Lawmakers advance measure opening Wyoming to possible nuclear fuel waste storage

Lawmakers advance measure opening Wyoming to possible nuclear fuel waste storage

by Dustin Bleizeffer, WyoFile

With a handful of dissenting votes, a legislative panel has superior a draft measure that proponents say merely offers the chance to debate altering Wyoming statutes to allow non permanent storage of high-level radioactive gasoline waste from nuclear energy vegetation.

The Minerals, Enterprise and Financial Improvement Committee on Tuesday voted in favor of the draft invoice Used nuclear gasoline storage-amendments, which suggests the committee will sponsor the measure when the complete Legislature convenes in January. 

Committee Co-chairman Rep. Donald Burkhart Jr. (R-Rawlins), a longtime proponent of bringing nuclear gasoline waste into the state, first rolled out the potential for brand spanking new laws concerning the matter in July, however neither he nor the committee shared a draft of the proposed laws till weeks earlier than the October assembly. The invoice draft would amend previous laws principally to align current state statute with up to date language concerning industrial nuclear waste storage with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Fee and the Division of Power, Burkhart mentioned.

“This isn’t a dialogue of why or why to not have this,” Burkhart mentioned on the onset of the dialogue, including that the committee took up the problem on the request of the Legislature’s Regulatory Discount Job Pressure. “That is merely to amend the present statute.”

A spent nuclear gasoline cask is moved on the Surry Energy Station nuclear plant in Virginia in 2007. (Nuclear Regulatory Fee/FlickrCommons)

Burkhart was clear in July when he notified his fellow committee members of the pending proposal in draft type — which he shared with them, however not with the general public — that nuclear storage held monetary promise. The outlook for Wyoming’s fossil fuel-dependent finances is trending downward, and the state may reap greater than $4 billion a yr from nuclear waste storage, “simply to allow us to preserve it right here in Wyoming,” he mentioned then.

Additionally in July, Burkhart mentioned he’d not too long ago visited with a personal landowner in Fremont County who, as up to now, is desirous about promoting land for such a storage facility. The land buy would value an estimated $2 million, Burkhart had mentioned, and it could value about $400 million to construct the ability. “None of which might come from the state,” he mentioned. “It will all come from non-public enterprise.”

Burkhart didn’t talk about such particulars on Tuesday and mentioned “present statutes in Wyoming battle with the [Nuclear Regulatory Commission] rules, and we have to deliver them in line.”

The need to open Wyoming to the nation’s spent nuclear energy plant gasoline, nevertheless, is nothing new. Then-Gov. Mike Sullivan, after months of statewide debate, vetoed a measure in 1992 that may have opened the state to storing the waste. Although the Legislature has since up to date statutes to accommodate spent nuclear gasoline waste from nuclear energy vegetation within the state, there stays a statute prohibiting a industrial high-level radioactive waste facility except the federal authorities establishes a everlasting repository. 

The draft measure wouldn’t change that statute, but opponents mentioned it opens the door to an unpopular concept that Wyoming — in addition to Texas, Nevada and different states — have rejected many instances.

Greater than 100 individuals attended the Nuclear Regulatory Fee’s public data periods Nov. 7, 2023, in Kemmerer. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“We’re a bit alarmed on the velocity at which this subject, specifically, has come about,” Wyoming Outside Council Government Director Carl Fisher instructed the committee. “One in all our considerations about this laws is the dearth of public engagement the place we’re type of trying to federal businesses to convene [discussion on] this, however [Wyoming is] not convening native public processes round impacts on communities.

“This implies our communities, the tourism we’re reliant upon, our wildlife, our water, our wildlands, will probably be subjected to a poisonous legacy that stems from a rush choice,” Fisher added.

Jill Morrison, who lobbied towards related measures up to now, famous that the draft invoice requires solely 30 days’ discover to the general public earlier than graduation of building for such a facility.

“Coping with high-level radioactive waste isn’t a easy matter,” Morrison instructed the committee. “And it’s been rejected by the state of Wyoming — by the general public — thrice. I feel the individuals of this state [should] get a chance to weigh in on one thing like this.” 

Earlier within the day, the committee heard testimony from Nuclear Regulatory Fee allowing officers who mentioned they absolutely vet such services, together with a number of alternatives for public enter in addition to an opportunity to protest a storage web site proposal. Sen. Ed Cooper (R-Ten Sleep) mentioned the NRC’s assurance ought to guarantee a full environmental evaluation and public enter course of.

A barrel of radioactive waste is seen by a catwalk on the Smith Ranch-Highland in-situ uranium mine in Wyoming. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

“I feel simply saying that we completely don’t need used gasoline storage in Wyoming — to simply say that may be very close-minded,” Cooper mentioned. “I’m unsure that we do need it in Wyoming, and that’s not what this invoice is doing. It’s merely permitting the dialogue to maneuver ahead with the definitions assembly the NRC and the [Department of Energy] language.”

Former Senate President Eli Bebout, a longtime proponent of storing spent nuclear gasoline waste in Wyoming, additionally spoke in favor of the measure “so we are able to actually have a look at this factor in depth,” he mentioned.

“Nuclear energy has made an enormous comeback,” mentioned Bebout, who lives in Fremont County. “I’ve been a proponent of nuclear energy for 25 or 30 years. It’s one of many final issues left, I feel, to essentially assist this case we’ve got in America.”

Federal efforts to ascertain a everlasting storage facility for high-level radioactive waste are presently led by the Division of Power by its consent-based siting program — a course of for communities to ascertain broad native assist for internet hosting such a facility. 

“There is no such thing as a everlasting repository and actually no motion in direction of one,” NRC spokesman David McIntyre instructed WyoFile in July.


This text was initially revealed by WyoFile and is republished right here with permission. WyoFile is an unbiased nonprofit information group targeted on Wyoming individuals, locations and coverage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *