DALLAS (CelebrityAccess) — A federal decide in Texas has blocked a brand new rule from the Federal Commerce Fee (FTC) that bans using Non-Compete clauses in employment contracts.

The clauses, which usually ban former workers from becoming a member of or launching rival corporations, are a typical fixture of employment contracts inside the dwell leisure trade.

In line with Reuters, U.S. District Choose Ada Brown in Dallas dominated that the FTC doesn’t have the statutory authority to ban enterprise practices that it deems unfair by adopting broad guidelines.

Moreover, Choose Brown’s ruling notes that whereas Congress expressly granted the FTC authority below the Magnuson-Moss Act of 1975 to create substantive guidelines barring unfair practices, that authority doesn’t lengthen to unfair strategies of competitors.

As nicely, the court docket concluded that the FTC’s rule was “unreasonably overbroad” and failed to deal with potential options.

The FTC’s prohibition on non-competes was scheduled to take impact on Sept. 4.

Brown was nominated to the Federal Bench by former President Donald Trump in 2019.

The choice was lauded by Suzanne Clark, President and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a plaintiff within the case.

“This choice is a major win within the Chamber’s combat towards authorities micromanagement of enterprise choices,” U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Suzanne P. Clark mentioned. “A sweeping prohibition of noncompete agreements by the FTC was an illegal extension of energy that will have put American staff, companies, and our economic system at a aggressive drawback. We stay dedicated to holding the FTC — and all companies — accountable to the rule of regulation, making certain American staff and companies can thrive.”

A rep for the FTC advised Reuters that an enchantment of the choice was into account.