“This incident highlights the real dangers of bringing contraband into prisons and the consequences that flow from it,” said David Imhof, director of the TDOC’s Office of Investigations and Conduct.

“Our agency will pursue prosecution of anyone who threatens the safety and security of our staff, the men and women in our care and our facilities.”

In the state of Tennessee, a second degree murderer is usually sentenced to 15 to 60 years in prison.

During The Visit, The Pair Were Seen Kissing, During Which Dollard Passed Brown A Balloon Lozenge Containing Half An Ounce Of Methamphetamine, Which He Then Swallowed, According To The Tennessee Department. Of Correction Stock Photo

During The Visit, The Pair Were Seen Kissing, During Which Dollard Passed Brown A Balloon Lozenge Containing Half An Ounce Of Methamphetamine, Which He Then Swallowed, According To The Tennessee Department. Of Correction Stock Photo

During the visit, the pair were seen kissing, during which Dollard passed Brown a balloon lozenge containing half an ounce of methamphetamine, which he then swallowed, according to the Tennessee Department. of Correction Stock Photo

The sentence for second degree murder is generally less severe than that for first degree murder, which is when a murder is considered deliberate and premeditated.

Capital punishment cannot be imposed as a sentence for a second degree murder conviction.

The Department of Corrections said in a statement that it uses a variety of tools to try to prevent contraband from entering Tennessee prisons.

These include frisk searches of anyone entering a facility, vehicle and cell searches, and drug detection dogs. Body scanners are also currently installed at all facilities, they add.

TDOC encourages anyone with information about potential security issues to call the 24-hour anonymous tip line, 1-844-TDC-FIND (1-844-832-3463).


dailymail us

Continue Reading


latest news Fetal homicide law under scrutiny after Windsor Hills accident

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Latest News Fetal Homicide Law Under Scrutiny After Windsor Hills Accident

Gutter votives, wilted sunflowers and a menagerie of immaculate stuffed creatures marked the blackened corner where Armani Lester’s life ended before he took his first breath.

Six bodies were recovered by the coroner from the August 4 crash site in Windsor Hills. Six murder charges have been filed against the driver of the Mercedes-Benz that crossed the intersection of La Brea Boulevard and Slauson Avenue. The violent collision was so violent, said Los Angeles County coroner’s spokeswoman Sarah Ardalani, that it ripped Armani from his mother’s womb.

Yet California law remains divided on how to count accident victims and what defines justice for pregnant women whose babies die before birth.

“Under state law, the unlawful killing of a fetus may be charged with murder,” a spokesperson for the Los Angeles District Attorney explained. “There is no similar provision for manslaughter.”

That’s why the driver, Nicole Lorraine Linton, 37, was charged with five counts for the crime. The registered nurse, who worked at Kaiser Permanente’s West Los Angeles Medical Center, was traveling over 90 miles per hour when she ran through a red light in Slauson and crashed into several cars.

The crash killed 23-year-old pregnant Asherey Ryan and the boy posthumously named Armani, who was just a month away from her due date. He also claimed Ryan’s 11-month-old son, Alonzo Quintero; her boyfriend, Reynold Lester; and best friends Nathesia Lewis, 43, and Lynette Noble, 38.

Linton is being held without bond at the Century Regional Detention Center.

But where does the distinction between the charges – six murders, five manslaughters – come from? And why would California, a self-proclaimed “State of Reproductive Freedom,” want to enshrine fetal murder in its homicide law?

The answer goes back to a 1970 law, written two and a half years before the Roe v. Wade decision and decades before the push for “fetal personality” by anti-abortion lawmakers. It was designed as a surrogate to protect pregnant women, who even today are twice as likely to die from violence as from hemorrhage or preeclampsia.

“There was never talk of a back door to the fetal personality,” said Michele Goodwin, a UC Irvine law professor and reproductive justice expert. “They were feminists trying to protect battered women.”

In 1969, an Amador County man stalked and brutalized his pregnant ex-wife, kicking her in the stomach so hard he left heel prints. The baby was stillborn just hours after the attack, her skull badly fractured. The man was charged with murder, but the California Supreme Court overturned the charge, ruling that common law defined a “human being” as one who was born alive.

So California lawmakers rewrote the law. Three dozen other state legislatures followed suit.

In 2004, a California jury convicted Scott Peterson of second-degree fetal murder, which earned him the death penalty. That same year, the California Supreme Court ruled that murder of the fetus could be charged even in cases where the accused did not know the victim was pregnant, such as in crashes like the one in Windsor Hills.

Yet 50 years of “fetal protection” laws have done little to curb maternal homicide, which remains the leading cause of death among pregnant women in the United States. Instead, these laws are increasingly being used to prosecute women who suffer from stillbirths.

“These laws were passed in the name of protecting pregnant women from harm – from abusers, hit-and-runs, bank robbers – but the laws ended up being used against pregnant women themselves,” said said Farah Diaz-Tello, legal director of If/Quand/Comment, an Oakland-based nonprofit.

A recent study by the National Advocates for Pregnant Women documented more than 1,700 cases nationwide between 1973 and 2020 in which women were criminalized for their conduct during pregnancy or its outcome.

“What we saw in the 80s and 90s was a perfect storm of the anti-abortion movement and just plain racism and cruelty,” Goodwin said. “Prosecutors were amplified by the war on drugs, amplified by the ‘welfare queen’ mythology – they got this idea that if women had stillbirths, they must have caused it themselves. It must have been a cigarette they were smoking; it must have been a Valium they took. We see this effort to make something look like science that isn’t.

Indeed, arrests and lawsuits for pregnancy loss have become more common in recent years.

“The abortion debate has presented this abstract idea that every pregnancy ends in a healthy baby. It’s not,” said Jill Wieber Lens, a law professor at the University of Arkansas and an expert in legal recognition and stillbirth treatment. “Twenty-four thousand stillbirths still occur each year in this country.”

Yet even in hardline anti-abortion states, prosecutions for fetal murder are relatively rare.

“I can’t name one murder prosecution for a stillborn in Arkansas, but I can name two in California,” the professor said.

Both of these cases were brought within the past five years by the same Central Valley prosecutor.

In 2018, Kings County Dist. Atti. Keith Fagundes has accused Adora Perez, then 29, of murder after she suffered a stillbirth at 37 weeks pregnant. He alleged that she had used methamphetamine, which resulted in the death of the fetus.

These allegations have never been proven and would not meet the legal standard of murder if they were, experts said. The Kings County prosecutor’s office did not return calls for comment.

At the request of his attorney, Perez did not contest manslaughter, a crime that does not exist for fetuses.

“The anti-abortion movement has invested in trying to reach out to district attorneys to advise them to prosecute in these spaces,” Goodwin said. “In the State of California, we must always be mindful: It’s not just what happens in the Legislature that impacts the lives of pregnant women; this is also what happens in prosecutors’ offices.

In 2019, Fagundes accused Chelsea Becker, 26, a mother of three, of the same crime after a stillbirth.

Becker’s case sparked national outrage and renewed scrutiny of the law.

“The purpose of the Legislature in adding the murder of a fetus to Section 187 of the Penal Code was not to punish women who do not follow – or cannot, because of dependency or resources – follow Best Practices in Prenatal Health”, California Atty. General Rob Bonta wrote in a June 2021 amicus brief on behalf of Perez. “A contrary interpretation would lead to absurd – and constitutionally questionable – results.”

In January, Bonta sent out a legal alert warning California prosecutors and law enforcement officials that “the state has no right to punish people for the outcome of their pregnancies.”

“The charges against Ms. Becker and Ms. Perez were not in accordance with the law, and this misuse of Section 187 should not be repeated,” Bonta said. “With reproductive rights under attack in this country, it’s important that we make it clear: Here in California, we do not criminalize pregnancy loss.”

In the months that followed, Perez’s conviction was overturned and charges against both women were dropped. Fagundes lost its seat in an upheaval in early June.

But Becker spent more than a year in pretrial detention and Perez languished in prison for four years. For many, Roe’s fall against Wade, which protected a woman’s constitutional right to abortion, makes the threat of such lawsuits more real and the need to prevent them more urgent.

So California lawmakers are once again rewriting the law.

Assembly Bill 2223, expected to pass this month, would revise Section 187 of the criminal code to further protect pregnant women from prosecution. It would also limit death investigations in many cases of fetal loss.

“This bill just entrenches what is already state law,” said Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks (D–Oakland), sponsor of the bill. “It ensures that pregnant women cannot be sued for loss of pregnancy, whether it be abortion, miscarriage, stillbirth or perinatal death caused by something that happened in utero.”

The bill would allow those wrongfully prosecuted under the law to sue.

“It provides an avenue of redress, which is essential,” Wicks said.

The measure would not affect cases like the Windsor Hills accident, where violence inflicted on a pregnant person results in the death of the fetus. Nor would it legalize infanticide, as critics have charged.

Still, some reproductive rights experts say California’s once groundbreaking law may have survived its use.

“These laws were passed in the name of protecting pregnant women, but we don’t have data to show that they’ve been effective,” Diaz-Tello said. “The offshoots … have been extremely harmful, but there has been no critical examination of whether they have achieved their original purpose.”

Continue Reading