Meta META chief Mark Zuckerberg pointed the finger on the federal authorities for pushing the platform to censor pandemic-related content material — and lamented not preventing again tougher.

“In 2021, senior officers from the Biden Administration, together with the White Home, repeatedly pressured our groups for months to censor sure COVID-19 content material, together with humor and satire, and expressed a variety of frustration with our groups once we didn’t agree,” Zuckerberg wrote in a letter addressed to Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the Republican-led Home Judiciary Committee.

The committee printed the letter on its Fb web page and X account Monday.

Zuckerberg added that the federal government “expressed a variety of frustration” when the Fb and Instagram mother or father disagreed with the administration. Within the wake of the strain, nonetheless, Meta took the content material down — a choice Zuckerberg appeared to specific remorse over.

“I consider the federal government strain was fallacious, and I remorse we weren’t extra outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg mentioned. “I additionally assume we made some decisions that, with the good thing about hindsight and new info, we wouldn’t make immediately.”

If that state of affairs have been to occur once more, Zuckerberg mentioned the platform could be “able to push again.”

From April via June 2021, as COVID-19 vaccines have been starting to be rolled out to the broader public, Meta mentioned it eliminated 20 million posts from Fb and Instagram globally for violating its insurance policies on COVID-19-related misinformation. Meta has lengthy been on the forefront of the battle in opposition to on-line disinformation, and publishes quarterly menace studies.

In response to the letter, the White Home mentioned in a assertion to the Related Press: “When confronted with a lethal pandemic, this Administration inspired accountable actions to guard public well being and security. Our place has been clear and constant: we consider tech firms and different non-public actors ought to have in mind the results their actions have on the American folks, whereas making impartial decisions in regards to the info they current.”

Specialists have mentioned it shouldn’t be as much as social media platforms to name the pictures on misinformation. Tara Kirk Promote, a senior scholar on the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Public Well being’s Heart for Well being Safety, has argued that such steerage ought to be developed by a nationwide fee that “supplies impartial, evidence-based steerage and suggestions to be able to enhance the well being communication panorama.”