NEW YORK (AP) — Does signing up for Disney’s widespread streaming service imply you could have agreed to by no means sue the leisure big over something perpetually?

That’s what Disney argues in a wrongful loss of life lawsuit involving a 42-year-old New York physician whose household claims had a deadly allergic response after consuming at an Irish pub in Disney Springs in October.

Disney is asking a Florida courtroom to dismiss a lawsuit introduced by Jeffrey Piccolo, the husband of Kanokporn Tangsuan, a household medication specialist with NYU Langone’s workplace in Carle Place, on Lengthy Island.

The corporate argues Piccolo had agreed to settle any lawsuits towards Disney out of courtroom by way of the arbitration course of when he signed up for a one-month trial of Disney+ in 2019 and acknowledged that he had reviewed the high-quality print.

“The Phrases of Use, which have been supplied with the Subscriber Settlement, embody a binding arbitration clause,” the corporate wrote in its movement. “The primary web page of the Subscriber Settlement states, in all capital letters, that ‘any dispute between You and Us, Apart from Small Claims, is topic to a category motion waiver and have to be resolved by particular person binding arbitration’.”

However Piccolo’s lawyer, in a response filed earlier this month, argued that it was “absurd” to consider that the greater than 150 million subscribers to Disney+ have waived all rights to sue the corporate and its associates in perpetuity — even when their case has nothing to do with the favored streaming service.

“The notion that phrases agreed to by a client when making a Disney+ free trial account would perpetually bar that client’s proper to a jury trial in any dispute with any Disney affiliate or subsidiary, is so outrageously unreasonable and unfair as to shock the judicial conscience, and this courtroom shouldn’t implement such an settlement,” Brian Denney, Piccolo’s legal professional, wrote within the Aug. 2 submitting.

Spokespersons for the Walt Disney Firm and Raglan Street, the pub in Disney Springs the place Tangsuan dined, didn’t instantly reply to emails searching for remark Wednesday.

However Disney, in its Could 31 submitting, argued that whether or not Piccolo really reviewed the service phrases is “immaterial.” It additionally famous the arbitration provision “covers ‘all disputes’ together with ‘disputes involving The Walt Disney Firm or its associates’.”

Arbitration permits folks to settle disputes with out going to courtroom and usually entails a impartial arbitrator who critiques arguments and proof earlier than making a binding choice, or award.

Piccolo’s lawsuit, which was filed in February, claims that he, his spouse and his mom ate on the Raglan Street Irish Pub in Disney Springs, an out of doors procuring, eating and leisure advanced at Disney World, on Oct. 5, 2023.

After informing their server quite a few instances that she had a extreme allergy to nuts and dairy merchandise and required “allergen-free meals,” Tangsuan ordered the vegan fritter, scallops, onion rings and a vegan shepherd’s pie.

The waiter then “assured” that the meals was allergen-free despite the fact that a number of the gadgets weren’t served with “allergen free flags,” the lawsuit states.

About 45 minutes after ending their dinner, Tangsuan had issue respiratory whereas out procuring, collapsed and ultimately died on the hospital, regardless of self-administering an EpiPen in the course of the allergic response, in response to the lawsuit.

A medical expert’s investigation decided later she died on account of “anaphylaxis as a consequence of elevated ranges of dairy and nut in her system,” the lawsuit mentioned.

An Oct. 2 listening to has been scheduled on Disney’s movement in county courtroom in Orlando. Piccolo seeks greater than $50,000 in his lawsuit.