By ALI SWENSON
NEW YORK (AP) — Hours after an obvious try on Donald Trump’s life over the weekend, Elon Musk took to his social platform X to submit a considering emoji and a remark that “nobody is even attempting to assassinate” the Democratic president and vp.
Within the midst of anti-Muslim riots within the U.Okay. — which had been ginned up by a false rumor — Musk declared that “civil conflict is inevitable” within the nation.
And when an nameless X consumer distorted information to assert a surge in sketchy voter registrations in three U.S. states, Musk amplified the false submit and referred to as it “extraordinarily regarding.”
All three posts sparked fast backlash from public officers who referred to as Musk’s phrases irresponsible and deceptive. As his phrases amass thousands and thousands of views and 1000’s of shares, additionally they illustrate the flexibility of one of many world’s most influential individuals to unfold worry, hate and misinformation throughout fraught political moments world wide. That is very true as a result of he owns the social platform that was once Twitter, giving Musk the authority to form how its content material reaches customers.
Musk’s inaccurate posts to his 200 million followers alongside together with his web site’s lack of guardrails are elevating considerations about how he might manipulate public belief as Election Day within the U.S. attracts nearer. He not too long ago endorsed Trump’s presidential bid and has change into extra personally invested in politics — even agreeing to guide a authorities effectivity fee if Trump wins reelection.
Trump gave a shoutout to Musk throughout an occasion on X Monday night, basking within the tech billionaire’s endorsement and referring to him as his “pal.” Musk didn’t reply to an emailed request for remark.
On the very least, consultants and election officers fear that Musk might affect individuals to query the legitimacy of the vote. However additionally they are involved his phrases might encourage threats and violence towards election staff or candidates.
“X and Musk are elevating the temperature of politics dangerously and irresponsibly at a crucial second,” mentioned Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the World Venture In opposition to Hate and Extremism. “It’s shameful.”
The 53-year-old billionaire who purchased and remodeled Twitter in 2022 has modeled his social media web site as a market of concepts the place individuals can converse freely with out censorship, a transfer that has been cheered by many conservatives. He typically has touted X as a superior information supply to the mainstream media, one the place customers can submit with out worry and discern the “reality.”
But the adjustments Musk has made to the corporate over two years even have allowed false data to unfold largely unchecked.
He has dismantled the corporate’s Belief and Security advisory group and stopped implementing content material moderation and hate speech guidelines that the positioning adopted earlier than his takeover. He has restored the accounts of conspiracy theorists, incentivized engagement on the platform with payouts and content material partnerships, and instituted a Neighborhood Notes function that at occasions leads to deceptive feedback being positioned on posts.
Baseless claims from either side of the political spectrum rack up 1000’s of shares on Musk’s X. After a gunman shot Trump within the ear in an tried assassination in Pennsylvania, far-left customers shared false conspiracy theories that the previous president had set it up. And after the controversy between Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, far-right customers unfold a bogus declare that Harris was sporting an earpiece.
Rick Hasen, a regulation professor on the College of California, Los Angeles, mentioned Musk has degraded the positioning in order that it’s only a shadow of what it was in 2020, when it was considered a reasonably dependable clearinghouse for data.
“Twitter, or X, has a really totally different public status now. There’s a motive thousands and thousands of individuals left the platform and advertisers left,” Hasen mentioned. “He’s spreading horrible messages. … The query is will {the marketplace} of concepts work nicely sufficient” that individuals will acknowledge these messages as untrustworthy, Hasen added.
Musk and lots of Republicans disagree with that sentiment. They are saying the positioning below its earlier possession unfairly censored correct details about COVID-19’s origins and President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden when the information weren’t instantly out there.
Musk makes use of his platform to submit about his corporations Tesla and SpaceX, to share his private views that extra individuals have to be having youngsters, and to make jokes in response to memes and different content material that he finds entertaining. He additionally has more and more used the positioning to amplify unfounded claims from politicians, together with that Democrats are “importing” migrants into the nation to vote and that Haitian migrants in Ohio are killing and consuming pets.
Jocelyn Benson, Michigan’s Democratic secretary of state, mentioned in an interview earlier this month that Musk’s election postings have created a “maelstrom of disinformation” that makes it tougher for many who run elections to empower voters with the information.
“I do know the overwhelming majority of election directors simply attempt to maintain their heads down and do the work,” she mentioned. “The problem is, how can we get details about our work out to residents, lots of whom comply with Musk or are members of X, or on the platform?”
Some election officers have tried partaking with Musk instantly to coach him and his followers. In July, the Republican recorder chargeable for elections in Maricopa County, Arizona, which incorporates Phoenix, invited Musk by way of an X submit to an all-access tour of the county’s election facility.
Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, a Democrat, organized a letter to Musk with 4 different secretaries of state this summer season when Musk’s AI platform, Grok, was posting incorrect details about election guidelines. He mentioned Musk deserved credit score for belatedly correcting that misinformation.
Simon mentioned that earlier than Musk purchased Twitter, the platform was useful in correcting election misinformation and that he hopes Musk can do the identical, no matter his private beliefs.
“It’s one factor in the event you don’t like this election system or that election system in Minnesota,” Simon mentioned, however factually false details about voting must be fastened.
Jen Easterly, director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company, additionally commented final month on one in all Musk’s posts to appropriate a false impression that the majority elections within the U.S. do not use paper ballots. She wrote that over the past presidential election in 2020, “all States w/shut presidential vote counts truly used paper data, permitting votes to be counted, recounted, & audited to make sure accuracy.”
The X proprietor has at occasions backtracked when he acknowledges his posts had been ill-advised. Earlier this month, he sparked outrage when one in all his posts promoted an interview between the right-wing podcast host Tucker Carlson and a Holocaust revisionist. He then deleted it.
Musk additionally deleted Sunday’s submit musing about how Biden and Harris had not been focused by assassination makes an attempt. White Home spokesperson Andrew Bates nonetheless responded to name the submit “irresponsible” and to say violence “ought to solely be condemned, by no means inspired or joked about.”
Siva Vaidhyanathan, a professor of media research on the College of Virginia, mentioned most celebrities are cautious about their phrases, recognizing that not everybody will perceive their jokes or reply in a measured approach. Musk, he mentioned, has by no means had that type of filter.
Even so, Vaidhyanathan mentioned Musk’s affect may be overblown relating to political misinformation. His platform has misplaced cash and advertisers, and he is solely one in all many figures who’ve lengthy made false claims about elections.
“Musk is only one extra voice in that cacophony,” he mentioned.
___
Related Press writers Christina A. Cassidy in Atlanta, Chris Megerian in Washington and Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.
___
The Related Press receives help from a number of non-public foundations to reinforce its explanatory protection of elections and democracy. See extra about AP’s democracy initiative right here. The AP is solely chargeable for all content material.