Bonnie Blue is poking enjoyable at her “petting zoo” occasion whereas visiting an precise animal habitat.
In a photograph shared by way of her Instagram Story on Monday, June 23, Blue reached over a fence to the touch the highest of an animal’s head. “Petting zoo wasn’t so unhealthy,” she wrote over the picture.
In a observe up Story on one other Instagram account, Blue tossed feed at a pig by the pen. “Harmful actions on the petting zoo,” she added.
Blue’s add comes days after she was set to finish her “petting zoo” problem on June 15, the place she could be unclothed and tied to a glass field. Blue famous that she hoped to high her present document and sleep with 2,000 males on the occasion. Later this month, hypothesis swirled that Blue had been banned from the grownup content material platform.
Bonnie Blue Courtesy of Bonnie Blue/Instagram
“Excessive ‘problem’ content material will not be accessible on OnlyFans and isn’t permitted below our Acceptable Use Coverage and Phrases of Service,” a spokesperson instructed Us Weekly in an announcement. “Any breach of our Phrases of Service ends in content material or account deactivation.”
If the content material breaches the OnlyFans phrases of service, the subscription-based platform doesn’t allow creators to recommend that it may very well be positioned there. OnlyFans will act when customers breach their phrases of service.
Blue later broke her silence, telling the U.Ok.’s Daily Star that the platform “took unprecedented motion” by banning her for “making content material, whereas a number of different creators are mimicking my whole advertising and marketing strategies and occasions.”
“They deemed my content material ‘harmful’, though I’m the one individual creating this content material who has by no means publicly made statements about ending up in hospital, attributable to creating unsafe environments,” she mentioned in an announcement. “Nor have I publicly defined my unhappiness attributable to these occasions, not like others who’re allowed to remain.”
Days after Bonnie Blue was set to finish her “petting zoo” problem, studies swirled that the creator was banned from OnlyFans. “Excessive ‘problem’ content material will not be accessible on OnlyFans and isn’t permitted below our Acceptable Use Coverage and Phrases of Service,” a spokesperson instructed Us Weekly in an announcement. “Any breach of our Phrases […]
She continued, “The principle distinction between me and the others, I’m extra profitable and don’t cry or bleed after my occasions, as I perceive my physique and my limits.” (Blue seems to be throwing shade at fellow OnlyFans creators Lily Phillips and Annie Knight, who participated in their very own “aggressive intercourse” challenges and cried and ended up in a hospital after, respectively.)
Blue famous that she had precautions in place, together with checks with ID scanners and consent kinds. The creator claimed that she gives members with “free condoms, drinks and supplies to cover their identities to the general public in the event that they so select.”
“My content material was deemed ‘harmful’, but when I used to be banned for this, it calls into query the authenticity of the platform, as no different creator has had the identical therapy,” she mentioned. “From utilizing below age kids to advertise Solely Followers, to content material that needs to be prohibited from the platform.”
She continued, “It’s my perception that OnlyFans don’t care concerning the creators or the folks, however simply the press articles and public stress. If I didn’t have the platform I’ve for the onerous work I’ve executed I don’t suppose they’d have battered an eyelid, as confirmed with all of those different creators.”
Blue alleged that the platform has “extra of an issue” together with her sleeping with “barely legals” than if she “used kids to advertise my content material as an alternative.”
OnlyFans star Bonnie Blue is on the heart of a brand new debate inside the business: The place ought to creators draw the road with stunts? Blue, 26, lately made headlines when she shared a video the place she claimed she’d been arrested and seemingly staged a faux marriage ceremony with a fan — each of that are allegedly half […]
“They’ve extra of a problem with me utilizing consenting adults for content material than the opposite creators doing what I assume is identical factor,” she mentioned. “I didn’t do something out of the OnlyFans norm, but different creators can commit extra dangerous breaches of ToS and are high quality.”
Blue additionally claimed that she had as soon as been given a warning for content material that she didn’t add, alleging that she was confused for a distinct creator.
“How can an organization who doesn’t know the distinction between its personal influencers be a reliable supply to touch upon anybody’s content material?” she mentioned. “The platform has no subject with the content material I made, as is made clear by utilizing these different influencers as examples. They’ve a problem with me personally. I used to be singled out and used for instance.”
She concluded, “OnlyFans said any breach of their t & cs will result in account deactivation. If that’s the case, and I wasn’t discriminated in opposition to, how do they clarify the a number of different creators that additionally declare to do the identical.”
Us Weekly reached out to Blue and OnlyFans for remark.
To study extra concerning the critical potential dangers and harms of “aggressive intercourse” and different express OnlyFans content material — learn what medical doctors, psychological well being professionals and different consultants instructed Us Weekly right here.