J.K. Rowling Weighs In on HBO’s New Harry Potter Adaptation

J.Ok. Rowling had a sneak peek on the upcoming HBO Harry Potter collection, and he or she’s letting followers know what she thinks concerning the present.

“I learn the primary two episodes of the forthcoming HBO Harry Potter collection and they’re SO, So, SO GOOD!” Rowling, 59, shared via X on Saturday, June 21.

Throughout Warner Bros. Discovery presentation in April 2023, the community revealed they have been shifting ahead with a TV reboot of the author’s iconic novels and subsequent movies for his or her streaming service, Max, with a “decade-long collection” that may function an entire new solid.

“Max’s dedication to preserving the integrity of my books is necessary to me, and I’m trying ahead to being a part of this new adaptation which is able to permit for a level of depth and element solely afforded by an extended type tv collection,” Rowling, an govt producer on the venture,” mentioned in a press release on the time.

Harry Potter Stars Where Are They Now

Associated: ‘Harry Potter’ Stars: The place Are They Now?

Over the course of 10 years, the celebrities of Harry Potter introduced magic, mischief and extra to tens of millions of followers all over the world. Primarily based on the collection of seven books by J.Ok. Rowling, stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint captured the hearts of viewers between 2001 and 2011 as Harry Potter, Hermione Granger […]

On Saturday, Rowling clarified by way of X that she isn’t a author on the present, telling one fan that she has “labored intently with the extraordinarily proficient writers” on the collection.

Regardless of her success with the franchise, Rowling has discovered herself in sizzling water through the years because of her continued transphobic feedback. Stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint — who portrayed Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, respectively, in all eight Potter movies — have spoken out towards her remarks.

“I firmly stand with the trans neighborhood,” Grint mentioned in a press release to Us Weekly in June 2020. “Trans ladies are ladies. Trans males are males. We must always all be entitled to dwell with love and with out judgment.”

Whereas the collection will function an entire new solid, Rowling’s stance on trans rights and trans athletes has already seemingly impacted the upcoming collection after Paapa Essiedu, who will play Professor Severus Snap within the upcoming collection, signed an open letter to the UK’s leisure business in assist of the trans neighborhood.

The petition, signed by over 400 others together with Eddie Redmayne and Katie Leung, urged the business to publicly decide to defending trans folks after the U.Ok. Supreme Court docket dominated that trans ladies shouldn’t be acknowledged as ladies — a ruling Rowling overtly supported and celebrated.

J.K. Rowling Blasts Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and More Stars for Supporting Trans Rights

Associated: J.Ok. Rowling Blasts Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson for Trans Rights Help

J.Ok. Rowling had harsh phrases for Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and extra stars who don’t agree together with her transgender views. The Harry Potter writer, who has been criticized for her anti-trans feedback through the years, shared an article by way of X on Wednesday, April 10, about “medical proof for transitioning kids.” A fan replied to […]

Rowling seemingly referred to the petition and people who signed it in a publish shared by way of X, although she didn’t identify Essiedu.

“Some argue that signatories of those kinds of letters are motivated by concern: concern for his or her careers, after all, but in addition concern of their co-religionists, who embrace offended, narcissistic males who threaten and generally enact violence on non-believers; back-stabbing colleagues ever able to report wrongthink,” Rowling wrote on the time.

After followers began speculating that Rowling would find yourself firing Essiedu, she took to social media to clear up what she will be able to, and can’t, do in terms of the present.

“I don’t have the facility to sack an actor from the collection and I wouldn’t train it if I did. I don’t imagine in taking away folks’s jobs or livelihoods as a result of they maintain legally protected beliefs that differ from mine,” she wrote.

Scroll to Top