WME Settles Conflict of Interest Lawsuit From ‘La La Land’ Composer

WME and La La Land composer Justin Hurwitz have settled a lawsuit accusing the company of a battle of curiosity when it produced dwell orchestral exhibits of the film utilizing his rating whereas largely locking him out of income from the touring live-to-film concert events.

“The Events are completely happy to report that they’ve resolved their variations,” WME mentioned in an announcement. Phrases of the deal weren’t disclosed.

Hurwitz, in a lawsuit filed in 2022 in Los Angeles Superior Court docket, claimed that WME abused its relationship with him to safe a license from Lionsgate for a La La Land tour, “solely to self-deal by competing straight towards” him for the income from the concert events. Since then, different companies reminiscent of CAA have sustained allegations of self-dealing in lawsuits from expertise reminiscent of Terrence Howard and Sage Steele.

WME began representing Hurwitz in 2010, first as a author after which as a composer, in response to the grievance.

After Hurwitz gained Academy Awards for greatest unique rating and music in La La Land, WME approached him about crediting itself as producers for a live performance tour that may characteristic a dwell orchestral efficiency of the rating, the lawsuit says. He was allegedly advised that he would have proper of first refusal to conduct all live performance performances, for which he’d be paid $50,000 no matter whether or not he carried out. Beneath his take care of WME, Hurwitz was underneath the assumption that the company acquired a ten p.c lower of the conducting charges however didn’t know that it was additionally entitled to fastened revenue participation from every efficiency of the tour as a producer. If he’d identified, Hurwitz says he would’ve demanded further compensation.

“WME bought its personal shopper a invoice of products, abusing its company relationship with Hurwitz with the intention to safe the license for the tour of La La Land in Live performance — solely to self-deal by competing straight towards Hurwitz for the income from the tour,” the grievance states.

The lawsuit claims that the company repeatedly lied to him about how a lot cash it was set to make from the tour, “convincing Hurwitz to just accept a minimal piece of the pie.” And to keep away from paying the composer a $50,000 price for conducting exhibits, WME advised him there wasn’t sufficient cash to rent him when, in actuality, the funds was constrained by a set price it was taking for producing the performances.

“Hurwitz discovered himself within the absurd place of being denied the chance to work by his personal expertise agent on a venture by which his expertise agent was supposedly representing him,” the grievance acknowledged. “Consequently, the talent-talent company relationship had been turned the other way up.”

Hurwitz superior claims for breach of fiduciary obligation, breach of contract and fraud, amongst others, over WME allegedly mendacity in regards to the battle of curiosity.

Leave a Reply