Connect with us

News

Jets can’t hold off Lamar Jackson and Ravens, fall 24-9 in season opener

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Jets Can’t Hold Off Lamar Jackson And Ravens, Fall 24-9 In Season Opener
google news

The Jets have not won a season opener since 2018.

Gang Green hoped to change that Sunday afternoon against Lamar Jackson and a tough Baltimore Ravens team.

While they kept it close for a bit, the Jets could not contain Jackson and the Ravens passing attack.

Baltimore rolled past the Jets 24-9 at MetLife Stadium.

Jackson went 17-for-30 for 213 yards with three touchdowns and an interception. Ravens receiver Devin Duvernay caught four passes for 54 yards and two touchdowns. Tight end Mark Andrews also recorded five catches for 52 yards.

On the other side, the Jets couldn’t get another going offensively with Joe Flacco under center. He completed 37 of 59 passes for 307 yards, a touchdown and an interception. It also didn’t help matters offensively that the Jets were 2-for-14 on third down conversions.

“Offensively, we moved the ball well,” second-year Jets head coach Saleh said. “Five trips into their territory. We missed some kicks, we missed an extra point, and we came away with nine points.

“It is impossible to win when you come up empty-handed like that. Unfortunately, when you have a first down conversion and you fumble and you miss kicks, it’s hard.”

Flacco, 37, didn’t have much time in the pocket as he was sacked four times and pressured consistently throughout the day.

“Obviously, frustrated,” said Flacco, who started in place of the injured Zach Wilson and fell to 0-6 with the Jets. “It wasn’t a good showing for us on offense as we never got into a rhythm.

“You just think it was some things we left out there. We just didn’t execute well enough and stuff that we really didn’t take advantage of. We just never turned the corner on some of the plays that we did have. We had some chunks, I felt like we had some chunks in the first half.”

It didn’t help the cause that starting left tackle Duane Brown was placed on injured reserve Saturday as he will miss at least the season’s first four games. George Fant, who was the team’s right tackle after Brown signed with the Jets, moved over to the left side. Max Mitchell also started at right tackle after being selected in the fourth round of April’s draft.

The Jets’ defense kept the team in the game as they trailed 10-3 at halftime and held the Ravens to 92 yards. However, Gang Green allowed two touchdowns and 182 yards in the second half.

“Defensively, I thought we came in and had a really good plan,” Saleh said. “I thought our guys came in and played with a lot of juice and energy.

“We gave up three explosive plays, unfortunately, two of them on third down that resulted in touchdowns and one of them was that 55-yard explosive play.

“Overall from the defense, we did a really good job going blow for blow with those dudes. I have a lot of respect for Lamar and their offense.”

Following punts by both sides on the game’s first two possessions, the Jets seemed like they were able to get something going offensive after a 24-yard pass to Elijah Moore.

But two plays later, Ravens safety Marcus Williams picked off Flacco at the Jets’ 46-yard-line and returned it to the 13-yard-line. That eventually registered the game’s first points as the Ravens took a 3-0 lead in the first quarter.

The Jets had an opportunity to tie the game in the second quarter as Flacco and Michael Carter helped drive the team down into Ravens territory. But kicker Greg Zuerlein missed a 45-yarder, giving Baltimore a short field as it started on its 38.

Two plays after a Lamarcus Joyner pass interference call, Jackson found Duvernay for a 25-yard touchdown which increased the Ravens lead to 10-0.

The Jets finally got on the board late in the second quarter as Zuerlein made his second 45-yard field goal attempt that made the score 10-3 at halftime.

After punts by both teams to begin the second half, the Ravens got excellent field position on the Jets’ 44-yard line because of a 20-yard punt by Braden Mann. That allowed the Ravens to drive down the field in six plays resulting in another Duvernay touchdown reception from Jackson, this time for 17 yards that made the score 24-3.

Later in the third quarter, Jackson threw his third TD pass to Bateman, this time for 55 yards, which increased their lead to 24-3.

“To say it is disappointing would be a discredit to all the good things that we did today,” Michael Carter II said. “Obviously, we want some things back, but they have a good quarterback.

“We were not that outmatched as we have a special team too and super talented. We just have to play more complementary football, I think that’s what it comes down to.”

With a minute left in the game, the Jets finally got into the end zone as Flacco completed a three-yard touchdown pass to tight end Tyler Conklin, but Zuerlein missed the extra point.

WEEK 2

The Jets will travel to Cleveland to take on the Browns in their home opener, and Baltimore will host the Miami Dolphins at M&T Bank Stadium.

()

google news
Advertisement

News

Trump’s attorney refused to sign false statement about Mar-a-Lago Docs: Reports

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Trump'S Attorney Refused To Sign False Statement About Mar-A-Lago Docs: Reports
google news

  • A lawyer has refused to back Donald Trump’s claim that he turned over all government records in January, according to reports.
  • The attorney, Alex Cannon, was involved in negotiations between Trump and the National Archives.
  • Months later, the FBI recovered caches of government documents from Mar-a-Lago during a search.

Trump attorney Alex Cannon declined to put his name to a statement by the former president saying he had returned all government records held at Mar-a-Lago, according to multiple reports.

Former President Donald Trump wanted to release a statement in January saying there were no more documents after many were turned over, The Washington Post first reported.

The report was later confirmed by The New York Times and CNN.

Cannon had acted as liaison between Trump and the National Archives as the agency repeatedly asked Trump to return documents he kept in Florida.

Trump’s push to make the statement came after Trump voluntarily returned 15 boxes of material, months before the FBI executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago and found no more documents.

But Cannon refused to take the message to the archives because he didn’t know if it was true, according to reports.

According to CNN, Cannon decided not to confirm the statement because he had handled the issue from New York and could not say whether all of the material held at Mar-a-Lago had been returned.

Shortly after, according to the report, Trump ordered her not to get involved in the case any further.

The statement claiming that all records had been returned was ultimately not released, according to reports.

In the boxes of documents Trump returned to them in January, the National Archives found highly classified information and alerted the Justice Department.

When FBI agents visited Mar-a-Lago in June, Trump aides turned over more boxes of government documents and a Trump lawyer signed a statement saying no classified documents wanted by the National Archives was still being held at Mar-a-Lago. , a claim similar to the January statement that was never sent,

But the FBI said it found numerous other classified documents when it ran its search, contradicting Trump’s earlier claims.

In court documents, the DOJ said Trump kept the material in a store and his private offices, stored haphazardly next to his personal effects.

Trump used a range of defenses in response to the raid, saying the investigation was part of a political plot to destroy him.

However, NARA and the DOJ have apparently made several attempts to resolve the issue without having to resort to obtaining a search warrant, after initially asking him to return the documents shortly after leaving office in 2021. .

Insider reached out to Cannon and Trump’s representatives for comment.

businessinsider

google news
Continue Reading

News

Giancarlo Stanton blasts 30th home run; Aaron Judge goes homerless again

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Giancarlo Stanton Blasts 30Th Home Run; Aaron Judge Goes Homerless Again
google news

ARLINGTON — Aaron Judge watched in the background.

Giancarlo Stanton blistered his 30th home run of the season Monday night to help the Yankees to a 3-1 win over the Rangers at Globe Life Park, but Stanton was being asked about Judge’s chase for his record-breaking 62nd homer of the season.

Judge made faces and laughed as he watched and listened.

So, no, the fourth straight game without a home run as the Yankees’ regular season has just three games left does not seem to have him pressing or anxious. It did have the 35,906 at the new ballpark disappointed though. They came to see Judge make history. Instead, he went 1-for-4 with a strikeout. His batting average remained at .311, now four points lower than Minnesota’s Luis Arraez who leads the American League.

If Judge is able to surpass Arraez’s batting average, the slugger will be in position to win the Triple Crown award. It would be the first Triple Crown winner since Miguel Cabrera won in 2012.

In the top of the ninth, Judge was on deck when Marwin Gonzalez popped out to end the inning. The pop up made the crowd boo loudly. Gonzalez denied them another chance to see Judge chase history.

In the eighth, Gonzalez led off with a homer off of Jonathan Hernandez and then Judge struck out swinging on a 99-mile an hour sinker.

Giancarlo Stanton followed with his 30th home run of the season. He is the third Yankee this season to hit at least 30 homers, joining Judge and Anthony Rizzo, who has 32. They are the first trio of Yankees to hit at least 30 homers in the same season since 2005, when Jason Giambi, Alex Rodriguez and Gary Sheffield did it.

Boone said that Judge could play in both games of a split doubleheader on Tuesday and his schedule is contingent on him hitting No. 62.

()

google news
Continue Reading

News

“I feel like I’ve been robbed”

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Cordina Left Ogawa Stunned Cold On The Canvas After A Monstrous Right Hand
google news

The IBF are notorious for being ruthless when it comes to enforcing their mandatory challengers and their latest victim is Joe Cordina.

The Welshman won the organization’s world title in June in stunning fashion, knocking out Kenichi Ogawa in the second round of their fight.

Cordina left Ogawa stunned cold on the canvas after a monstrous right hand

At the time, promoter Eddie Hearn reacted on Twitter saying, suggesting it was a knockout of the decade – or at least this year.

Cordina didn’t have long to relish the title, as he was quickly called up by the IBF to face their mandatory challenger, Shavkat Rakhimov, which was scheduled for November 5 in Abu Dhabi.

Recently, however, he was forced to pull out of his world title defense due to what appears to be a pretty horrific hand injury.

Shortly after, the IBF informed that following his withdrawal, he would be stripped of his world title.

Cordina reacted on Twitter by posting a photo of his injured hand, along with the caption: “Absolutely gutted.

“I worked all my life to become world champion and I didn’t even have the chance to defend the title.

“I feel like I’ve been robbed!”

Cordina Posted A Picture Of His Injured Hand, With Stitches, Explaining He Felt Robbed As The Ibf Stripped Him Of His Title

Twitter: @JoeCordina_91

Cordina posted a picture of his injured hand, with stitches, explaining he felt robbed as the IBF stripped him of his title


This isn’t the first time we’ve seen the IBF be particularly strict in enforcing their rules regarding mandatory challengers.

In 2019, Canelo was stripped of his IBF middleweight title, which he won from Daniel Jacobs a few months earlier.

This came after the Mexican failed to agree with his mandatory challenger Sergiy Derevyanchenko before the IBF deadline passed.

At the time, Canelo’s promoter Oscar De La Hoya expressed his frustration with the IBF, saying, “We are extremely disappointed in the IBF for forcing the best fighter in the world to relinquish his title. global. We conducted serious negotiations with the promoter of Sergiy Derevyanchenko.

“We offered his team an unprecedented amount of money for a fighter of his limited size and popularity, but the truth is I’m now certain they never intended to make a deal. . But instead they wanted to force us to give up Canelo’s belt.

“This is an insult to boxing and more importantly an insult to boxing fans around the world. This decision validates already existing concerns about the credibility of the IBF Championship.

Canelo'S Former Promoter De La Hoya Was Furious After Being Stripped Of His Ibf World Title

Tom Hogan – Hogan Photos/Golden Boy

Canelo’s former promoter De La Hoya was furious after being stripped of his IBF world title

Current WBC heavyweight champion Tyson Fury has also had issues with the IBF in the past, having beaten Wladimir Klitschko to win the unified WBA, WBO and IBF world titles in 2015.

Subsequently, Fury was contractually obligated to a rematch with Klitschko, but the IBF felt his proxy should have priority and therefore stripped him of the world title.

IBF President Lindsey Tucker said at the time: “As far as the Klitschko rematch is concerned, it’s quite the opposite, because the mandatory takes precedence over the rematch.”

In the end, it didn’t matter either way, as Fury relinquished all of his titles after taking a lengthy hiatus from the sport due to mental health issues.

OFFER OF THE DAY

NEW CUSTOMER OFFER

Save that hat-trick with Betway and get your money back (up to £30) if they lose – CLAIM HERE

  • Tottenham beat E. Frankfurt
  • Ajax beat Napoli
  • Barcelona beat Inter Milan

A £30 bet at 7/1 wins £240 or get your money back as a free bet!

Terms & Conditions: New UK customers only. Minimum deposit: £5. Maximum free bet: £30. First bet on a football or horse racing multiple with more than 3 selections. Overall rating: 3.00 (2/1) or better. Free bets available upon settlement of the qualifying bet. Debit card deposits only. Restrictions on deposit methods apply. This offer is valid for 7 days from the registration of your new account. 18+. BeGambleAware.org. Bet responsibly. Full terms apply.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;
n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,
document,’script’,’

fbq(‘init’, ‘752905198150451’);
fbq(‘track’, “PageView”);

Sports

google news
Continue Reading

News

Ravens are field-goal favorites over visiting Bengals in ‘Sunday Night Football’ matchup

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Ravens Are Field-Goal Favorites Over Visiting Bengals In ‘Sunday Night Football’ Matchup
google news

The Ravens are field-goal favorites over the Cincinnati Bengals ahead of their “Sunday Night Football” matchup at M&T Bank Stadium, according to Las Vegas sportsbooks.

Despite a 23-20 loss Sunday to the Buffalo Bills, their second straight second-half collapse at home, the Ravens (2-2) are favored by three points in their AFC North opener. The Bengals (2-2) are coming off a 27-15 home win over the previously undefeated Miami Dolphins and will have had three extra days of rest.

Cincinnati has won four of its past eight games in Baltimore and is 4-1 against the spread in its past five games against the host Ravens, according to CBS Sports. The Ravens, meanwhile, haven’t covered the spread in either of their two home games this season, though Sunday’s loss to Buffalo was a push.

The Ravens lead the all-time series 27-25 but were swept last season for the first time since 2015. The Bengals pulled away in Baltimore for a comfortable 41-17 win in Week 7 and later routed a depleted Ravens team in Week 16, 41-21.

The over-under for Sunday’s game is 48 1/2 points.

()

google news
Continue Reading

News

Voting Rights Act at risk of further dismantling in Supreme Court: NPR

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Voting Rights Act At Risk Of Further Dismantling In Supreme Court: Npr
google news

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

The Supreme Court Of The United States

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday in a case that could put another nail in the coffin of the historic Voting Rights Act, first passed in 1965 and aimed at eliminating racial discrimination against voters. minorities.

Since 2013, the Supreme Court has twice struck down or neutralized significant parts of the law. Now, once again, the law is on the chopping block — this time on the question of how state legislatures can draw constituency lines in Congress when state voters are racially polarized.

At issue is Alabama’s congressional redistricting plan passed by the state’s Republican legislature after the 2020 census. More than a quarter of the state’s population is African American, but in only 1 of 7 districts, minority voters have a realistic chance of electing the candidate of their choice. Black voters are either concentrated in this district, so that they form a supermajority there, or are spread across the remaining six districts, so that their voting power is diluted. This is a practice known as packing and cracking.

“Voting in Alabama is racially polarized, which means that black voters and white voters consistently vote for different candidates, especially when black candidates are on the ballot,” says election law expert Richard Pildes. And that, he says, “triggers the Voting Rights Act.”

How the lower courts ruled

The triggering of the Voting Rights Act is a big deal, with particular irony in this context. That’s because this case involves a provision that Congress amended in 1982 to correct what it saw as the Supreme Court’s misinterpretation of the law.

After the Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that suffrage advocates must prove intentional discrimination in order to invalidate an electoral system, Congress amended the law to specify that minority voters need only prove a result discrimination – a much easier thing to do than to prove intentional discrimination. The discriminatory outcome has been the norm ever since, upheld by the Supreme Court and applied by lower courts.

In January, a three-judge Federal Court panel unanimously ruled that Alabama could and should have created two compact congressional districts with a majority, or near a majority, of black voters: two districts instead of just one. Two of the judges on the panel were Trump appointees, the third a Clinton appointee.

The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which by a 5-4 vote blocked the lower court’s decision, which ordered a new map for the 2022 election, then nine months away. It was too much for Chief Justice John Roberts, a longtime critic of the Voting Rights Act, but who this time dissented with the three court liberals. He said he could find “no apparent error” in the lower court’s application of existing precedents.

The Alabama Argument

What he didn’t say was whether the court should revisit some of those precedents. And on Tuesday, the court hears arguments about whether to do just that. The question is whether to overturn or change previous decisions that have governed the law for more than 30 years. Existing precedents impose an “affirmative duty” on racially polarized voting to “give minority voters an equal opportunity to elect the candidates they prefer,” says Pildes, a professor at the University of New York’s law school. York.

He notes that Alabama’s arguments range from narrow arguments about how to interpret the 1982 Voting Rights Act amendments to more extreme arguments.

An extreme argument, Pildes says, is that the Voting Rights Act does not apply to legislative redistricting plans at all, even though the court has historically applied the law to such plans. “Or,” he said, “even more dramatically, that if [the Voting Rights Act] applies as the lower court held here, then the law is unconstitutional.”

Unconstitutional because it is based on the affirmative creation of a race-based compact second district. As Alabama put it in its briefs, by requiring a “race-based” redistricting map, the lower court indulged in “the harmful idea that redistricting begins and ends with racial considerations.” .

Against this argument, black voters argue that the state’s argument boils down to a backwards and forwards proposition: that any effort to eradicate racial discrimination is unconstitutional because it must emphasize on racial considerations.

NPR News

google news
Continue Reading

News

China seeks to ‘normalize’ military drills near island: Taiwan

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

China Seeks To 'Normalize' Military Drills Near Island: Taiwan
google news

China says its armed forces have the right to operate around Taiwan. (Case)

Taipei:

China is seeking to “normalize” its military activities near Taiwan, including crossing the center line of the Taiwan Strait, which poses an unprecedented challenge, Taiwan’s Defense Ministry said on Tuesday.

China, which considers the democratically-ruled island its own territory, waged war games including missile fire over Taipei in early August in response to a visit to Taiwan by the US House Speaker. United, Nancy Pelosi.

China’s military activities near Taiwan have continued at a much reduced level, although Chinese military aircraft still regularly cross the middle line of the Taiwan Strait, which previously served as an unofficial barrier between the two.

“In the future, the activities of Chinese Communist military aircraft and ships entering our air defense identification zone, crossing the median line and approaching sea areas near the island will gradually become more normalized,” he said. said the ministry.

“The national army faces an unprecedented challenge,” the ministry said in a report to parliament before Defense Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng answered lawmaker questions on Wednesday, a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters. .

China says its armed forces have the right to operate around Taiwan because it is Chinese territory.

The Taiwanese government has denounced Beijing’s threats and rejected China’s sovereignty claims, saying only the island’s 23 million people have the right to decide their future.

Taiwan will respond to China’s military threats by “appropriately” increasing its level of combat readiness and remaining on high alert, the ministry said.

As the world is distracted by the war in Ukraine, China is upgrading its armed forces and increasing pressure on Taiwan, the ministry said.

In its report seeking parliamentary approval for next year’s defense budget, the ministry also said it hoped to prioritize spending on ammunition and arms parts to respond to “the state of urgent combat readiness”.

The government has proposed $19 billion in defense spending for next year, a double-digit increase from 2022 that includes funds for new fighter jets.

(Except for the title, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

ndtv

google news
Continue Reading

Trending