Connect with us

News

Chrissy Teigen reveals the loss of her late son Jack was the result of a life-saving abortion

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Chrissy Teigen Reveals The Loss Of Her Late Son Jack Was The Result Of A Life-Saving Abortion
google news

Chrissy Teigen has revealed that her late son Jack’s death in September 2020 was the result of a life-saving abortion, not a miscarriage as she originally claimed.

John Legend’s wife, 36, has explained that she made the ‘difficult decision’ to terminate the pregnancy at 20 weeks after accepting that she and Jack would likely survive.

“Let’s call it that: it was an abortion. A life-saving abortion for a baby who had absolutely no chance. And to be honest, I never, ever put this together until, actually, a few months ago,’ Chrissy confessed, according to THR.

The couple previously said Jack died from complications caused by partial placental abruption, which is when the placenta breaks away from the uterus, depriving the baby of oxygen and causing the mother to bleed profusely. mother.

Explanation: Chrissy Teigen Has Revealed That Her Late Son Jack's Death In September 2020 Was The Result Of A Life-Saving Abortion, Not A Miscarriage As She Originally Claimed;  Chrissy Seen In March

Explanation: Chrissy Teigen has revealed that her late son Jack’s death in September 2020 was the result of a life-saving abortion, not a miscarriage as she originally claimed; Chrissy seen in March

Chrissy is currently pregnant with her and John’s fourth child. They share daughter Luna Simone, six, and son Miles Theodore, four.

She spoke candidly about her 2020 abortion during her appearance at Propper Daley’s “A Day of Unreasonable Talk” summit on Thursday in Beverly Hills.

“Two years ago when I was pregnant with Jack, John and my third child, I had to make many difficult and heartbreaking decisions,” the star began.

“It became very clear halfway through that he wouldn’t survive and neither would I without any medical intervention.”

'Tough Decision': John Legend's Wife, 36, Says She Made The 'Tough Decision' To Terminate The Pregnancy At 20 Weeks After Accepting That She And Jack Would Likely Survive

'Tough Decision': John Legend's Wife, 36, Says She Made The 'Tough Decision' To Terminate The Pregnancy At 20 Weeks After Accepting That She And Jack Would Likely Survive

‘Tough decision’: John Legend’s wife, 36, says she made the ‘tough decision’ to terminate the pregnancy at 20 weeks after accepting that she and Jack would likely survive

“Let's Call It That: It Was An Abortion.  A Life-Saving Abortion For A Baby Who Had Absolutely No Chance.  And To Be Honest, I Never, Ever Put This Together Until, In Fact, A Few Months Ago,' Chrissy Confessed, According To Thr

“Let's Call It That: It Was An Abortion.  A Life-Saving Abortion For A Baby Who Had Absolutely No Chance.  And To Be Honest, I Never, Ever Put This Together Until, In Fact, A Few Months Ago,' Chrissy Confessed, According To Thr

“Let’s call it that: it was an abortion. A life-saving abortion for a baby who had absolutely no chance. And to be honest, I never, ever put this together until, in fact, a few months ago,’ Chrissy confessed, according to THR

Although she long dismissed Jack’s death as a miscarriage, Chrissy said it was her husband John who helped her realize she had in fact had an abortion.

The revelation came amid the Supreme Court’s shock decision to overturn Roe V. Wade, which protected abortion rights, last June.

Chrissy admitted it came as a “shock” to her.

“I shut up, feeling weird that I didn’t understand it that way. I told the world we had a miscarriage, the world agreed we had a miscarriage, all the headlines said it was a miscarriage.

“And I got really frustrated that I didn’t say what it was in the first place, and I felt silly that it took me over a year to figure out that we had an abortion,” said she admitted.

Pending: Chrissy Is Currently Pregnant With Her And John's Fourth Child

Pending: Chrissy Is Currently Pregnant With Her And John's Fourth Child

Pending: Chrissy is currently pregnant with her and John’s fourth child

Family: They Share Daughter Luna Simone, Six, And Son Miles Theodore, Four;  Family Seen In April

Family: They Share Daughter Luna Simone, Six, And Son Miles Theodore, Four;  Family Seen In April

Family: They share daughter Luna Simone, six, and son Miles Theodore, four; family seen in april

During the final weeks of her pregnancy with Jack, Chrissy took to Instagram to report on her complications.

Specifically, the founder of Cravings was experience uncontrollable bleeding. She was forced to wear adult diapers and was bedridden.

On September 30, 2020, Chrissy returned to the platform to report that doctors were unable to control her bleeding despite multiple blood transfusions.

“We were never able to stop the bleeding and give our baby the fluids he needed, despite bags and bags of blood transfusions. It just wasn’t enough,’ she wrote, before revealing that Jack didn’t survive.

‘To our Jack – I’m so sorry that the first few moments of your life were met with so many complications, that we couldn’t give you the home you needed to survive. We will always love you,’ one read. another part of Chrissy’s message.

Along with her heartbreaking text, Chrissy included a slideshow of black and white photos of herself in a hospital bed as she and John mourned their child.

One photo showed the couple crying and cradling their deceased son, while another showed a distraught Chrissy sitting on the edge of her hospital bed with tears streaming down her face.

Heartbreaking: On September 30, 2020, Chrissy Returned To The Platform To Report That Doctors Were Unable To Control Her Bleeding Despite Multiple Blood Transfusions.

Heartbreaking: On September 30, 2020, Chrissy Returned To The Platform To Report That Doctors Were Unable To Control Her Bleeding Despite Multiple Blood Transfusions.

Heartbreaking: On September 30, 2020, Chrissy returned to the platform to report that doctors were unable to control her bleeding despite multiple blood transfusions.

Shortly after, she revealed that she would not be able to carry any more children, writing on Instagram: “I love being pregnant so much, and I am sad that I will never become pregnant again.”

In a blog post published on Medium in October 2020, Chrissy described how partial placental abruption drastically changed the course of her pregnancy.

“At this point, I had already accepted what was about to happen: I would have an epidural and I would have to deliver our 20-week-old child, a boy who would never have survived in my womb (please excuse these terms simple),” she said. writing.

In another excerpt, she recalled the time the doctor told her that Jack wouldn’t survive and that the pregnancy was also putting her own life at risk.

“After a few nights in hospital, my doctor told me exactly what I knew was coming – it was time to say goodbye. He wouldn’t survive this, and if it continued, neither would I.

In honor of Jack, Chrissy and John planted a tree in their house for him in Thai tradition.

“It is important to us in the Thai tradition that we always embrace those we have lost, and they are never, ever gone.”

“This tree being planted inside the house, the reason I wanted it was so that Jack’s ashes could be in this ground and he could be with us all the time and grow through the beautiful leaves of this tree,” she said.

Earlier this year, Chrissy informed fans that she was undergoing IVF treatment – despite previously claiming she would no longer be able to conceive.

She completed treatment in March and in August the couple confirmed they were expecting their fourth child together.

Miracle: She Completed Treatment In March And In August The Couple Confirmed They Were Expecting Their Fourth Child Together

Miracle: She Completed Treatment In March And In August The Couple Confirmed They Were Expecting Their Fourth Child Together

Miracle: She completed treatment in March and in August the couple confirmed they were expecting their fourth child together

Chrissy Teigen Reveals The Loss Of Her Late Son Jack Was The Result Of A Life-Saving Abortion

Chrissy Teigen Reveals The Loss Of Her Late Son Jack Was The Result Of A Life-Saving Abortion

“It was very hard to keep it so long!” she exclaimed in a pregnancy announcement post shared on Instagram in early August

Why abortions can save lives

Abortions are generally performed because women do not want to have children, or because their pregnancy was unplanned or unwanted.

They differ from miscarriages, which are unintentional and occur during the first 23 weeks of gestation.

However, in some cases, abortion is an emergency procedure necessary to save the life of the mother.

In England, Scotland and Wales, where a woman’s life is in danger or the baby is severely disabled, there is no time limit on access to abortion, under the Abortion Act 1967.

Conditions that may qualify include severe infections and severe cases of pre-eclampsia, in which a woman develops very high blood pressure and is at risk for stroke.

Another reason it may be needed is placental abruption, which is when the placenta detaches from the uterus, depriving the baby of oxygen and causing heavy bleeding in the mother.

But under the same law, if there is no risk, women can only legally terminate a pregnancy until the 23rd week.

Abortion is considered legal if it is performed by a doctor, authorized by two doctors acting “in good faith”, and meets at least one qualifying factor.

In the United States, the situation is different after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision to overturn Roe v Wade.

This highly controversial decision ended the legal right of American women to have abortions and left it up to each state to decide whether they are legal.

Two dozen conservative states already have or are likely to introduce new restrictions or bans on abortion.

That includes Georgia, which bans abortion at around six weeks of pregnancy — before many women even know they’re pregnant.

dailymail us

google news
Advertisement

News

Proud Boys member pleads guilty to seditious conspiracy in Capitol Riot

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Proud Boys Member Pleads Guilty To Seditious Conspiracy In Capitol Riot
google news

A North Carolina man pleaded guilty on Thursday to conspiring with other members of the far-right Proud Boys to violently prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election, making him the first member of the extremist group to plead guilty to a charge of seditious conspiracy.

Jeremy Joseph Bertino, 43, has agreed to cooperate with the Justice Department’s investigation into the role Proud Boys leaders played in the Jan. 6, 2021 mob attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, a prosecutor has said. federal.

Bertino’s cooperation could increase the pressure on the other Proud Boys charged with the siege, including former National President Henry “Enrique” Tarrio.

The guilty plea comes as the founder of another extremist group, the Oath Keepers, and four associates separately charged in the January 6 attack stand trial for seditious conspiracy – an offense rarely used in wartime civilian that requires up to 20 years behind bars.

Bertino traveled to Washington with other Proud Boys in December 2020 and was stabbed during a fight, according to court documents. He was not in Washington for the Jan. 6 riot because he was still recovering from his injuries, according to court documents.

Bertino participated in planning sessions in the days leading up to Jan. 6 and received encrypted messages as early as Jan. 4 that Proud Boys were planning to storm the Capitol, authorities say.

A statement of offense filed in court says Bertino understood the Proud Boys’ purpose in traveling to Washington was to prevent certification of Joe Biden’s victory and that the group was prepared to use force and violence if necessary to do so.

Bertino also pleaded guilty to an unlawful possession of firearms charge in March 2022 in Belmont, North Carolina. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly agreed to release Bertino pending a sentencing hearing, which was not immediately scheduled.

Justice Department prosecutor Erik Kenerson said the sentencing guidelines for Bertino’s case recommended a prison term ranging from four years and three months to five years and three months.

A trial is due to begin in December for Tarrio and four other members charged with seditious conspiracy: Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl and Dominic Pezzola. The charging document for Bertino’s case names these five defendants and a sixth member of the Proud Boys as his co-conspirators.

The indictment in the Tarrio case alleges that the Proud Boys held meetings and communicated via encrypted messages to plan the attack in the days leading up to January 6. On the day of the riot, authorities said, the Proud Boys dismantled metal barricades set up to protect the Capitol and mobilized, directed and led members of the crowd into the building.

Bertino’s video testimony was shown in June during the first hearing of the House committee investigating Jan. 6. The committee showed Bertino that the band’s membership had “tripled, probably” after Trump’s comment during a presidential debate that the Proud Boys should “step back and be ready.”

Tarrio was not in Washington on January 6, but authorities say he helped spark the violence that day. Police arrested Tarrio in Washington two days before the riot and accused him of vandalizing a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic black church during a protest in December 2020. Tarrio was released from prison on January 14 this year after serving his five-month sentence. for this case.

More than three dozen people charged in the Capitol riot have been identified by federal authorities as leaders, members or associates of the Proud Boys. Two – Matthew Greene and Charles Donohoe – pleaded guilty to conspiring to obstruct an official process, the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress to certify the Electoral College vote.

voanews

google news
Continue Reading

News

UPSC Recruitment 2022: Golden opportunity to get job in these posts in UPSC without examination, apply soon, salary will be available according to 7th pay

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Upsc Recruitment 2022: Golden Opportunity To Get Job In These Posts In Upsc Without Examination, Apply Soon, Salary Will Be Available According To 7Th Pay
google news

UPSC Recruitment 2022: Golden opportunity to get job in these posts in UPSC without examination, apply soon, salary will be available according to 7th pay

UPSC Recruitment 2022 Sarkari Naukri 2022: Before applying, candidates should read all these important things given carefully. Also, under this recruitment process, candidates can get jobs in UPSC (Govt Jobs).

UPSC Recruitment 2022: There is a good opportunity for the youth who are looking for a job (Sarkari Naukri) in the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). For this (UPSC Recruitment 2022), UPSC has sought applications for recruitment to other posts including Assistant Professor, Specialist Grade-III (UPSC Recruitment 2022). Interested and eligible candidates who want to apply for these posts (UPSC Recruitment 2022), they can apply by visiting the official website of UPSC, upsc.gov.in. The last date to apply for these posts (UPSC Recruitment 2022) is 13 October.

Apart from this, candidates can also directly apply for these posts (UPSC Recruitment 2022) through this link Also, by clicking on this link UPSC Recruitment 2022 Notification PDF , you can also see the official notification (UPSC Recruitment 2022). A total of 43 posts will be filled under this recruitment (UPSC Recruitment 2022) process.

Important Dates for UPSC Recruitment 2022

Last date to apply: 13 October

UPSC Recruitment 2022 Vacancy Details for

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Prosecutor(SFIO)-12

Specialist Grade III (General Medicine)-28

Assistant Professor (Ayurveda)-01

Assistant Professor (Unani)-01

Veterinary Officer-10

Eligibility Criteria for UPSC Recruitment 2022

Candidates should have the relevant qualification given in the official notification.

Application Fee for UPSC Recruitment 2022

Candidates will have to pay Rs 25 as application fee.

The post UPSC Recruitment 2022: Golden opportunity to get job in these posts in UPSC without examination, apply soon, salary will be available according to 7th pay appeared first on JK Breaking News.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Adam Carrington: The illegitimate attacks on the Supreme Court’s legitimacy

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Adam Carrington: The Illegitimate Attacks On The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy
google news

Legitimacy. The word has dominated discussion of the U.S. Supreme Court for years. Some, mostly on the left, claim that the court has lost its legitimacy. The debate on this question even has spread to the court itself, with comments on the matter made by Justices Elena Kagan, John Roberts and Samuel Alito over the summer.

But what does it mean for the current court to be illegitimate? Illegitimacy describes one or both of two conditions: First, it refers to someone occupying a position to which he or she possesses no right. Second, illegitimacy pinpoints the exercise of one’s power in ways flagrantly beyond its proper scope, so much so as to involve powers entirely foreign to the office.

Critics of the Supreme Court make both claims regarding its legitimacy. They argue the last three justices to be appointed — Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch — have no right to their seats. They further declare that recent decisions, especially during the court’s last term, go so far outside the court’s rightful powers as to make the institution itself illegitimate.

They are wrong on both counts. First, they morph the meaning of legitimacy into conformity with their preferences. They say that, in 2016, then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell never should have refused to confirm President Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, a move that led to Gorsuch’s appointment in 2017. They also claim that the unproven accusations made against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford disqualified him. Finally, they chafe at President Donald Trump’s nomination of Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, coming as it did right before the 2020 presidential election.

None of these accusations has anything to do with real legitimacy. In each case, the appropriate and constitutional process was followed. A sitting president made the nomination. The Senate either refused its consent, as it did in 2016, or gave it, as the body did in the cases of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett. That is the only standard for a justice’s legitimacy to be on the court. It is the only one because it is the constitutional one, the dictate of the supreme law of the land.

We may debate the fairness of refusing a vote on Obama’s nominee. We can argue over the merits of the accusations against Kavanaugh. We even can question the choice of not waiting for the people’s decision in 2020 before adding a new member to the bench. But even if all these objections were right, they would not make any of the appointed justices illegitimate.

On the second count, the court’s last term did not render it an illegitimate institution. Those accusers again seek to replace constitutional standards with their own opinions. To be sure, the court announced monumental decisions last term on a host of hot-button issues concerning religious liberty, gun rights, the administrative state and, of course, the abortion precedents of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Yet, too many attack these decisions based on whether they follow popular opinion. Kagan, for one, argues, “If, over time, the court loses all connection with the public and with public sentiment, that is a dangerous thing for democracy.” The court’s role, however, isn’t to follow the lead of often-flawed opinion polling. The justices follow the people’s will insofar as that will is expressed through the law — the Constitution and subordinate congressionally passed statutes. Both get their ultimate origin in “we, the people.” In this written form, they encompass a much more stable and discernible articulation of public sentiment.

Kagan also critiqued the majority’s approach to ascertaining the people’s will as expressed through law, indicating that the majority hide behind claims of impartially applying the words of laws as written in order to realize their policy preferences. “If you’re a textualist, you’re not a textualist just when it’s convenient. You’re not a textualist just when it leads to the outcomes that you personally happen to favor,” she said.

This accusation doesn’t hold up to scrutiny when turning to particular cases. Justices will certainly disagree on the precise meaning of legal texts. But in last term’s decisions, the majority painstakingly parsed the words of the laws and the accompanying history. They then ruled not on the basis of their partisanships but on what the law meant at the time of its composition. The abortion ruling did not outlaw terminating a pregnancy, as anti-abortion-rights activists would want, but merely returned the decision to the political process. The court’s decision on guns made extensive use of history to understand the nature of that right in relation to current law. Finally, the court’s limiting of the administrative state defended the principles of separation of powers and consent of the governed that are essential to our constitutional framework.

Critics of the current Supreme Court should be more honest in their attacks. They object to how certain justices were nominated. They disagree strongly with the court’s recent decisions. But, even if true, neither makes the current court illegitimate. They’d be better served to focus their arguments on the majority’s decisions and reasonings.

Given the rightness and strength of both, critics are in for an uphill battle.

Adam Carrington wrote this column for the Chicago Tribune.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Trudy Rubin: Putin is on the rocks. Ukraine is surging. If U.S. support stays strong, Kyiv can win

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Trudy Rubin: Putin Is On The Rocks. Ukraine Is Surging. If U.s. Support Stays Strong, Kyiv Can Win
google news

Last week was a turning point in Russia’s war on Ukraine. Kyiv’s astonishing gains will continue, and it is possible to envision a Ukrainian victory, so long as its Western supporters don’t lose their nerve.

After staging sham referendums at gunpoint in four occupied Ukrainian regions, Vladimir Putin announced Friday that residents had “chosen” to rejoin their “historic (Russian) motherland.” At a televised pop concert Friday in Red Square, he celebrated the forced annexation and led the chant of “Russia, Russia,” shouting exuberantly, “Welcome home!”

The very next day, Saturday, Ukrainian forces made stunning advances in the east and south, taking back land within the “annexed provinces” and breaking through Russian lines as they had in Kharkiv province earlier in September. Suddenly, over the weekend, the tightly controlled Russian airwaves that only broadcast Russian “victories” featured talk show debates over how to stem Russian losses.

Yet once again, Putin is hinting he might use nukes if desperate. Some of his acolytes are calling on him to use “tactical nuclear weapons.”

So where does Putin’s war go from here? Here are a few of the key questions and how I size up where things stand.

 

Are Ukrainians winning?

They are demonstrating that they can win — if Western support remains strong and new weapons arrive in time.

Putin’s imperialist call to restore the “unity” of “great historic Russia” revealed a total misunderstanding of the Ukrainian people. He conveniently ignored the fact that, in 1991, in a genuine referendum, every region of Ukraine voted overwhelmingly for independence from the Soviet Union (the four Putin annexed voted in 1991 by margins of 90%, 90%, 83% and 83%). Even Crimea voted 54% to join an independent Ukraine.

So Ukrainians rightly believe they are waging an existential battle for their freedom, while many Russian conscripts are unsure why they are fighting. As Secretary of State Antony Blinken put it succinctly, “If Russia stops fighting, the war ends. If Ukraine stops fighting, Ukraine ends.”

 

Is Russia losing?

Russian troops are demoralized. The Russian military system has become so disorganized that new troops are told to bring their own sleeping bags and food, and sent in with little or no training. Resistance is growing in Russia to Putin’s new, unjust mobilization of at least 300,000 new forces, from which hundreds of thousands are fleeing abroad.

New precise Western long-range multiple rocket systems with a range of 50 miles, especially the U.S.-built weapons known as HIMARS, have enabled Ukraine to disrupt Russian supply lines and command centers behind the front lines. The U.S. just announced it will send four more HIMARS to Ukraine; it should also expedite the arrival of long-range munitions for the launchers. Sending as much vital weaponry as possible before winter, and before the arrival of newly mobilized Russians, is key.

However, Russia still holds more than 15% of Ukrainian land, and its missiles and rockets are destroying civilian infrastructure across the country. “They are killing ordinary families and children every night in our cities,” I was told on WhatsApp by former parliament member Yehor Soboliev, who volunteered for military service. “We will win in any case, but we will meet many more deaths,” he said.

Kyiv military sources tell me their greatest need right now is for air-defense systems to protect their cities, and for tanks (where are those Leopard tanks, Germany?) to roll back fortified Russian positions as Ukrainian troops move forward on the flat steppe lands of the east and the south.

 

Would Putin use tactical nukes?

I am still skeptical that this will happen.

In military terms, it makes no sense. These weapons, with a much smaller payload than the Hiroshima bomb, are meant for the battlefield. But as the Institute for the Study of War, one of the best think tanks closely following the fighting, puts it: “The Russian military in its current state is almost certainly unable to operate on a nuclear battlefield even though it has the necessary equipment. Exhausted contract soldiers, hastily mobilized reservists, conscripts and mercenaries … could not function in a nuclear environment. Any areas affected by Russian tactical nuclear weapons would thus be impassable for the Russians, likely precluding Russian advances.”

Moreover, the wind could blow radiation back onto Russian troops or even inside Russia. And if a tactical nuclear weapon were dropped on a city, killing, say, 5,000 to 10,000 civilians, Russia would become a global outlaw, even to India and China. And the Ukrainians would keep fighting.

That said, the U.S. and its allies must leave Putin in no doubt that there would be “catastrophic consequences for Russia” — as national security adviser Jake Sullivan put it on ABC News — if Russia breaks the post-World War II taboo against nuclear weapons, plunging the world into a new nuclear era. That doesn’t necessarily mean a nuclear response, but it should mean military strikes by NATO members on Russian bases inside Ukraine, Russian ships in the Black Sea, and possibly on Russian bases in the homeland. It should also finally trigger a NATO invitation to Ukraine.

“Putin has to know it would be a suicide weapon for them,” I was told by H.R. McMaster, a former national security adviser in the Trump administration. Yes, indeed.

 

Will Europe hold strong in support of Ukraine?

In a historic first joint visit to Pennsylvania Monday, a large group of ambassadors from European Union countries insisted that Europe would hold firm in support for Ukraine, despite the pain of skyrocketing gas prices, and despite far-right gains in Swedish and Italian elections. Speaking to the Foreign Policy Research Institute and the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia, Stavros Lambrinidis, the EU ambassador to the United States, said: “Putin cannot win this. It is existential to all of us. This is not a war against Russia. It is a battle for values. You don’t invade to wipe countries off the map.”

Ukrainian courage and strategic skills, combined with Western intelligence-sharing, have opened the way for a Ukrainian victory before winter. All now depends on whether Western allies have the guts to match their Ukrainian compatriots with vital weapons and a united front against Putin. Kyiv is fighting not just for Ukraine’s freedom, but to prevent Putin from threatening Europe and, inevitably, the United States.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Vikings bring back linebacker Ryan Connelly on practice squad

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Vikings Bring Back Linebacker Ryan Connelly On Practice Squad
google news

It was an eventful week for Ryan Connelly.

The Vikings on Thursday signed the linebacker to the practice squad. That came after Connelly, an Eden Prairie native, was activated off the physical unable to perform list Tuesday and then waived Wednesday. He rejoined the Vikings immediately after clearing waivers.

Connelly, in his fourth NFL season, first joined the Vikings in 2020 after being waived by the New York Giants. He got into 14 games in 2020 and 12 in 2021 for Minnesota before suffering a torn ACL last December.

google news
Continue Reading

News

Youth is served: Heat’s Nikola Jovic still awaiting his . . . high school final exam

Avatar Of Rajesh Khanna

Published

on

Youth Is Served: Heat’s Nikola Jovic Still Awaiting His . . . High School Final Exam
google news

Nikola Jovic had the Miami Heat locker room abuzz after Thursday night’s 109-80 exhibition victory over the Brooklyn Nets at Barclays Center, and for more than the first-round pick out of Serbia closing with 10 rebounds and five assists.

Instead, it was the reaction to what coach Erik Spoelstra had revealed moments earlier about the skilled 6-foot-10 19-year-old.

“He’s extremely unique,” Spoelstra said, before turning his attention to Friday night’s exhibition against the Memphis Grizzlies at FedExForum. “And he’s so young. To put it in perspective, he’s still waiting to do his final exam to graduate from high school, and doing that over Zoom.”

Wait? What?

That essentially was the reaction from teammates, once Spoelstra’s revelation circulated.

Backup center Dewayne Dedmon was taken aback, with the 33-year-old big man incredulous about a teammate young enough to have yet to complete high school.

Jovic: “I was supposed to finish it this summer.”

Dedmon: “Supposed to?”

Jovic: “I’m finishing.”

Dedmon: “So you not even graduated high school?”

Jovic: “I’m finishing it right now.”

Dedmon: “And you in the NBA?”

Jovic: “Yeah.”

Dedmon: “You know you can’t go from high school to the pros?”

Jovic: “You can do it from Europe.”

Dedmon: “Apparently.”

With that, head shaking, Dedmon headed for the team bus, leaving his Serbian teammate to explain.

“They were doing it when I was doing the draft workouts,” he said of his high-school finals while he was working in Miami ahead of the June draft, “so I didn’t have time, especially because of the time difference.”

There will, Jovic said, be a diploma.

“It’s not that hard,” he said of his lone remaining test. “I need to take it. I don’t have time to take it right now.”

But he has reason to make sure it is completed sooner rather than later.

“My mom,” he said, “she wants me to finish school.”

While the NBA draft rule is written with high school in mind, it actually requires a player to be at least 19 in his draft year. Jovic was born June 9, 2003.

“As soon as I get some time, I’ll do it,” he said, having been in Miami since August preparing for his inaugural NBA season after playing professionally in Europe, “as soon as I get in contact with my teachers and stuff. Like I said, the time difference.”

And there will be more.

“I”m really glad I’m finishing it now,” he said. “I’m looking forward to doing something else after this, some college or something.”

All of which made his comments about his first NBA road game all the more fascinating.

“In high school, I used to go home and watch some of those guys on TV or on YouTube,” he said, “and to play against them is different.”

As in this year in high school.

To Spoelstra, it is a whole new world with the lithe 205-pound No. 27 pick.

“We’ve had a lot of different developmental projects over the years,” he said. “He’s a little bit of a unique one. We haven’t had a European so young. But his skill set is unique. Because of his size, he’s really just starting his weight lifting program with us for the last six weeks. So we won’t even see the benefit of that until next summer.

“But his ability to handle, to shoot, to put the ball on the floor, he’s a really good passer. That’s probably, at this point, his best skill. And he’s developing all the rest of it.”

()

google news
Continue Reading

Trending