Connect with us


Jake Paul ‘not dumb enough’ to take on Carl Froch’s fight challenge, taunts retired boxer after calling out YouTuber

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Former World Champion Carl Froch Has No Qualms About Smashing Jake Paul When They Fight

JAKE PAUL wasn’t “stupid enough” to accept Carl Froch’s fight challenge, the retired boxer sneered.

Froch called the YouTuber last week as he continued hitting on the American.


Former World Champion Carl Froch has no qualms about smashing Jake Paul when they fightPhoto credit: News Group Newspapers Ltd
The Youtuber Has A Professional 5-0 Record Before Taking On Hasim Rahman On August 6


The YouTuber has a professional 5-0 record before taking on Hasim Rahman on August 6Credit: EPA

However, he continued his own bet by dismissing Paul’s chances.

In response to a tweet asking if they would actually get in the ring tomorrow, Froch wrote, “He’s not that stupid!”

Froch, 45, has not fought since 2014 when he defeated George Groves at Wembley to retain the WBA and IBF super middleweight world titles.

He then hung up his gloves with a record of 33 wins and two losses from his 35 fights.

The Cobra remains critical of Paul’s transition into the sport.

The problem child, 25, meets Hasim Rahman in his sixth professional boxing match on August 6 after the showdown with Tommy Fury collapsed.

He’s hoping to extend his record to 6-0 after previously beating a YouTuber, a basketball player and two MMA fighters.

And Froch – who has been in talks of an exhibition return against Roy Jones Jr – is confident he could easily get rid of Paul if they ended up arranging a clash.


When asked if he would accept an offer from Paul, the Nottingham star told the Daily Star: “I would because I wouldn’t see it as a fight.

“I know he’s doing what he’s doing and he’s improving and he’s got people wanting to watch him box, which is great and fair to him.

“But someone like that, how to put it, if I try to play football against the top clubs, there will be no point in sitting on the bench or playing tennis against the top players.

“Jake Paul plays like he’s a professional boxer, but he’s not.

“He can’t really fight, he knows how to stand up and he knows how to throw a punch, but he’s not a professional boxer.

“To answer your question, if Jake Paul called me, then absolutely.

“I wouldn’t even train for it, I’d take him on, I’d beat him up and I’d get a good payday because it’s Jake Paul and then I’d go home happy.”

fbq(‘init’, ‘752905198150451’);
fbq(‘track’, “PageView”);

Jake Paul ‘not dumb enough’ to take on Carl Froch’s fight challenge, taunts retired boxer after calling out YouTuber



Kohl’s should focus on buyers rather than shareholders

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Kohl'S Should Focus On Buyers Rather Than Shareholders

what a year it was Kohls. A poison pill, a proxy battle and a failed sale process later, Kohl’s is now starting the real work: proving to investors that it’s still worth sticking around.

Its second quarter did not stray too far from Wall Street’s subdued expectations. Same-store sales fell 7.7% in the quarter ended July 30 from a year earlier, slightly better than expected. Net profit fell 63% to $143 million, 3.9% lower than analysts polled by Visible Alpha believed.


Continue Reading


Deshaun Watson gets 11-game suspension, fined $5 million in deal between NFL and NFLPA

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Ravens Q&Amp;A: Olb Daelin Hayes On Learning From A Frustrating Rookie Season, Reuniting With Kyle Hamilton, The Importance Of Community Service And More

Deshaun Watson will miss 11 games and be fined $5 million for violating the NFL’s personal conduct policy.

Thursday’s announcement comes after the NFL and NFLPA reached an agreement on the punishment for the Cleveland Browns quarterback.

Watson will also undergo a “professional evaluation by behavioral experts and will follow their treatment program,” the league stated in a press release.

“Deshaun has committed to doing the hard work on himself that is necessary for his return to the NFL,” Commissioner Roger Goodell stated.

Watson was initially suspended for six games for his alleged sexual assaults on massage therapists. Twenty-four women in total filed civil lawsuits against the former Houston Texans QB.

“I’m grateful that the disciplinary process has ended,” Watson said in a statement.

“I apologize once again for the pain this situation has caused. I take accountability for the decisions I made.”

Watson’s ban will reportedly begin on Aug. 30 and he will be eligible to return to action for the Browns’ Dec. 4 game against the Texans.

Developing story, check back for details.


Continue Reading


Browns QB Deshaun Watson settles for 11-game suspension – The Denver Post

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Browns Qb Deshaun Watson Settles For 11-Game Suspension – The Denver Post


BEREA, Ohio (AP) — Deshaun Watson has reached an agreement with the NFL and will serve an 11-game unpaid suspension and pay a $5 million fine rather than risk missing his first season as a quarterback for the NFL. Cleveland Browns following accusations of sexual misconduct.

Watson was accused of sexual assault and harassment by two dozen women while playing for the Houston Texans. The league had sought to ban him for at least a year for violating its personal conduct policy.

As part of the settlement, which concludes the disciplinary process, Watson will also undergo a professional evaluation by behavioral experts and follow their treatment program, the NFL said in a statement.

“I am grateful that the disciplinary process has been completed and extremely grateful for the tremendous support I have received throughout my short time with the Browns organization. I apologize once again for any pain this situation has caused. caused. I take responsibility for the decisions I have made,” Watson said in a statement released by the team. “My goal going forward is to work to become the best version of myself on and in off the pitch and to support my teammates as much as possible while I’m away from the team.”

When later asked if he thought the settlement was fair, Watson replied, “I’ll keep my opinion to myself.”

The settlement ends months of posturing between Watson’s legal team, the NFL and the NFL Players Association.

As part of the settlement, Watson could return for the Browns’ Dec. 4 game in Houston.

“As we have previously stated, Deshaun and his representatives have respected the structure of the NFL and NFLPA pending a final decision and we have respected the process,” team owners Dee and Jimmy Haslam said in a statement. a statement. “Now that a decision on discipline has been made, we understand this is a real opportunity to create meaningful change and are committed to investing in programs in Northeast Ohio that will educate our young people in awareness, understanding and, above all, prevention of sexual violence. misconduct and the many underlying causes of such behavior.

On August 1, the three-time Pro Bowler was suspended six games by Sue L. Robinson, a former federal judge jointly appointed by the league and union to act as an independent disciplinary officer.

Robinson discovered Watson, 26, violated the league’s personal conduct policy after reviewing an investigation into his actions and calling his behavior “flagrant” and “predatory”.

Believing the suspension was too light, the league appealed and referred Watson’s case to Goodell, who had handled all player disciplines in the past. The league previously requested an indefinite suspension and a hefty fine.

Goodell appointed former New Jersey Attorney General Peter C. Harvey to hear the appeal. Harvey is an attorney who was previously involved in the NFL’s decision to suspend Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott for six games during the 2017 season for domestic violence allegations.

According to the 2020 collective agreement, Harvey’s decision would have constituted “a full, final and complete resolution of the dispute.”

At owners’ meetings this month, Goodell said the league’s pursuit of a one-year ban was warranted following its investigation and Robinson’s findings.

“She strengthened the evidence,” Goodell said. “There were multiple flagrant violations, and it was predatory behavior.”

In his conclusion, Robinson cited Watson’s lack of remorse as a factor in his decision. Watson first apologized “to all the women I’ve touched” before making his Browns debut at an exhibition in Jacksonville.

Watson was accused of being sexually inappropriate with women during massage therapy sessions from March 2020 to March 2021 in Texas. In civil lawsuits filed in Texas, the women accused Watson of exposing themselves, touching them with his penis or kissing them against their will. A woman alleged that Watson forced her to perform oral sex.

Two separate grand juries in Texas declined to indict Watson, who denied any wrongdoing. He recently settled 23 of 24 lawsuits.

For now, the suspension ends months of speculation over whether Watson would play in 2022 for the Browns, who have outbid several other teams, traded three first-round picks to the Texans in March and signed the QB. for a five-year, $230 million term. Contract.

Watson’s case has sparked strong opinions while raising questions about how the league handles player discipline and its spotty record of supporting women.

The Browns think Watson could make him a Super Bowl contender. Without him, they might struggle to simply wrestle in the AFC North against defending conference champion Cincinnati along with Baltimore and Pittsburgh.

The suspension also means that Watson will be inactive for longer. One of professional football’s elite QBs, he sat out last season in Houston after asking for a trade and before the sex allegations surfaced.

In his 16-page ruling, Robinson found the league had proven Watson violated three provisions of the conduct policy: sexual assault as defined by the league, posing a real danger to the safety and well-being of others and undermining or endangering the integrity of the league.

Robinson also pointed to flaws in the league’s conduct policy, saying it was unfair “to identify conduct as prohibited only after the conduct has occurred, just as it is inherently unfair to change the penalties for a such conduct after the fact”.

Her punishment was criticized by several organisations, including the National Organization for Women, who called it “unacceptable, insulting and dangerous – but not surprising”. The NFL and the multi-billion dollar sports industry have a vested interest in enabling sexual misconduct, assault and violence.

Attorney Tony Buzbee, who represents the 24 women who sued Watson, and Ashley Solis, the first woman to go public with allegations against Watson, denounced the initial six-game suspension at a press conference in Houston in early August. .

Watson continued training as his case progressed through the league process.

All along, the Browns’ plan was to hand over their offense to veteran Jacoby Brissett, who has made 37 career starts, during Watson’s suspension. But it’s now possible that Cleveland will explore other options at quarterback.


More AP NFL: and


Continue Reading


US Open champions to receive $2.6 million, total tennis big hit compensation of $60 million

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Us Open Champions To Receive $2.6 Million, Total Tennis Big Hit Compensation Of $60 Million

NEW YORK — The US Open singles champions will receive $2.6 million this year, with total player compensation for the Grand Slam tournament surpassing $60 million for the first time.

More of that total is allocated to earlier rounds, the American Tennis Association said Thursday, following feedback from players’ boards on the men’s and women’s tour. Players will receive $80,000 just for making the main draw and $121,000 for reaching the second round.

In 2019, the last year before the coronavirus pandemic, the singles champions earned $3.9 million. A first round loser received $58,000 and a player eliminated in the second round won $100,000.

Players will win $445,000 for reaching the quarter-finals and $705,000 for being a semi-finalist. The finalist receives $1.3 million.

The doubles championship teams will earn $688,000.

The $60.1 million total exceeds last year’s total of $57.5 million, which was already more than the other three Grand Slams paid out this year. The total prize money for the US Open qualifying tournament has now reached $6.26 million, with a final round prize of $44,000.

The main draw begins August 29 at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.


Continue Reading


As political tensions rise, Pakistan launches crackdown on media

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



As Political Tensions Rise, Pakistan Launches Crackdown On Media


ISLAMABAD — The power struggle between the Pakistani government and its ousted prime minister, Imran Khan, has escalated dramatically, with authorities targeting the pro-Khan press and officials blaming India, Pakistan’s arch-rival, to be among those supporting his comeback campaign.

A senior Khan official, arrested and jailed for making anti-military remarks on a TV talk show two weeks ago, was transferred to hospital on Wednesday after his lawyers said he had been tortured in custody . The popular cable channel where he spoke, ARY News, was forced off the air and two of its news anchors fled the country. Other journalists say they have been harassed and threatened.

The crackdown came at a controversial and uncertain time for the country and its leaders. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who took office in April, has made little progress in addressing the severe economic crisis that has sent consumer prices soaring. Khan, on the other hand, has gained momentum in local elections and continues to lead large, noisy rallies where he castigates the government.

The armed forces, which have pledged to stay out of political disputes, are caught in the crossfire. The current army chief – widely regarded as Pakistan’s most powerful person – is due to retire in three months, and the replacement process has sparked a whirlwind of rumors and criticism. The army’s image has also come under attack, particularly among Khan’s supporters on social media.

Some have made sarcastic comments online about the fatal crash of a military helicopter on August 1 while delivering humanitarian aid to a flood-ravaged region. The messages provoked a rare emotional response from military officials, who said they disgraced the victims and caused “anguish and distress” to their families.

Khan’s aide Shahbaz Gill’s comments on ARY, the most openly pro-Khan TV channel, struck a chord. In an indirect challenge to military discipline, he urged Pakistanis to follow their conscience rather than orders. “When you get an order, you have to know your values ​​and you have to be on the safe side,” he said. “You are not a madman or an animal.”

The government’s response was quick. The Home Office stripped ARY of its security clearance and the Electronic Media Regulatory Authority revoked its operating license, accusing the station of “false, hateful and seditious content”. Authorities then cut off its broadcast signal, silencing one of Pakistan’s most popular news channels. A senior government official, Planning Minister Ehsan Iqbal, said Khan was “conspiring to divide” the Pakistani military.

Gill was held for days, until a judge ordered that he be transferred to a hospital for medical reasons. Eventually he was carried on a stretcher after a dramatic three-hour standoff outside the prison gates between two police departments who both claimed jurisdiction. His lawyer, Salman Safdar, said he was tortured “in his private parts” while in police custody, a claim denied by Pakistan’s defense minister.

An ARY senior vice president was arrested at his home and charged with sedition, as were several other staff members. One of the two presenters who fled the country, Sabir Shakir, tweeted that he left “not under duress but to save the institution I love and my colleagues from harm”.

Pakistani and international media condemned the treatment of Gill and ARY. The Dawn newspaper, an influential English-language daily, warned that the crackdown “could set a dangerous precedent” and said that by overreacting the government had “given ammunition” to Khan and his party.

“Let’s not be fooled,” said Daniel Bastard, Asia-Pacific director of Reporters Without Borders. Although the Sharif government should be held accountable, he said, “it is the military who operate behind the scenes to bring Pakistani journalists into line… The credibility of the rule of law is at stake.

Repression intensified as Khan’s political strength grew. Although he was once seen as close to the military establishment, analysts say the former cricket star is now seen by the armed forces as an unreliable populist, while Sharif and his government are seen as members more cooperative from the Pakistani establishment.

“The battle lines have been drawn and the press is stuck in between,” said veteran columnist and former liberal lawmaker Ayaz Amir. He was also intimidated for making outspoken public comments; in July he said he was pulled from his car and beaten by unknown assailants after giving a speech in Lahore.

“There is no consistent policy against the media, but sensitivities have grown,” Amir said. “The taboo now is Imran Khan. If you mention it or praise it, you are suspicious.

On Saturday, Sharif and Khan held contrasting events to celebrate Pakistan’s Independence Day. Sharif addressed the nation on television, wearing a stark green suit and tie, and urged Khan to join him in finding a path to economic recovery.

Khan led a raucous late-night rally in a crowded hockey stadium, where he touted a new path to ‘true freedom’ and denounced a ‘plot’ by the Sharif government to force him out of politics by accusing him of of illegally collecting funds from foreign sources, including India.

In a tweet on Sunday, Khan warned the nation of “an unprecedented campaign of repression by the imported government and state apparatus” against journalists and media outlets aligned with his party. “If we allow these terrorist tactics to succeed, we will return to the dark days of dictatorship,” he said.

Government Defense Minister Khawaja Asif denounced the “negative” social media campaign against the armed forces as a “joint project” and a “smear campaign” by Khan’s party and the Indian government against the Pakistani army.

Asif said 18 social media accounts supporting Khan had been found in India and the former prime minister was working to ‘safeguard and advance’ the interests of India, which has fought three wars with Pakistan and remains its main enemy.


Continue Reading


Zelensky says he feared “chaos” would take hold of Ukraine before the Russian offensive – RT in French

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna



Zelensky Says He Feared “Chaos” Would Take Hold Of Ukraine Before The Russian Offensive – Rt In French

“We would have been nothing more than a wreck, not a country”: almost six months after the launch of the Russian military operation in Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky explains why he knowingly avoided preparing the Ukrainian population for this eventuality.

In an interview published on August 16 by the washington postUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reconsidered his communication choices at the time of the escalation of tensions which preceded the Russian military offensive in Ukraine.

In particular, he assured that he had voluntarily refrained from “preparing people” for the imminence of a frontal military conflict with Russia, explaining that he then had evidence to this effect, communicated by the United States. . First to avoid a flight of capital, and more generally, to save his country from a chaotic situation before the Russian military operation begins. “If we had communicated this […]I would have lost seven billion dollars a month since last October, and when the Russians attacked, they would have taken us in three days. […] If we [avions] wreaked havoc on the population before the invasion, the Russians [auraient] devoured. Because during the chaos, people flee the country”, explained the Ukrainian leader according to whom the fact of not having contributed to sow panic in the population participated in the defense of the country. Otherwise, “at the time of the invasion, we would have been nothing more than a wreck, not a country”, he explains to the washington postadding: “But we did not fall into this trap”.

As a reminder, until Vladimir Putin’s official announcement of a military operation on the night of February 23 to 24, Moscow had repeatedly denied any plans in this direction. During his speech, the Russian President finally justified the intervention of his army by considering that it had become necessary to come to the aid of the Russian-speaking populations of Donbass against the Ukrainian army, and also by emphasizing the need according to him to “denazify Ukraine”.

The fear of a “political war inside the country”

During this interview, Volodymyr Zelensky was thus pleased to have ensured that a large part of his population remained on the spot at the time of the launch of the Russian operation in Ukraine. Otherwise, he believes that there would have been “a political war within the country”: “Our government would not exist, that’s 100% sure.” Forget us,” he said again.

Moreover, the Ukrainian president detailed with the famous American daily his vision of Russian strategy in the period which preceded the frontal military conflict between the two countries. Thus, he described “a hybrid war” before the Russian offensive began: “There was an energy coup, there was a political coup, [les Russes] wanted a change of power from within the country”, he said, before also mentioning “a financial blow” which he also attributed to Russia.

Russian-Ukrainian tensions are indeed not recent, the two parties having in recent years accused each other of destabilizing actions on many occasions, particularly in the context of the Donbass war which, since 2014, caused more than 10,000 deaths, all parties combined: on the one hand the Ukrainian army, and on the other, those of the people’s republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, both with a Russian-speaking majority. Faced with this conflict, which has been going on for eight years, Moscow has repeatedly accused kyiv of not respecting the Minsk agreements which were notably supposed to guarantee the Donbass regions a special status within Ukraine.

Between Moscow and kyiv, the situation has become more and more problematic in view of the will repeatedly displayed by the Ukrainian President to have his country join NATO. A scenario through which Volodymyr Zelensky intended to benefit from security guarantees for his country, while Moscow has always opposed it, denouncing a policy of enlargement of the Atlantic Alliance towards its borders, seeing it as a betrayal of promises made to the USSR at the end of the Cold War.

RT All Fr Trans

Continue Reading